Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Here is the incident. It definitely warrants being looked at and would be in the men's game. Arms pinned so Darcy has no means of protecting herself. She drives her into the ground and doesn't do anything to soften the impact. Its just lucky (if you can say lucky in this situation) that it wasn't her head/neck that got driven into the ground.Incidentally, what is your view on the legality of the brutal tackle/dump on Collingwood's D. Guttridge that left her with a broken collar bone (& will likely miss most of the AFLW season)? Is it being reviewed by the AFL? Unduly Rough Play Rule?
A legal tackle should never result in the tackled player getting their collar bone broken -considerable force would have to be applied. The Umpire played a free kick against the Melb. player for "High Contact".
Don't think she has a case to answer personally. Not even sure it was high. It is possible to break your collarbone with the way your shoulder hits the ground. She tackled from behind, with both players having a lot of forward momentum, so no practical way to soften the impact really. Gutteridge hits the ground shoulder first with all her weight and momentum on to it, and all the tacklers. Pop goes the collarbone.Here is the incident. It definitely warrants being looked at and would be in the men's game. Arms pinned so Darcy has no means of protecting herself. She drives her into the ground and doesn't do anything to soften the impact. Its just lucky (if you can say lucky in this situation) that it wasn't her head/neck that got driven into the ground.
Not sure if practice games can get reviewed by the MRP? But it definitely would get examined if it happened in the AFL season.
Not dropping all her weight into the tackle. I don't think she had to dive to make the tackle. As it turns out it was an illegal tackle as judged by the umpire.Did you have anything in mind when you said, soften the impact?
This is sad.Did you have anything in mind when you said, soften the impact? Dragging her down instead of driving her would be difficult as she was running her down from behind and made a diving tackle. Turning in the tackle is to avoid frees, not protect the player, and ironically involves turning them more onto the shoulder.
Protecting the player with pinned arms applies to slinging tackles, pinning the arms in a driving tackle is actually a good tackle
Nothing in that even worth looking at. Player fumbled then found herself flat footed at time of tackle. Only thing the tackler did wrong was get in her back or would have been holding the ball.Here is the incident. It definitely warrants being looked at and would be in the men's game. Arms pinned so Darcy has no means of protecting herself. She drives her into the ground and doesn't do anything to soften the impact. Its just lucky (if you can say lucky in this situation) that it wasn't her head/neck that got driven into the ground.
Not sure if practice games can get reviewed by the MRP? But it definitely would get examined if it happened in the AFL season.
That a perfectly normal tackle injured someone?This is sad.
Glad you dont think Carey Park players should be driven into the ground, considering my son plays for them.Jumping on someone's back and driving them into the ground is not and never was a perfectly normal tackle; not even against Carey Park in the Bunbury league in the sixties. And yes, I am a Pies supporter and yes, I was at the game.