AFL Round 6

[Moses01]

anyone been paid their 25% SB bonus for their multi's yet?

 

[Syphoncom]

anyone been paid their 25% SB bonus for their multi's yet?

FWIW:

o Have a minimum stake of $10
o Contain a minimum of 4-legs and maximum of 12-legs
o Have a minimum Final Multi Price of 6.00
o And be a winning multi-bet
o Contain minimum odds per leg of $1.20
o Maximum bonus amount payable for 25% Winners Bonus will be $150.

Meet the requirements?

 

[Moses01]

yea i do, been picking my multis with the rules in mind

 

[whats_at_stake]

Can someone please explain this to me:

Sportsbet paid out on this for me: Ess -66.5-Watson Over 30.5-Ess 1st Team to Score-Ablett Over 28.5 when I thought I lost $1 bet. Paid out almost $9.

Does someone know what -66.5 means (I thought it meant Essendon to win by less then 66.5 but maybe it means Essendon to not lose by more then 66.5?

 

[The GOAT]

Can someone please explain this to me:

Sportsbet paid out on this for me: Ess -66.5-Watson Over 30.5-Ess 1st Team to Score-Ablett Over 28.5 when I thought I lost $1 bet. Paid out almost $9.

Does someone know what -66.5 means (I thought it meant Essendon to win by less then 66.5 but maybe it means Essendon to not lose by more then 66.5?

It means Essendon to win with a -66.5 head start (ie Essendon to win by more than 66.5).

 

[whats_at_stake]

It means Essendon to win with a -66.5 head start (ie Essendon to win by more than 66.5).

Cheers thank you for that. Surely they could use >66.5 or the word "over" since they use it for the rest. Will keep this in mind for the future.

 

[Purrfect Pussies]

anyone been paid their 25% SB bonus for their multi's yet?

Still waiting for mine for one that finished with our +15 runs.....

 

[Borgsta]

Generally it takes 48 hours to come through.

 

[Lakey91]

Matt White's tweets.

Surely you would hedge come the last bet for that sort of return?

 

[yamahamoto]

anyone else have Collingwood over 39.5 in the final leg of there multi?
Was getting ready to through my phone through the tv before the last quarter but i now have the biggest man crush on Leeroy Brown

4 mins into the 4th quarter i was gonna throw out my ticket with collingwood over 39...lucky...collingwood is the team to back to get over the lines...

 

[baywatch5]

ROUND 6

MARGIN - EAGLES 1-39 (x1.5) LOSS
MARGIN - SWANS 1-39 (x2) LOSS
ML - SWANS (x2) LOSS
1ST Q - LIONS (x1.5) WIN
ATS - BOMBERS -65.5 (X1) WIN
ATS - MAGPIES -34.5 (x1.5) WIN
2ND H - MAGPIES -22.5 (x1.5) (-37.5 game line) WIN
4TH Q - MAGPIES -5.5 (x2) WIN

AFL YTD: 17-13-2 (+9.67 @ 57%)

PIES finish off strong ending a positive round 6 going 5-3 +2.31

AFL YTD: 22-16-2 (+11.98 @ 57.9%)

 

[KardiniaPark]

Scratch that - thought it was at Subi - maybe more like Ess 1.60 WC 2.65

You on crack? You will be lucky to get $1.30.

 

[The Big Woofer]

You on crack? You will be lucky to get $1.30.

KP, do me a favour & remind me how insipid Port are if i ever try & make a case for them winning a game outside of SA again.

 

[sane]

Long time reader, but rarely post here..

This weekend I had a 3 leg multi on SB's Dreamteam market:

Hartlett (106) to beat Rawlings (105) and Wells (80)
Rockliff (132) to beat Redden (131) and Martin (119)
Foley (123) to beat Houli (116) and Rich (60)

In my betting transaction history it is showing that this multi did not win.
It says the first leg won, but the second lost, which is incorrect.

Has anyone encountered this before? An email to SB enough to sort it out?

 

[Lensen]

Just go on their live chat

 

[KardiniaPark]

KP, do me a favour & remind me how insipid Port are if i ever try & make a case for them winning a game outside of SA again.

To be fair I did try!

 

[Borgsta]

Rockliffe probably got a touch near the end of the game which put him on top. Sometimes the sites are slow to update to the proper scores so they may have resulted it before it was corrected. *100% guess

 

[asanque]

Anyone burnt by the AFL's error?
http://www.news.com.au/afl-admits-interchange-bungle/story-e6frf9jf-1226048348722

I.e. anyone on either side under 15.5

 

[bombers boy]

can anyone help me with this i use tab sportsbet i put a bet on in the collingwood vs western bulldogs game for dane swan to be leading possesion getter for group A,heath shaw got most possies with dane swan 2nd but heath shaw wasnt in group A just wondering why i wouldnt recieve my money for this

 

[shavedham2kg]

Anyone burnt by the AFL's error?
http://www.news.com.au/afl-admits-interchange-bungle/story-e6frf9jf-1226048348722

I.e. anyone on either side under 15.5

West Coast +9.5/Sydney +14.5 @ 1.98
Sydney +13.5/Brisbane +36.5 @ 1.96
Sydney +13.5/St Kilda +23.5 @ 1.98
Sydney +13.5/Collingwood -13.5 @ 1.97
Highlanders +10.5/Waratahs -3.5/Crusaders/Sydney +13.5 @ 4.15

 

[Athomas]

Long time reader, but rarely post here..

This weekend I had a 3 leg multi on SB's Dreamteam market:

Hartlett (106) to beat Rawlings (105) and Wells (80)
Rockliff (132) to beat Redden (131) and Martin (119)
Foley (123) to beat Houli (116) and Rich (60)

In my betting transaction history it is showing that this multi did not win.
It says the first leg won, but the second lost, which is incorrect.

Has anyone encountered this before? An email to SB enough to sort it out?

Redden was on 133 for at least half an hour after the game, got a handpass taken off him after that. They probably paid out on Redden beating Rocky, but yeah just go on the chat if you haven't already.

 

[yamahamoto]

can anyone help me with this i use tab sportsbet i put a bet on in the collingwood vs western bulldogs game for dane swan to be leading possesion getter for group A,heath shaw got most possies with dane swan 2nd but heath shaw wasnt in group A just wondering why i wouldnt recieve my money for this

according to TAB Heath Shaw was in group A. Paid $21. Sidebottom won group B, pays $7.50

 

[KardiniaPark]

can anyone help me with this i use tab sportsbet i put a bet on in the collingwood vs western bulldogs game for dane swan to be leading possesion getter for group A,heath shaw got most possies with dane swan 2nd but heath shaw wasnt in group A just wondering why i wouldnt recieve my money for this

Shaw was definately in Group A.

 

[The Big Woofer]

To be fair I did try!

they are really big odds vs Haw this fri night thought, i mean $4.50 is really big @ home & it will be very slippery due to dew factor with cold night forecast.....may negate Haw talls plus Haw off the bye......I hear a little voice saying don't do it!!!

 

[bombers boy]

according to TAB Heath Shaw was in group A. Paid $21. Sidebottom won group B, pays $7.50

oh cheers mate,yeah my mistake read it wrong.didnt think shaw would be group A for some reason.