ManWithNoName
TheBrownDog
Nice start, now if Sydney can co-operate I'll be off to a very good start to the weekend.
-
Mobile App Discontinued
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
AFL Round 6
- Thread starter Byejune
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
Nice start, now if Sydney can co-operate I'll be off to a very good start to the weekend.
ROUND 6
MARGIN - EAGLES 1-39 (x1.5) LOSS
MARGIN - SWANS 1-39 (x2)
ATS - BOMBERS -65.5 (X1)
ATS - MAGPIES -34.5 (x1.5)
GL all
AFL YTD: 17-13-2 (+9.67 @ 57%)
ADDING
ML - SWANS (x2)
Really hate margin bets..... Found myself hoping Melbourne would start scoring last night when I liked the Eagles from the start. Swans win tonight and hopefully stay under but not taking any chances.
Taken under 174.5 match total tonight 365 obviously stuffed up (again) now into 158.5...
is there a good way to take advantage of this, could obviously take the over and hope it falls in the middle but with rain around that could be shooting myself in the foot???
is there a good way to take advantage of this, could obviously take the over and hope it falls in the middle but with rain around that could be shooting myself in the foot???
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Nothing
Brownlow Medallist
- Jul 30, 2009
- 14,707
- 24,085
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
I like it, good find. Might back it up with GCS low score on Sunday.
into 3s but cheers
hey gents. i don't know if this is widespread practice for all bookmakers..
if i punt on a 2 legged multi:
(i)
A @ 1.83
B @ 1.93
= 3.5898 [lets just say its this, i dont have calculator here]
OR
(ii)
A @ 1.84
B @ 1.94
= 3.5849 [lets just say its this, i dont have calculator here]
I placed a bet similar to (ii) this morning but then realised the payout on their sheet is = 3.58
That means if I play a $10000 wager, I would lose $35849 - $35800 = $49
Do ALL bookmakers round it off to 2 dp? That so unfair!
I was so angry when I saw 3.58 and the payout was exactly that, they did not take 3.5849!
For (i), does that mean bookmakers take 3.59 (assuming they continue their form and take odds to 2dp?)?
if i punt on a 2 legged multi:
(i)
A @ 1.83
B @ 1.93
= 3.5898 [lets just say its this, i dont have calculator here]
OR
(ii)
A @ 1.84
B @ 1.94
= 3.5849 [lets just say its this, i dont have calculator here]
I placed a bet similar to (ii) this morning but then realised the payout on their sheet is = 3.58
That means if I play a $10000 wager, I would lose $35849 - $35800 = $49
Do ALL bookmakers round it off to 2 dp? That so unfair!
I was so angry when I saw 3.58 and the payout was exactly that, they did not take 3.5849!
For (i), does that mean bookmakers take 3.59 (assuming they continue their form and take odds to 2dp?)?
- Oct 16, 2008
- 10,657
- 6,394
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Cheers.
Melbourne out to 2.10 on sportsbet now, suspect that would just be people laying off on everyone else.
footysage
Debutant
He is basically asking to what decimal place to bookies round off to for multis. I know b365 does round off to more than 2 decimal places, not sure about others.
hey gents. i don't know if this is widespread practice for all bookmakers..
if i punt on a 2 legged multi:
(i)
A @ 1.83
B @ 1.93
= 3.5898 [lets just say its this, i dont have calculator here]
OR
(ii)
A @ 1.84
B @ 1.94
= 3.5849 [lets just say its this, i dont have calculator here]
I placed a bet similar to (ii) this morning but then realised the payout on their sheet is = 3.58
That means if I play a $10000 wager, I would lose $35849 - $35800 = $49
Do ALL bookmakers round it off to 2 dp? That so unfair!
I was so angry when I saw 3.58 and the payout was exactly that, they did not take 3.5849!
For (i), does that mean bookmakers take 3.59 (assuming they continue their form and take odds to 2dp?)?
Even though it appears to be rounded off to 2 decimal places, the actual payout will include the full number (as many dp as required).
Rooster Cogburn
Premiership Player
- Dec 16, 2010
- 3,193
- 837
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Other Teams
- Arsenal
I think Centrebet pay to 4dp. I'm very surprised that any would round to 2dp?
Taken Carlton / North / Rich / Saints @ $8.80
Not a good start last night, Multi is still on but i expected westcoast to win by less. Have put a small bet on Sydney tonight. I think it will be close, i recon 10-20 points but given i missed out purely to margin last night have got head to head.
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
ManWithNoName
TheBrownDog
I managed to get $5 on North for lowest scoring team @ $81 at Sportsbet. Probably won't happen but I can see it being a terrible, scrappy game where football is the loser.
yamahamoto
Team Captain
Boak is out for Port...Brogan is doubtful....if he is out as well i can see an easy win for North...
Rooster Cogburn
Premiership Player
- Dec 16, 2010
- 3,193
- 837
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Other Teams
- Arsenal
I took Port with a 40.5 start in a crazy multi, starting to think that won't be near enough
ManWithNoName
TheBrownDog
With that news...
Either team under 15.5 (Sydney v Carlton)
Kangaroos
Adelaide
Brisbane
1.5U @ $17.29
Either team under 15.5 (Sydney v Carlton)
Kangaroos
Adelaide
Brisbane
1.5U @ $17.29
- Jul 22, 2008
- 1,275
- 34
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Other Teams
- Nth Adl Roosters, NY Knicks,WestHam
Don't be so sure.....Port have far more quality targets up forward than NM who will rely heavily on Petrie & this week he'll have a far more experienced stronger opponent.....I still say Port win this game.
I would be very keen to lay NM if i were a bookmaker at the going odds.
