Remove this Banner Ad

AFL concussion class action expands – 8 more former players join case

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chief
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

The AFL is facing increasing pressure on concussion and player welfare, with eight more former players joining the growing class action led by former Geelong premiership player Max Rooke.

A new writ has been lodged in the Supreme Court of Victoria naming the AFL and multiple clubs as defendants, with claims that players have suffered permanent, life-altering injuries due to concussions sustained during their careers.

New players named​


The additional plaintiffs include:

Jack Fitzpatrick (Melbourne)
• Nick Stevens (Port Adelaide, Carlton)
• Gary Frangalas (Richmond)
• Michael Richardson (Collingwood, Essendon)
• Ian Fairley (North Melbourne)
• Rod MacPherson (Footscray)
Dylan Roberton (Fremantle)
• Brendan Littler (St Kilda)

They join Rooke as part of the broader class action covering players from 1985 to 2023.

What the case is about​


The claim alleges that repeated concussions have led to serious long-term physical and psychological damage, and that the AFL and clubs failed in their duty of care.

Some former players have pointed to:

• Ongoing cognitive and mental health issues
• Concerns around conditions like CTE
• A lack of adequate protections during earlier eras

A trial is currently targeted for May 2027 and could run for several months if it proceeds.

At the same time… AFL cracks down on contact​


In a related move, the AFL has introduced stricter rules for 2026, including:

Gut punches now a one-match suspension (not just a fine)
• Greater flexibility for the MRO on concussion-causing incidents
• Increased focus on avoidable physical contact

The league has made more than 30 changes in the past decade aimed at reducing concussion risk, including independent concussion spotters.

Two big questions​


This all raises some pretty serious questions:

• Did the AFL act too late on concussion?
• Is the modern game now overcorrecting?
• Will this case end in a massive payout or settlement?
• What does this mean for the future of the sport?
 
The AFL is facing increasing pressure on concussion and player welfare, with eight more former players joining the growing class action led by former Geelong premiership player Max Rooke.

A new writ has been lodged in the Supreme Court of Victoria naming the AFL and multiple clubs as defendants, with claims that players have suffered permanent, life-altering injuries due to concussions sustained during their careers.

New players named​


The additional plaintiffs include:

• Jack Fitzpatrick (Melbourne)
• Nick Stevens (Port Adelaide, Carlton)
• Gary Frangalas (Richmond)
• Michael Richardson (Collingwood, Essendon)
• Ian Fairley (North Melbourne)
• Rod MacPherson (Footscray)
• Dylan Roberton (Fremantle)
• Brendan Littler (St Kilda)

They join Rooke as part of the broader class action covering players from 1985 to 2023.

What the case is about​


The claim alleges that repeated concussions have led to serious long-term physical and psychological damage, and that the AFL and clubs failed in their duty of care.

Some former players have pointed to:

• Ongoing cognitive and mental health issues
• Concerns around conditions like CTE
• A lack of adequate protections during earlier eras

A trial is currently targeted for May 2027 and could run for several months if it proceeds.

At the same time… AFL cracks down on contact​


In a related move, the AFL has introduced stricter rules for 2026, including:

Gut punches now a one-match suspension (not just a fine)
• Greater flexibility for the MRO on concussion-causing incidents
• Increased focus on avoidable physical contact

The league has made more than 30 changes in the past decade aimed at reducing concussion risk, including independent concussion spotters.

Two big questions​


This all raises some pretty serious questions:

• Did the AFL act too late on concussion?
• Is the modern game now overcorrecting?
• Will this case end in a massive payout or settlement?
• What does this mean for the future of the sport?
That seems like four questions Chief
 
May as well add Libba to the list.

How he is still allowed to play is simply beyond belief.

More negligence from the AFL.

I think Joel Selwood was the worst. Everyone knew he drew high contact deliberately but the AFL continued to reward it. Should have been play on each time, and within a few matches if he didn't get free kicks for it Selwood would have stopped doing it. Doing so would have been protecting Selwood from himself.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom