AFL Evolution - Out May 5 - (Cont in LAUNCH THREAD - link in OP)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Mar 27, 2016
Posts
52
Likes
62
AFL Club
Fremantle
how do you know that some players couldn't get it done and that circumstances meant not everyone could do it...

surely that's an obvious assessment that one can make...

you're answer is not everyone could do it..

simple stuff, same thing happened in NBA2k...(with their massive budget)..

get a grip.
They have had roughly 4 years to at least model players correctly without face scans, even with their smaller budget, this allows them enough time to create a detailed version of that player using their tools
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

happy_eagle

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Mar 20, 2007
Posts
20,697
Likes
13,419
AFL Club
West Coast
The Player Ratings are only relevant if there is an actual gameplay difference between a player who is rated 90, and a player that is rated 70.
Thats what I am more interested in finding out, rather than carrying on like a child about a particular player at my club that wasn't rated high enough.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Joined
Dec 15, 2016
Posts
60
Likes
173
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
Other Teams
Detroit Pistons
Pretty big oversight IMO if you can't change the hair/facial hair of the scanned players. Would much rather play with up-to-date stuff like Ablett without the beard, Fyfe and Bont with pony tails ect
 
Joined
Jun 9, 2014
Posts
393
Likes
410
AFL Club
Collingwood
This was pretty expected, some look really good and some don't. I am a little curious as to why thats the case, it seems at least like most of the core team players were face scanned in one hit, but I suppose it wont be too big an issue once we're in-game playing on a zoomed out camera!
 

Soft Downhill Skier

2008-2010 wasn't me.
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Posts
34,091
Likes
26,838
AFL Club
GWS
For North fans, Marley Williams, Higgins, Swallow, Ziebell, Cunnington, Lindsay Thomas, Daw, Ben Brown, Macmillan and Hansen are very good.

Goldstein is excellent.

Thompson, Mullet, Wright, Tarrant, Gibson and Luke McDonald are just ok.

The rest are generic.
 

Soft Downhill Skier

2008-2010 wasn't me.
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Posts
34,091
Likes
26,838
AFL Club
GWS
The Player Ratings are only relevant if there is an actual gameplay difference between a player who is rated 90, and a player that is rated 70.
Thats what I am more interested in finding out, rather than carrying on like a child about a particular player at my club that wasn't rated high enough.
Yep. The 0-99 scale is the best thing Ive seen so far if these differences are reflected in gameplay. I really hope it is.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom