kane249
Wibble
- Oct 27, 2006
- 52,155
- 68,890
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Sth Freo, Liverpool, Chicago Bulls
Wouldn't that go against the WA government's mandate though? That would still over arch it
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Wouldn't that go against the WA government's mandate though? That would still over arch it
Wouldn't that go against the WA government's mandate though? That would still over arch it
Of course.My thoughts too.
Agreed HB.Some companies would, almost correctly, think themselves too big to fail in that regard. Would be an interesting standoff.
Where's yesterday's positivity gone mate?It's most likely to do with the fact that if you don't get the jab you will lose your job, income, some freedoms.
As a result you will probably lose your house, car and then maybe family and somewhere in the mental health and possibly in some situations your life through suicide.
But yeah, hesitancy is at an all time low thanks to people CHOOSING the jab
Sorry, can't resist some off topic fun this morning. Crazy what *footballers* in other codes will do for a free kick these days, the opposite player is no-where near him lol. This would be what, a fine or suspension in AFL?
I think everyone who can should get vaxxed because there's mountains of evidence to show that it massively reduces your chance of getting badly sick.
The logic I can't follow is the same people saying "you should get vaxxed to be selfless, show compassion for your fellow humans"
but in the next breath
"if you have a different point of view to me I have no sympathy for you"
"You should follow the road rules about drink driving, show compassion for your fellow humans"
"If you think drink driving is acceptable I have no sympathy for you"
The two statements are perfectly consistent if you adopt 'social contract' type views on government regulation of human behaviour.
Depends on the context, if someone has a beer but thinks they are under the limit and then happens to crash their car, I'd probably think they're an idiot and made a bad choice, but I'd still feel bad for them.
It’d be tough to have any sympathy for anyone who marches around town protesting for their right to choose to drink drive.
They have the freedom to not get vaccinated, peacefully protest the vaccine mandate (amongst other things) in the middle of the city and pretty much say whatever they want as far as their crackpot theories go.I think everyone who can should get vaxxed because there's mountains of evidence to show that it massively reduces your chance of getting badly sick.
The logic I can't follow is the same people saying "you should get vaxxed to be selfless, show compassion for your fellow humans"
but in the next breath
"if you have a different point of view to me I have no sympathy for you"
They have the freedom to not get vaccinated, peacefully protest the vaccine mandate (amongst other things) in the middle of the city and pretty much say whatever they want as far as their crackpot theories go.
They don't have the freedom to not be judged by the rest of society for these actions.
I think everyone who can should get vaxxed because there's mountains of evidence to show that it massively reduces your chance of getting badly sick.
The logic I can't follow is the same people saying "you should get vaxxed to be selfless, show compassion for your fellow humans"
but in the next breath
"if you have a different point of view to me I have no sympathy for you"
Where's yesterday's positivity gone mate?
Sorry but I have no sympathy whatsover for anti-vaxxers.
I'm not sure much of this is relevant to the post you quoted. My post was about folks with the whole "get vaccinated for others" mantra, while showing almost no sympathy for anyone with a slightly different opinion.
Seems a bit hypocritical
Wouldn't that go against the WA government's mandate though? That would still over arch it
Personally, I struggled to understand people that say that they aren't anti-vax, they are just pro-choice.
Ok, so why not CHOOSE to get vaccinated? And why get angry at those that have made the choice to be vaccinated?
I don't get what there even is to be sympathetic about for people who don't get the vaccine?I'm not sure much of this is relevant to the post you quoted. My post was about folks with the whole "get vaccinated for others" mantra, while showing almost no sympathy for anyone with a slightly different opinion.
Seems a bit hypocritical
It's not a great analogy in my mind
There's plenty of people who are vaccinated who are anti the mandates.
I do understand being anti-mandate, being worried and opposed to government over reach is definitely a concern.Haha you wrongly assume I'm an anti-vaxxer.
My positivity is towards the footy club.
This mandate forced jab sh*t is wrong regardless of the safety and veracity of it.
Not sure anyone can agree with forced medical procedures.
Depends on the context, if someone has a beer but thinks they are under the limit and then happens to crash their car, I'd probably think they're an idiot and made a bad choice, but I'd still feel bad for them.