Alavi speaks

Remove this Banner Ad

The GG said:
which independent tribunal are you talking about mate?
what about a fair dinkum court
let's see how flash ASADA is when their abuse of process is opened up for all to see
Click to expand...
WTF??:confused:

You have no idea mate. The anti-doping code, decisions of the tribunal, etc., are part of the "rules of the game". (Read the WADA and AFL codes; they say precisely that.)

Talking about taking a tribunal decision to court is like asking the court to overrule a 'holding the ball' decision.

Players and officials can complain all they like, but in the end the tribunal (like the MRP and other decision making panels) is the final arbiter of whether rules have been broken and penalties must be served.
 
The GG said:
which independent tribunal are you talking about mate?
what about a fair dinkum court
let's see how flash ASADA is when their abuse of process is opened up for all to see
Click to expand...

Essendon want an injunction and evidence thrown out, they don't want it in any court. Fair Dinkum or not
 
Argy said:
WTF??:confused:

You have no idea mate. The anti-doping code, decisions of the tribunal, etc., are part of the "rules of the game". (Read the WADA and AFL codes; they say precisely that.)

Talking about taking a tribunal decision to court is like asking the court to overrule a 'holding the ball' decision.

Players and officials can complain all they like, but in the end the tribunal (like the MRP and other decision making panels) is the final arbiter of whether rules have been broken and penalties must be served.
Click to expand...

shouldn't you wait to see what comes of the Federal Court action
afterall
the record of the HTB legal experts to date is, well, it's pretty poor isn't it?
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Armchair Critic said:
Essendon want an injunction and evidence thrown out, they don't want it in any court. Fair Dinkum or not
Click to expand...

if there has been no abuse of process by ASADA
then I'm sure they will be able to defend it in the Federal Court
but we must always, always, without exception, expect that government bodies with legislated powers use them in accordance with all relevant legislation
I say this for you protection, for the protection of all Australians
why should an exception be made for an authority investigating footballers? it's hardly terrorism or national security is it?
but given the hysteria on this board for 17 months now, you'd think we are talking about the most heinous crimes (when, in fact, we are not talking about crimes at all)
 
The GG said:
if there has been no abuse of process by ASADA
then I'm sure they will be able to defend it in the Federal Court
but we must always, always, without exception, expect that government bodies with legislated powers use them in accordance with all relevant legislation
I say this for you protection, for the protection of all Australians
why should an exception be made for an authority investigating footballers? it's hardly terrorism or national security is it?
but given the hysteria on this board for 17 months now, you'd think we are talking about the most heinous crimes (when, in fact, we are not talking about crimes at all)
Click to expand...

But the players were deceived weren't they. That is Criminal
 
Armchair Critic said:
But the players were deceived weren't they. That is Criminal
Click to expand...

deceived by ASADA?
I'll leave that one for the HTB legal experts
my reference to "crimes" was in relation to the Essendon footballers
the hysteria I've had to read on this very board
with people wanting to drop every legal protection normally afforded those alleged of real crimes
you'd think the footballers must have been involved in the most heinous crimes imaginable
but all they did was take some micky mouse gear
big deal!
 
The GG said:
deceived by ASADA?
I'll leave that one for the HTB legal experts
my reference to "crimes" was in relation to the Essendon footballers
the hysteria I've had to read on this very board
with people wanting to drop every legal protection normally afforded those alleged of real crimes
you'd think the footballers must have been involved in the most heinous crimes imaginable
but all they did was take some micky mouse gear
big deal!
Click to expand...

They are just dead shits according to chip
 
The GG said:
deceived by ASADA?
I'll leave that one for the HTB legal experts
my reference to "crimes" was in relation to the Essendon footballers
the hysteria I've had to read on this very board
with people wanting to drop every legal protection normally afforded those alleged of real crimes
you'd think the footballers must have been involved in the most heinous crimes imaginable
but all they did was take some micky mouse gear
big deal!
Click to expand...
Using a food supplement is tantamount to genocide though, I'm surprised it is not illegal, by law, via legislation. You know like illegal drugs.
Coffee too.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Everyone's favourite compounding pharmacist is currently on ABC 2 show head space spruiking his anti ageing treatments
 
Satan said:
Can i get my 6 cents back ?
Click to expand...
Its amazing how much the vials of CJC he handed over look like the photo of the photo of Thymomodulin that Wallis claimed
 
I Rock said:
It would be interesting to see the afl position on clubs breaking the law that way.
Click to expand...

The AFL have no position, they're still trying to pretend it's all a bad dream that will just go away. Making money is their forte, running a viable sporting competition is simply beyond their capabilities.
 
Pie eyed said:
Using a food supplement is tantamount to genocide though, I'm surprised it is not illegal, by law, via legislation. You know like illegal drugs.
Coffee too.
Click to expand...
They weren't penalized for a food supplement in the end. Just shows how far off the mark you were in all of this. Like in another universe.......
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top