Mega Thread All AOD-9604 Discussion - Still Illegal but ASADA will not press charges on AOD9604 - McDevitt

jinny1

Club Legend
Joined
Feb 20, 2010
Posts
1,913
Likes
182
Location
Medius de Nusquam
AFL Club
Melbourne
See Calzada

http://calzada.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/132F042F2012103A223A05PM.pdf

Remember they are a listed company so jail time if they make things up.

So it's not even completely "proven" yet that AOD-9604 is performance enhancing??

That link really doesn't do anything for me as it isn't a published academic journal with references. There is no way for anybody to verify and cross-check their data and methods. They are a private company with a vested interest in the industry...I would rather trust an open academic journal conducted by people not hired by any pharmaceutical company..

Lol it seems that calzada had a sample size of 6 humans for their research....Their data is basically negligible garbage...

http://jme.endocrinology-journals.org/content/25/3/287.long
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Gavstar

Premiership Player
Joined
Sep 15, 2011
Posts
3,588
Likes
4,487
AFL Club
Carlton
Other Teams
Liverpool FC, Lakers, Longhorns
So it's not even completely "proven" yet that AOD-9604 is performance enhancing??
In one case WADA argued that the use of anti-obesity drugs as performance enhancing for team sports. Sports that use skin folds as KPI's?

Calzada will probably never take the alleged "muscle enhancing" further in clinical development as they likely don't want their product to be "prohibited" by WADA as they may put off customers.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Boxhead_31

Rompinwins is my Chauffeur
Joined
Oct 12, 2007
Posts
32,456
Likes
41,669
Location
This Drinking Team has a Football Problem
AFL Club
Geelong
Other Teams
South BHFL, 49ers
can someone explain what happened on 360 for those who arent watching it?
They clarified that ASADA were originally looking at AOD as falling under S2 and as such it cannot fall under S0 and people cannot be charged under S0
 

The Prosecutor

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Sep 13, 2011
Posts
9,379
Likes
11,409
AFL Club
Essendon
can someone explain what happened on 360 for those who arent watching it?
ASADA had advised everyone in documented form that each substance must be considered for S1-9 before S0 can be applied.

ASADA considered AOD under S2 which they considered not prohibited, therefore, S0 is not applicable to AOD9604.
 

Defacto

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Sep 21, 2008
Posts
22,934
Likes
16,937
AFL Club
St Kilda
They clarified that ASADA were originally looking at AOD as falling under S2 and as such it cannot fall under S0 and people cannot be charged under S0

so just to be clear the defence that AOD is not banned is because essendon asked about it being prohibited. asada say no under S2, so S0 is not applicable?
 
Top Bottom