- Nov 27, 2016
- 17,539
- 33,919
- AFL Club
- Carlton
probably right about that but at times she seemed as mobile as a witches hat.I woodnt drop Arnell she was directing traffic on many occasion, he leadership is important...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
probably right about that but at times she seemed as mobile as a witches hat.I woodnt drop Arnell she was directing traffic on many occasion, he leadership is important...
Whilst the individual skills might have improved a bit, as a spectacle it was bog ordinary. No goals after half time, 1 point scored in the last qtr in conditions perfect for football. And this is not an AFLW footy issue because I've seen some terrible AFL footy as well.
Turns out it was on!
4.6kg.... Carlton CHF in 2036!
The big difference is skill execution under pressure and because both sides last night were applying a lot of defensive pressure we saw a lot of poor execution. This was particularly evident when the ball went inside 50 - the forwards were unable to convert many inside 50s to scores.
Gotta be reasonable here, the men are fully professional, train all the time and put a lot of training time into executing in pressure situations. Until the women are fully paid professionals, comparing skills and fitness will never be fair. It will take time, but one day we will get there.
I wasn't comparing them to men at all, I went and watched a couple of great games of AFLW last season, my neice plays for Melbourne. Last night's game just wasn't one for the ages.
Turns out it was on!
4.6kg.... Carlton CHF in 2036!
Holy * that's a big bubba. Well done Mrs Shandog the poor darl.Turns out it was on!
4.6kg.... Carlton CHF in 2036!
Agree on Davey with the recruitment of Harris + Stevens id have both Davey + Vescio spending a fair chunk of the game in the middle . I agree with ODN lets get our best ball handlers and class into the middle . We were pretty much defending for our lives for 3 quarters last night unable to control possession of the ball and the tempo and lucky to get away with the win .I'd leave Vescio where she is and move Davey into the midfield. Now that we have Stevens we could probably afford to move her.
Taylah was the difference tbh. I thought Collingwood played better team footy but they fell away going into f50 because our defensive unit is bloody great.In a word, disappointing.
I was expecting better skills and better execution / game plan from us.
We didn’t look like we knew or even practised the short running game at all and when we did have an option short or wide of play we would miss the target!
We where lucky in the end as I felt they where the better team and certaintly played the better footy.
I agree with all of this.7 newbies
Pies have had 12 months to get their s**t together
The pressure was 30% harder than last year
We spent tickets early, think we were a little over excited bu the occasion.
Lost our structure a bit.
Dominated early parts of each of the last 3/4's but ran out of juice. Which reinforces we went too hard.
BUT.
Harris was a standout
The Maddie Gay looks likely
If G.Gee stops running over the footy she will be something else.
My BOG was Loynes
Pretty good debut if you ask me. Very impressive.harris taken the spotlight vescio had last year - we need to be a little less tayla-centric eventually but
Neither am I.I’m not sure about Keeping...
I hope I'm wrong but looking at GWS I think we may get rekt.
Last year players were contracted to the club for a set number of contact hours per week, from memory 9 hours. I'd assume there's something similar for 2018, so if we're doing an extra session it's likely the training volume is more spread. It's an interesting thought - is 4 shorter sessions better than 3 longer ones?I think it was Nathan Burke on ABC mentioned that even two weeks ago Collingwood were doing a hard running unit at training, which would normally be done at the start of preseason. They were also training 4 times a week compared to 3 for most teams (including us). How much difference does this make?
Slight change to hours this year...Last year players were contracted to the club for a set number of contact hours per week, from memory 9 hours. I'd assume there's something similar for 2018, so if we're doing an extra session it's likely the training volume is more spread. It's an interesting thought - is 4 shorter sessions better than 3 longer ones?