Should ASADA form the view at the conclusion of its investigation that a person may have committed an anti-doping rule violation ASADA will follow its established process”.
It is not up to the AFL to initiate doping charges against players
Yes, yes, of course the public servant will say we're going to do x, y and z, putting everyone to sleep, while the AFL continues with the business of running a billion dollar industry - having achieved what they wanted.
Yes, yes, of course the public servant will say we're going to do x, y and z, putting everyone to sleep, while the AFL continues with the business of running a billion dollar industry - having achieved what they wanted.
Sooo you twist the words of an interim announcement to say its over, and yet the independent sports anti drug/performance body comes out and says its not over as it was only an interim report and they have yet to come close to finalising it (or releasing details as such) and you say it all smoke and mirrors?? Gotta love your world.
Yep, everyone is slowly understanding:
* It's over
* S0 is a sham
* AND is an important word
* Climate change is a myth
* Big Brother is actually a decent show
* Aliens occupy senior positions in government (probably on the board of ASADA)
The odds would be higher for that to happen than charges laid at players.
Did you read the whole thing or just cherry pick the bit you thought you could twist?
ASADA has come out and said the AFL's interim decision is not the be all and end all and carries no wait into what they will decide to do when their report is finished
Yes I have read it & your the one quoting from it pal, not me, so twist away
They have said nothing more than exactly what I would expect them to - you are reading way too much into what amounts to no more than a generic statement to the press.
Yep, everyone is slowly understanding:
* It's over
* S0 is a sham
* AND is an important word
* Climate change is a myth
* Big Brother is actually a decent show
* Aliens occupy senior positions in government (probably on the board of ASADA)
Um, it has been a joint investigation mate. The AFL have sat in an ALL interviews. They know everything ASADA know. Yet they still say no infractions are coming under their code without new evidence.
More to the point, infractions aint going to happen till the completion of the investigation - after all relevant evidence and material for potential ADRVs has been examined...
ASADA investigation there are several steps involved such as interviewing appropriate people and gathering relevant evidence of a possible ADRV. The length of this process varies based on unique circumstances and complexity of the investigation. For instance, the discovery of evidence may lead to further avenues of enquiry in an investigation.
Um, it has been a joint investigation mate. The AFL have sat in an ALL interviews. They know everything ASADA know. Yet they still say no infractions are coming under their code without new evidence.
Not entirely correct. They know things they have heard in conjunction with ASADA on that investigation. They possibly won't know things gleaned from other statutory agencies which are not cleared for viewing by anyone else other than cleared agency personnel.
More to the point, infractions aint going to happen till the completion of the investigation - after all relevant evidence and material for potential ADRVs has been examined...
Yep, everyone is slowly understanding:
* It's over
* S0 is a sham
* AND is an important word
* Climate change is a myth * Big Brother is actually a decent show
* Aliens occupy senior positions in government (probably on the board of ASADA)
Not entirely correct. They know things they have heard in conjunction with ASADA on that investigation. They possibly won't know things gleaned from other statutory agencies which are not cleared for viewing by anyone else other than cleared agency personnel.
If you are referring to the ACC report, the full report - ASADA cannot rely on that as evidence - they need to re-gather it themselves - and that's where the AFL comes in -standing on the spot, looking over the shoulder of the ASADA official - reporting back to HQ.
They have come with a mutually convenient outcome for the joint investigation part of the process. Now what ASADA can go and do is take information that wouldn't have been available to any joint investigation involving a non statutory authority.
No they haven't. The AFL have acted on an interim report and ASADA have come out and said they haven't finished their investigations as yet so wont be commenting until its complete. They had nothing to do with the AFL announcement.
If you are referring to the ACC report, the full report - ASADA cannot rely on that as evidence - they need to re-gather it themselves - and that's where the AFL comes in -standing on the spot, looking over the shoulder of the ASADA official - reporting back to HQ.
You might want to check that. A whole new range of verifiable evidence is now available to ASADA that wouldn't have been allowed to be hear in conjunction with the AFL.
No they haven't. The AFL have acted on an interim report and ASADA have come out and said they haven't finished their investigations as yet so wont be commenting until its complete. They had nothing to do with the AFL announcement.
They'll add an executive summary, but there won't be findings that are inconsistent with the AFL's understanding of things - you can take that as read.
You might want to check that. A whole new range of verifiable evidence is now available to ASADA that wouldn't have been allowed to be hear in conjunction with the AFL.
They'll add an executive summary, but there won't be findings that are inconsistent with the AFL's understanding of things - you can take that as read.