I hope notis the plan to only release 1 round at a time each monday or more going forward?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
I hope notis the plan to only release 1 round at a time each monday or more going forward?
yeah surely they can at least release 2 rounds at a timeI hope not
Meh.Adelaide Crows AFLW side having to train at home by themselves this week with Adelaide's lockdown, while all other clubs can train as normal
However at the start of the year West Coast & Fremantle men's side were not allowed to train despite the state allowing it because the Vic clubs couldn't train
Gotta love consistency, eh?
What a fking joke
This from a supporter of a racist football club with a pr0n stars name. Mega cred there!I flicked the channel to the game last night, last quarter, perfect conditions, 1 goal each.
How anyone can watch this garbage has me beat.
OuchThis from a supporter of a racist football club with a pr0n stars name. Mega cred there!
sounds like a good close gameI flicked the channel to the game last night, last quarter, perfect conditions, 1 goal each.
How anyone can watch this garbage has me beat.
Champ, there were two points total kicked in the first quarter of the Freo v Adelaide game on the weekend and I defy you you to have found a more enthralling contest in any other game in any other sport played over the weekend.I flicked the channel to the game last night, last quarter, perfect conditions, 1 goal each.
How anyone can watch this garbage has me beat.
The most exposure AFLW got on the weekend was when Ash Barty mentioned it in an interview after her match, which rated 1.076 million on Nine. Regardless, is the point of the league to maximise the potential of women's footy... or just to clear the low bar set by soccer, netball, cricket, etc.?It will always lose out to the start of the men's season. But even then is still getting more exposure than any other women's sport.
So just suck it up and go for it.
I’d say that women’s cricket has set a pretty decent barThe most exposure AFLW got on the weekend was when Ash Barty mentioned it in an interview after her match, which rated 1.076 million on Nine. Regardless, is the point of the league to maximise the potential of women's footy... or just to clear the low bar set by soccer, netball, cricket, etc.?
28,000 viewers on Fox on Saturday night for Melbourne-North. Haven't seen the FTA numbers but, with it only airing in two cities, it rated less than 86,000 on 7mate. That's what stiff competition will do, and a season stretching into winter is just going to result in more of these high quality matches confined to darker shadows. This is only irrelevant if the vast majority of players aren't interested in turning the league into a relatively self-sustaining professional set-up (they are, though).
The AFL can't control the number of games TV broadcasters want to air. Not to any greater degree than being able to control what games 7 does and doesn't put on its main channel. It's juvenile to depict such negotiations as an issue which can simply be solved throughwillpowerGillpower. "Just suck it up" sounds like the bluster I hear from that horse slaughterer bloke who's now doing many great things for the other football code.
The AFLW has to do what's best for the AFLW competition, and let crowds build of that.The most exposure AFLW got on the weekend was when Ash Barty mentioned it in an interview after her match, which rated 1.076 million on Nine. Regardless, is the point of the league to maximise the potential of women's footy... or just to clear the low bar set by soccer, netball, cricket, etc.?
28,000 viewers on Fox on Saturday night for Melbourne-North. Haven't seen the FTA numbers but, with it only airing in two cities, it rated less than 86,000 on 7mate. That's what stiff competition will do, and a season stretching into winter is just going to result in more of these high quality matches confined to darker shadows. This is only irrelevant if the vast majority of players aren't interested in turning the league into a relatively self-sustaining professional set-up (they are, though).
The AFL can't control the number of games TV broadcasters want to air. Not to any greater degree than being able to control what games 7 does and doesn't put on its main channel. It's juvenile to depict such negotiations as an issue which can simply be solved throughwillpowerGillpower. "Just suck it up" sounds like the bluster I hear from that horse slaughterer bloke who's now doing many great things for the other football code.
Maximising viewership is central to the AFL's vision for the league, they believe it is what's best for the competition. If you don't know that then you haven't listened to any of Gillon McLachlan's Season Launch speeches. Last year, for example, he must have said "I'm proud that every match will be televised" at least three times (clearly a shot at the pitiful mostly livestreamed WBBL coverage, among other easy targets).The AFLW has to do what's best for the AFLW competition, and let crowds build of that.
Those decisions have been made since the league's inception (Carlton and Collingwood getting inaugural licences, for example). It's worked out fairly well so far.If it starts making decisions based on how many will watch, then that's a slippery slope to irrelevance imop.
Facebook decide to cut off AFLW from FB
we need to rise up as one and cancel that algorithm (as soon as we have finished cancelling Justin Timberlake)Disgusting today for social media
insta's where it is at for AFLW from competition wide info to player's and club's individual postsA few people do. If it doesn't inconvenient you, power to you.