AFL Finals Dream Team 2007

[dont bowl there]

I'm 90th with a theory of going for who I think will be the highest scorers, but avoiding anyone with any talk of a niggling injury that may cause them to miss (eg. Waters on the weekend).

Anyone have any idea why there is no emergencies?

Meh both ways will work. This week im staying away from Bartel.

 

[Hu$tler]

any ideas for captain this week im going with bartel but gary ablett sounds good too :S

 

[PAFCsince1870]

Meh both ways will work. This week im staying away from Bartel.

any hidden reason, or just to be different?

taking Corey instead?

 

[Beau_Waters for PM]

any ideas for captain this week im going with bartel but gary ablett sounds good too :S

Choose the guy you think will be the highest scorer for the week

 

[dont bowl there]

any hidden reason, or just to be different?

taking Corey instead?

Just hoping every gets burnt by a poor score from him. Its a risk because he will probably score +100.

 

[We are the army]

its a massive risk seeing as the pies have no one to go with him

 

[dont bowl there]

its a massive risk seeing as the pies have no one to go with him

Probably but if he gets 40-60 its a massive bonus. IF my unique player gets more.

 

[Teh_Nub]

I dont think many people copy others teams i think they get knew ideas from it, anyway you cant win by copying peoples teams, which they will most likely change.

 

[kingyubbo]

Hoping Ling tags Lockyer or Swan so they get low scores.

 

[Mr Hard Ball Get]

Hoping Ling tags Lockyer or Swan so they get low scores.

why not have one and hope he scores heaps and the other one gets tagged

 

[dont bowl there]

why not have one and hope he scores heaps and the other one gets tagged

After Swans massive game against WCE and given the fact that Ling tagged him last time I am pretty confident it will happen again.

Tarkyn will probably be given the run with roll on either Bartel or Corey.

 

[Teh_Nub]

Pendles big day out? Howd Bucks go?

 

[kingyubbo]

I think Lockyer will get the tag as Swan is far slower in pace IMO, doesn't have as much of an impact on the game compared to Lockyer when both are on song.

 

[favourites]

I think ling will get pendles.

 

[Mr Hard Ball Get]

I think Lockyer will get the tag as Swan is far slower in pace IMO, doesn't have as much of an impact on the game compared to Lockyer when both are on song.

so last week when swan had 39 touches and kicked 2 goals he had minimal impact on the game compared to lockyer who had from memory 24 touches and no goals and neither were tagged

 

[dont bowl there]

so last week when swan had 39 touches and kicked 2 goals he had minimal impact on the game compared to lockyer who had from memory 24 touches and no goals and neither were tagged

Add to the fact that Swan had 11 clearences! Ling will go straight to Swan or Pendles. Lockyer will run with one of Geelongs midfielders.

 

[kingyubbo]

so last week when swan had 39 touches and kicked 2 goals he had minimal impact on the game compared to lockyer who had from memory 24 touches and no goals and neither were tagged

You've read my post wrong. I said when both are on song, Lockyer would have more on an impact.

 

[dont bowl there]

You've read my post wrong. I said when both are on song, Lockyer would have more on an impact.

Very very very debatable.

 

[kingyubbo]

Very very very debatable.

Indeed debatable, but by this years performances, Lockyer wins out IMO.

 

[dont bowl there]

Indeed debatable, but by this years performances, Lockyer wins out IMO.

I would say Swan by a mile, probably because of the game he played against Fremantle in round 10. That was an absolute dominant performance which included a heap of clearences.

 

[Teh_Nub]

Turn this back to Finals DT please lol. Go to the Collingwood Forums to discuss whose the better player?

 

[dont bowl there]

Turn this back to Finals DT please lol. Go to the Collingwood Forums to discuss whose the better player?

It has got to do with dream team, obviously the player Ling takes will have a far greater chance of doing crap. He thinks Lockyer will get Ling so will choose Swan, i think Swan will get Ling so will go Lockyer.

 

[Mr Hard Ball Get]

It has got to do with dream team, obviously the player Ling takes will have a far greater chance of doing crap. He thinks Lockyer will get Ling so will choose Swan, i think Swan will get Ling so will go Lockyer.

yeah i agree but i am thinking hard about whether to even pick up lockyer because he seems the most likely player to tag corey/bartell and i had lockyer all year and in the games he tagged he mostly scored 80 or less

 

[BuffDaddy]

One of the Port midfielders has got to turn it on, on Satdy nite. Was thinking about Shaun Burgoyne but he playd shit house against west coast

 

[Teh_Nub]

One of the Port midfielders has got to turn it on, on Satdy nite. Was thinking about Shaun Burgoyne but he playd shit house against west coast

Some1 mentioned Cassisi.