Vikingnz
Premium Gold
- Mar 11, 2013
- 1,924
- 6,317
- AFL Club
- Richmond
Ladder is an interesting addition thanks Hobbes! Based off that there's value in Port for Top 4 at $4.25 but this week I've gone with Gold Coast to make the 8 at $6.50.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Ladder is an interesting addition thanks Hobbes! Based off that there's value in Port for Top 4 at $4.25 but this week I've gone with Gold Coast to make the 8 at $6.50.
1. Adelaide 17.3
2. GWS 16.3
3. Geelong 15.3
4. Port Adelaide 14.7
5. Richmond 14.6
6. West Coast 13.9
7. Western Bulldogs 13.8
This looks like seven settled finalists
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I am seriously interested in how these things work.GWS +24 v Bulldogs
Hawthorn v St Kilda +7
Carlton v Sydney +10
Brisbane v Port +33
North Melbourne +4 v Gold Coast
West Coast +7 v Fremantle
Essendon +1 v Melbourne
Geelong +29 v Collingwood
Adelaide +31 v Richmond
6/9. I don't think anybody saw Collingwood coming.
1. Adelaide 37.1
2. Port Adelaide 26.4 (+2)
3. GWS 25.5 (-1)
4. Geelong 13.6 (-1)
5. Bulldogs 8.8
6. Richmond 5.3
7. West Coast 2.5
8. St Kilda 1.7 (+3)
9. Collingwood 0.11 (+3)
10. Melbourne 0.05
11. Sydney -5.6 (-3)
12. Essendon -8.4 (-3)
13. Gold Coast -8.7 (+1)
14. North Melbourne -9.7 (+1)
15. Fremantle -10.9 (-2)
16. Carlton -15.4 (+1)
17. Hawthorn -22.0 (-1)
18. Brisbane -27.7
Collingwood, St Kilda and Melbourne put their hands up for finals consideration. Port are looking like a serious contender.
St Kilda v Giants +19
North Melbourne v Adelaide +40
Collingwood +15 v Carlton
Port Adelaide +37 v West Coast
Gold Coast v Geelong +16
Bulldogs +4 v Richmond
Sydney +31 v Brisbane
Melbourne +22 v Hawthorn
Fremantle +6 v Essendon
And the predictive ladder
1. Adelaide 19.7
2. GWS 17.4
3. Port Adelaide 17.3
4. Geelong 14.5
5. Richmond 14.1
6. Bulldogs 13.2
7. West Coast 11.5
8. St Kilda 10.9
9. Melbourne 10.7
10. Collingwood 10.0
11. Essendon 9.4
12. Fremantle 9.3
13. Gold Coast 8.8
14. North Melbourne 7.64
15. Sydney 7.59
16. Carlton 7.3
17. Hawthorn 5.3
18. Brisbane 4.3
I am seriously interested in how these things work.
As I Bulldog supporter, I was very encouraged by our performance against GWS. We also did better than your prediction, but drop away slightly on your model.
I get that 3 of our 2017 opponents fell so devalues our games against them, but 2 of our opponents rose which should add value.
Richmond, received an absolute pasting, but only declined a similar amount.
Your predictive ladder matches most of the current ladderSydney +1 v Western Bulldogs
Adelaide +31 v St Kilda
Hawthorn +4 v Gold Coast
Brisbane v Fremantle +13
Essendon v Port Adelaide +12
Carlton v GWS +21
Melbourne +4 v Collingwood
3/7 in a death round for tipsters. (There must be people who got 1/7, with only Adelaide correct). Feeling smug getting a margin spot on for the second week running - thanks Melbourne.
1. Adelaide 21.9 (+1)
2. Essendon 11.2 (+8)!!
3. Geelong 10.8 (+1)
4. GWS 10.2 (-1)
5. Melbourne 9.9
6. Port Adelaide 9.6 (-5)
7. Sydney 9.2 (+2)
8. Richmond 6.8 (-2)
9. Collingwood 4.4 (-1)
10. Western Bulldogs -0.5 (-3)
11. North Melbourne -1.6 (+1)
12. West Coast -2.5 (-1)
13. Gold Coast -7.6 (+2)
14. Carlton -9.2 (+3)
15. St Kilda -9.9 (-2)
16. Hawthorn -14.7
17. Fremantle -16.1 (-3)
18. Brisbane -24.1
Essendon's surprise thumping of Port Adelaide lifts them eight places and drops Port five places.
West Coast v Geelong +4
North Melbourne +8 v St Kilda
Richmond +3 v Sydney
Port Adelaide +42 v Brisbane
Gold Coast +8 v Carlton
Bulldogs v Melbourne +10
And the predictive ladder
1. Adelaide 15.8 (+1)
2. GWS 15.2 (-1)
3. Geelong 14.6
4. Richmond 13.7 (+1)
5. Port Adelaide 12.7 (-1)
6. Melbourne 12.60 (+1)
7. Essendon 12.56 (+2)
8. Western Bulldogs 11.6 (-2)
9. West Coast 11.4 (-1)
10. Sydney 10.5 (+4)
11. Collingwood 10.1
12. North Melbourne 9.7 (+1)
13. Fremantle 9.2 (-3)
14. St Kilda 9.1 (-2)
15. Gold Coast 8.7
16. Carlton 8.1 (+1)
17. Hawthorn 7.1
18. Brisbane 4.4
There aren't many teams - probably just Adelaide, GWS and Geelong (maybe Richmond) which can take their participation in the finals for granted. Maybe Bulldogs fans fancy their chances from eighth, but they haven't finished as high as 8th yet.
Lord let this come true.Sydney +1 v Western Bulldogs
Adelaide +31 v St Kilda
Hawthorn +4 v Gold Coast
Brisbane v Fremantle +13
Essendon v Port Adelaide +12
Carlton v GWS +21
Melbourne +4 v Collingwood
3/7 in a death round for tipsters. (There must be people who got 1/7, with only Adelaide correct). Feeling smug getting a margin spot on for the second week running - thanks Melbourne.
1. Adelaide 21.9 (+1)
2. Essendon 11.2 (+8)!!
3. Geelong 10.8 (+1)
4. GWS 10.2 (-1)
5. Melbourne 9.9
6. Port Adelaide 9.6 (-5)
7. Sydney 9.2 (+2)
8. Richmond 6.8 (-2)
9. Collingwood 4.4 (-1)
10. Western Bulldogs -0.5 (-3)
11. North Melbourne -1.6 (+1)
12. West Coast -2.5 (-1)
13. Gold Coast -7.6 (+2)
14. Carlton -9.2 (+3)
15. St Kilda -9.9 (-2)
16. Hawthorn -14.7
17. Fremantle -16.1 (-3)
18. Brisbane -24.1
Essendon's surprise thumping of Port Adelaide lifts them eight places and drops Port five places.
West Coast v Geelong +4
North Melbourne +8 v St Kilda
Richmond +3 v Sydney
Port Adelaide +42 v Brisbane
Gold Coast +8 v Carlton
Bulldogs v Melbourne +10
And the predictive ladder
1. Adelaide 15.8 (+1)
2. GWS 15.2 (-1)
3. Geelong 14.6
4. Richmond 13.7 (+1)
5. Port Adelaide 12.7 (-1)
6. Melbourne 12.60 (+1)
7. Essendon 12.56 (+2)
8. Western Bulldogs 11.6 (-2)
9. West Coast 11.4 (-1)
10. Sydney 10.5 (+4)
11. Collingwood 10.1
12. North Melbourne 9.7 (+1)
13. Fremantle 9.2 (-3)
14. St Kilda 9.1 (-2)
15. Gold Coast 8.7
16. Carlton 8.1 (+1)
17. Hawthorn 7.1
18. Brisbane 4.4
There aren't many teams - probably just Adelaide, GWS and Geelong (maybe Richmond) which can take their participation in the finals for granted. Maybe Bulldogs fans fancy their chances from eighth, but they haven't finished as high as 8th yet.
Im reading this thread for the first time.West Coast v Geelong +4
North Melbourne +8 v St Kilda
Richmond +3 v Sydney
Port Adelaide +42 v Brisbane
Gold Coast +8 v Carlton
Bulldogs v Melbourne +10
The wavering form of about half the competition isn't doing me any favours. 2/6. Bring on the proper nine match rounds.
1. Adelaide 18.3
2. Melbourne 15.2 (+3)
3. Sydney 11.1 (+4)
4. Essendon 9.8 (-2)
5. GWS 8.2 (-1)
6. Port Adelaide 8.1
7. Geelong 7.0 (-4)
8. Collingwood 5.1 (+1)
9. Richmond 4.2 (-1)
10. West Coast -2.0 (+2)
11. North Melbourne -5.4
12. Carlton -6.8 (+2)
13. Western Bulldogs -7.6 (-3)
14. St Kilda -8.1 (+1)
15. Gold Coast -9.6 (-2)
16. Hawthorn -11.9
17. Fremantle -14.3
18. Brisbane -23.2
Adelaide +37 v Hawthorn
Sydney +6 v Essendon
Collingwood +3 v Port
Brisbane v GWS +22
Bulldogs v North Melbourne +2
West Coast +12 v Melbourne
Geelong +30 v Fremantle
Richmond +11 v Carlton
St Kilda +8 v Gold Coast
And the predictive ladder
1. Adelaide 15.5
2. GWS 15.0
3. Geelong 13.7
4. Melbourne 13.6 (+2)
5. Richmond 12.9 (-1)
6. Port Adelaide 12.7 (-1)
7. Essendon 12.5
8. West Coast 12.0 (+1)
9. Sydney 11.2 (+1)
10. Western Bulldogs 10.5 (-2)
11. Collingwood 10.2
12. St Kilda 9.9 (+2)
13. Fremantle 9.4
14. Gold Coast 9.04 (+1)
15. Carlton 8.97 (+1)
16. North Melbourne 8.7 (-3)
17. Hawthorn 7.6
18. Brisbane 4.6
Im reading this thread for the first time.
With all due respect your tipping is atrocious
IndeedLong-term predictive capabilities are kind of comparable to the squiggle - Final Siren has done extensive historical testing. There are a couple of modifications this year which are untested, mostly concerning the handling of bye rounds (including finals rounds which a team doesn't play). Really though, the problem is that this has been a bastard of a year for tipsters in general.
Would think the ladder is likely to be more accurate than indiviidual results?Long-term predictive capabilities are kind of comparable to the squiggle - Final Siren has done extensive historical testing. There are a couple of modifications this year which are untested, mostly concerning the handling of bye rounds (including finals rounds which a team doesn't play). Reaoly though, the problem is that this has been a bastard of a year for tipsters in general.