Mega Thread All AOD-9604 Discussion - Still Illegal but ASADA will not press charges on AOD9604 - McDevitt

(Log in to remove this ad.)

dymot

Premiership Player
Joined
Dec 4, 2012
Posts
4,832
Likes
2,487
AFL Club
Geelong
Barkly St End 's conclusion that AOD-9064 is not banned under thwe code and to which he can claim vindication from has been specifically and categorically quashed by the former head of ASADA Richard Ings today on SEN where he has reiterated that WADA has said the substance is banned under the code S0 and secondly infractions may be issued at a later time as there is the possibility that an ASADA investigation might go on for another several months as 9 monnths is what it takes up to for certain ASADA doping cases with proof or record of an injection taking place of the banned substance to be investigated/prosecuted.
 

Football Pope

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Sep 24, 2009
Posts
7,946
Likes
3,648
Location
Right here
AFL Club
Brisbane Lions
Other Teams
Australian International Sides
You think? Remember they have interviewed each of these guys for several days each
Yep..... and have been charged by the AFL on that per the interim ASADA information/investigation... Paul Little has said that they are going to vigorously defend those charges... In defending that, there will be stuff not mentioned at the ASADA investigation that will come out..
 

rumply

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Apr 11, 2002
Posts
16,778
Likes
16,400
Location
Under Her Eye
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
Iggles, 76ers
Barkly St End 's conclusion that AOD-9064 is not banned under thwe code and to which he can claim vindication from has been specifically and categorically quashed by the former head of ASADA Richard Ings today on SEN where he has reiterated that WADA has said the substance is banned under the code S0 and secondly infractions may be issued at a later time as there is the possibility that an ASADA investigation might go on for another several months as 9 monnths is what it takes up to for certain ASADA doping cases with proof or record of an injection taking place of the banned substance to be investigated/prosecuted.


lol, no, just no:rolleyes:

- here's a fun fact for you - Ing's is not employed by ASADA or WADA or any organisation of importance in this matter

& another fun fact in case you have been under a rock - it is without dispute that during 2012 ASADA told anyone that asked (including an AFL drug rep) that AOD9604 was not prohibited.

So if it wasn't for the inconvenience etc I would enjoy seeing WADA 'come over the top' & rub players out - ASADA being backed federally would make the ensuing law suits look like the proverbial pot of gold at the end of the rainbow.
 
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Posts
2,286
Likes
1,810
Location
Kicking it up the guts
AFL Club
Fremantle
I think they had a pretty good idea they would be charged (one way or another) when they were interviewed. This has been a very slow moving train.
I saw Bomber's reaction on AFL360 when Robbo told him he thought he would be charged and he looked genuinely shocked at the prospect. He also spoke strongly about not having this tarnish his reputation. Somebody at ASADA should be giving him the opportunity of a follow up interview to add things he may have forgotten.
 

dymot

Premiership Player
Joined
Dec 4, 2012
Posts
4,832
Likes
2,487
AFL Club
Geelong
lol - here's a fun fact for you - Ing's is not employed by ASADA or WADA or any organisation of importance in this matter

& another fun fact in case you have been under a rock - it is without dispute that during 2012 ASADA told anyone that asked (including an AFL drug rep) that AOD9604 was not prohibited.

So if it wasn't for the inconvenience etc I would enjoy seeing WADA 'come over the top' & rub players out - ASADA being backed federally would make the ensuing law suits look like winning lotto several times over.
WADA has said it is banned. WADA has a high record of challenging infraction notics et al where the rules they have set have been not properly enforced by a body representing an individual state.

Secondly Ings has a lot of credibility on the issue as he knows better than anyone here how WADA and ASADA work and what goes on in their processes. TThis seems much the same brush Essendon fans wanted to use with the WeaPON when he gave his interview as he was just a disgruntled ex employee despite his comments ahving a lot of truth to them, seeming very legitimate and filling in a lot ofg holes in stories especially from the Essendon end and angle :oops:.
 

rumply

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Apr 11, 2002
Posts
16,778
Likes
16,400
Location
Under Her Eye
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
Iggles, 76ers
WADA has said it is banned. WADA has a high record of challenging infraction notics et al where the rules they have set have been not properly enforced by a body representing an individual state.

Secondly Ings has a lot of credibility on the issue as he knows better than anyone here how WADA and ASADA work and what goes on in their processes. TThis seems much the same brush Essendon fans wanted to use with the WeaPON when he gave his interview as he was just a disgruntled ex employee despite his comments ahving a lot of truth to them, seeming very legitimate and filling in a lot ofg holes in stories especially from the Essendon end and angle :oops:.


Dude, clearly ASADA are not infallible & ****** up badly here (not that they are the only ones). Now WADA are far for being the omnipotent entity so many believe they are, & are required just like any enforcement agency to ensure natural justice is served.

If you don't see an issue with being told one thing & later being told another, well thats just sad & I don't believe anyone that says they would put up with it if it happened to them. You would fight it all the way & would be nuts not to.
 

coryne

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Dec 15, 2008
Posts
9,209
Likes
6,997
Location
melbourne
AFL Club
Carlton
They'll add an executive summary, but there won't be findings that are inconsistent with the AFL's understanding of things - you can take that as read.


Ahhhh BSE, has your good mate Hird lent you his copy of the interim report to get your expert legal advice as to how to proceed now he is being charged ????
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

rfctiger74

Premium Platinum
Joined
Aug 22, 2009
Posts
43,914
Likes
81,632
AFL Club
Richmond
Other Teams
76'ers
Yep..... and have been charged by the AFL on that per the interim ASADA information/investigation... Paul Little has said that they are going to vigorously defend those charges... In defending that, there will be stuff not mentioned at the ASADA investigation that will come out..

You don't think they would have mentioned stuff that could get them off during the initial interviews?

Thats like being busted for murder, and deciding to release your alibi 6 months into your murder trial
 

rfctiger74

Premium Platinum
Joined
Aug 22, 2009
Posts
43,914
Likes
81,632
AFL Club
Richmond
Other Teams
76'ers
I saw Bomber's reaction on AFL360 when Robbo told him he thought he would be charged and he looked genuinely shocked at the prospect. He also spoke strongly about not having this tarnish his reputation. Somebody at ASADA should be giving him the opportunity of a follow up interview to add things he may have forgotten.

I think it was more due to Bomber thinking he was too peripheral to all of this to get the same attention as the others on this (a lot of the recent reports had him as against the Dank program while he was there).
 

Football Pope

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Sep 24, 2009
Posts
7,946
Likes
3,648
Location
Right here
AFL Club
Brisbane Lions
Other Teams
Australian International Sides
You don't think they would have mentioned stuff that could get them off during the initial interviews?

Thats like being busted for murder, and deciding to release your alibi 6 months into your murder trial
No doubt...They also didn't have to say anything at the ASADA interviews...On the other side to that, you don't think they would be careful not to mentioned stuff if it was self incriminating?..
 

Woodie99

Premium Platinum
Joined
Oct 10, 2012
Posts
1,140
Likes
532
AFL Club
Sydney
Other Teams
Knights & Jets
lol, no, just no:rolleyes:

- here's a fun fact for you - Ing's is not employed by ASADA or WADA or any organisation of importance in this matter

& another fun fact in case you have been under a rock - it is without dispute that during 2012 ASADA told anyone that asked (including an AFL drug rep) that AOD9604 was not prohibited.

So if it wasn't for the inconvenience etc I would enjoy seeing WADA 'come over the top' & rub players out - ASADA being backed federally would make the ensuing law suits look like the proverbial pot of gold at the end of the rainbow.
Would like a link to this fact, or is it S2.
 

rfctiger74

Premium Platinum
Joined
Aug 22, 2009
Posts
43,914
Likes
81,632
AFL Club
Richmond
Other Teams
76'ers
They're your words...Again there will be information that will come out that wasn't mentioned before!
Anything they say though will be distancing themselves from dank and the program.

Asada need a direct link between a specific prohibited substance, and a specific player/s. how will providing this info assist a defence that you were not involved in the efc supplement program?
 
Top Bottom