Look at it from a "governance/risk management perspective"
The company who makes the peptide fragment of human growth hormone (known as AOD-9604) tells you its not legal, their is a black market traffic in it for body builders and the drug often comes from dodgy factories in China. You know human growth hormone is a banned performance enhancing drug.
In using this peptide fragment of human growth hormone (known as AOD-9604) you choose to keep it confidential (Black Ops), source the drug from unknown sources (had no idea where Dank was getting it), used off site medical staff to administer it.
You appear to have no written documentation from ASADA (or WADA who sets the code) showing that it was legal to use (not banned under S2 doesn't mean it was legal).
There is no long term Phase 3 Clinical trial data showing that the peptide fragment of human growth hormone is safe. Human growth hormone from which AOD-9604 is derived is associated with Hodgkins Lymphoma.
Yet the club, its management and coaches elect to proceed with the program using a peptide fragment of human growth hormone and you let your employees be injected with higher and more frequent doses than any clinical trial.
Please show me how you a would counter a disrepute finding or which part complies with the AFL Coaches Code of Conduct?
Club will be punished.
Hird - de-registered