"Quarterly interstate migration cannot be directly measured and is estimated using administrative data."
I wouldn't get too excited about the figures. What was it that you were trying to prove anyway ?
-
Mobile App Discontinued
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
AFL overtaking NRL in QLD
- Thread starter pulpdriver
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
"Quarterly interstate migration cannot be directly measured and is estimated using administrative data."
I wouldn't get too excited about the figures. What was it that you were trying to prove anyway ?
- Moderator
- #2,802
overseas and interstate migration tables are two different things
National, state and territory population, March 2025
Statistics about the population and components of change (births, deaths, migration) for Australia and its states and territories
www.abs.gov.au
threenewpadlocks
Brownlow Medallist
AFAIU they estimate the figures by using things like Medicare data. It's accurate and close enough to be exact that splitting hairs if they're 100 off the real number isn't worth worrying about.
You're allowed to drive your car into another state and rent a house and get a job without interacting in the government in any way, so they're just making the point that they have no way of collecting that data in a literal sense.
The initial discussion was about Queenslanders leaving because of housing costs. I brought up the figures to say that was incorrect, and Queensland still has the strongest inflow of interstate migration (which has been the case for generations).
Yes, estimate.
Well it could be that be very true that quite a number Queenslanders are leaving because of housing costs.
just because they were replaced doesn't mean anything.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
threenewpadlocks
Brownlow Medallist
To such an accurate number that for the purposes of analysis it's pointless to care otherwise. We're talking +/- a couple of hundred difference between estimated and actual, at best.
Housing costs only matter in a relative sense. Ok, maybe some Queenslanders are leaving because of housing costs. More new Queenslanders are arriving because of housing costs in outside Queensland, though. The net effect of overall housing costs as it effects the whole of Australia makes Queensland get a greater net inflow of people, bloody hell, there's no point talking about anything if you're not going to look at the overall net effect, the point of this discussion.
What's the relativity to football?
threenewpadlocks
Brownlow Medallist
"AFL overtaking NRL in Queensland".
again, What's the relativity to football?
threenewpadlocks
Brownlow Medallist
It's incredible how your solution to being being shown up for being stupid is to .... play act continuing to be stupid.
Part of the reason why AFL is overtaking NRL in Queensland is because it has a net inflow of people from AFL states, therefore being part the discussion as to why this thread exists. Which shouldn't need explaining. Why am I here. Why have I posted several times on this thread.
Never know. Nrl afternoon prelim outrated both afl prelims in prime time .
That is widely assumed as fact, but then then the headlines switched to Queenslanders heading South due to housing costs.
Since the biggest "loser" by far according to these estimates is the NSW, how does that attest to helping QLD AFL ?
threenewpadlocks
Brownlow Medallist
Because the inflow of people (even if its only 40% or whatever) is still a greater proportionate AFL supporting than the existing Queensland base (say its 20%).
So you're trying to convert the remaining 80%, you need to get 30% of the remaining 80% (or 37.5% total) to AFL.
But if there's a net inflow of people that changes that 20% to 21%, you only need 29% of the remaining population of 79%, which is 36.9% of the remaining NRL fans. The maths becomes easier.
Furthermore you're more likely to get an NRL supporter to be an AFL supporter if they're the kind of person that has moved, because they're in a new environment away from the family/geographic ties that led them to support their NRL team in the first place. Sure, they might go to Titans, Cowboys or Broncos games. But given they're not going to Roosters/whatever games, they may as well go to Suns or Lions games would be the thinking.
I tend to agree with this argument w.r.t. the new environment.
Moving has powerful repercussions.
I even know a workmate who came to Sydney and found the Sydney Swans.
You don't know me, because if you knew me you'd know that I'm extremely happy the way AFL is growing in Queensland, the men, the juniors and especially the women.
The Lions are popular in Queensland because they became AFL premiers - a great boost to the game in Queensland..
The Lions are popular in Australia because they brought down an arrogant outfit that being the Geelong Cats.
With Matt Rowell winning the Brownlow Medal it was the icing on the cake.
Now there is a dual focus in Queensland - will the Lions continue to dominate or will the Suns challenge.
Posters can bring up all the irrelevant garbage that they might because it is indeed irrelevant.
The big numbers point to a great future for QldAFL.
I can confirm that this is happening. I've met several people from Sydney who have moved here over the last five years and although they come with their existing affiliation to a Sydney-based NRL team, they're willing to give the Suns or Lions a chance because they want to 'experience new things' now that they live in Queensland. Going to a Titans or Broncos game doesn't appeal in the same way because they've been a part of the NRL sphere for so long down in Sydney and they are looking for new experiences after making the move north.
- Nov 21, 2013
- 8,476
- 6,957
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
Is there an independent link that can be posted here to show that the AFL is overtaking the NRL in Queensland?
threenewpadlocks
Brownlow Medallist
Back to trolling, I see.
It's a forum. It's a discussion about the theoretical possibility.
For example, here is a list showing how close the two sports are in terms of non-playing participation in the sport.
Of course, it isn't that close by other metrics such as TV viewership of the elite code in TV numbers.
- Nov 21, 2013
- 8,476
- 6,957
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
How is that trolling when i ask for a link?
There's either an independent link or there isn't
Stop being so sensitive when asked to post a link. If there isn't one just say. It's really that simple.
Is there an independent link that can be posted here that disproves that the AFL is overtaking the NRL in Queensland?
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
threenewpadlocks
Brownlow Medallist
Because the concept of "overtaking" is not something that can be proven or disproven with a single link that has overarching wisdom, and any sincere discussion would not be asking it, at all. That's just common sense. You asking of one is a "just asking questions" troll.
- Nov 21, 2013
- 8,476
- 6,957
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
Fair enough so there is no independent link, and you can't answer ask my question as there is no link.
For future reference when you make a claim can you make sure you have a link to back up a claim, otherwise it carries no weight.
threenewpadlocks
Brownlow Medallist
Nobody is making the claim. It's a topic that's worthwhile a discussion and merits a discussion, as per the post I quoted above. This is an online forum. Discussing topics is literally why this website exists. There have literally been dozens of links to statistics, news articles, discussions that have led to further discussion over the 113 pages. You are very capable of using the search function, like I did to search the word "Ausplay" to provide you with some past statistics posted here.
Being puzzled at... discussing a topic that is interesting to some people (when you've been a member of said forum for years, you clearly understand what it is), and playing dumb about it is just trolling behaviour to me.
Would you feel better if the thread was retitled to, "Is AFL overtaking NRL in Qld"? The discussion would be identical in any case
I know that I'm extremely happy the way AFL is growing in Queensland, the men, the juniors and especially the women.
The Lions are popular in Queensland because they became AFL premiers - a great boost to the game in Queensland..
The Lions are popular in Australia because they brought down an arrogant outfit that being the Geelong Cats.
With Matt Rowell winning the Brownlow Medal it was the icing on the cake.
Now there is a dual focus in Queensland - will the Lions continue to dominate or will the Suns challenge.
Did you know that ?
- Nov 21, 2013
- 8,476
- 6,957
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
I suggest many have made the claim is you go back through the posts.
Anyway lets be happy that anybody in the future here will post a link to back up any claim, and just not hopefull thinking.
Enjoy the rest of the day
threenewpadlocks
Brownlow Medallist
Prove it. Quote where people have sincerely suggested the case. I don't think that has happened at all.
I don't mean people talking about regions of Qld such as Cairns, Gold Coast etc. Like, the entire state.
Similar threads
