Remove this Banner Ad

News AFL to Dees: Please Explain

  • Thread starter Thread starter Wickzki
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

There doesn't need to be any explanation.. The decision was pathetic and the monkey's behind the MRP and Tribunal is jeopardizing the game we love!
 
I know that. I meant what were the exact words they said? Was it anything bad?

Mostly just stuff like "shattered".

Probably the "worst" from the AFL's point of view were Sylvia's which included "I'm scared to tackle now" and Frawley's which included a netball reference.

Oh and Green questioned the whole "duty of care" thing.
 
AFL via Twitter said:
Ricky Petterd and James Frawley have been given suspended $2500 fines for their tweets on Tuesday night. Demons fined $5000, also suspended.

There ya go
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Ahh that's right. I'm surprised that Frawley got a fine. We all know what he was suggesting but is the AFL admitting that it thinks netball is soft by fining him? :p
 
He just said the one word...bulls**t

I'm not sure how that fine would stand up in court. So if I tweeted that word would my employer automatically assume I was talking about them?? How self absorbed.

"We encourage free speech. There's no issue with that. But if it's unreasonable, we'll have an issue with it." - That's big Andrew's Chairman Mao impersonation.

You can say what you want, but not. :confused:
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom