- Moderator
- #201
You haven't answered how this could possibly be seen as short-sighted.
Trading out three good players to get one that underperformed in the only season that has mattered so far, is short sighted.
I'd agree with you if Tayla was older but the fact is she's one of the best players in the competition and she's only recently turned 20 years old.
That "FACT" isnt borne out by the only season of AFLW she's played in.
Bringing someone in who we hope will be a superstar for our club for the next 10 years - as well as getting back into the early stages of the draft - is basically the exact opposite of short-sighted moves.
Sorry, but this just isn't true.
Right. She was a ******* superstar last year. I forgot.
She was 19 in AFLW season one and widely considered one of the best players in the competition.
BY WHO? The only place ive seen that expressed is on this board in the last couple of days.
She didn't have as big an impact as expected, but you need only look at the number of times she was double and triple teamed to understand why.
Christ i guess they'll stop doing that this season then to give her a fair go right?
Much like we did with Mo Hope in the opening game of the year, clubs clearly identified Tayla as a weapon and did everything possible to limit her influence.
And mo hope is no longer going to be a tier 1 player as a result. Witness the tears being shed by Lions supporters over harris departure.
Even with all that to contend with, she wasn't as useless as you seem to think she was. Inaccuracy didn't help her cause (4 goals 9 behinds), yet she took 17 contested marks - almost on par with a few clubs for the season, and 6 more than any other player in the competition.
I didnt say she was useless. I said that shes not worth trading three players for. And i stand by that.