I agree that the exchange between ASADA and Dank is an entirely different kettle of fish. On that front, I am (conveniently) taking what was reported by AFL 360 tonight as an approximation of the exchange between Dank and ASADA.
My point is that it seems pretty clear from the exchange that WADA's take home message was 'we don't know, ask ASADA' Do you see it the same way?
I do, but in all this time the
one bit of evidence that clears Essendon of this whole AOD fiasco has not been produced beyond a few verbal claims. Those verbal claims have been denied by the governing body on several occasions, in fact they went so far as to state they could have provided an electronic receipt even if Dank lost the advice. They have no such receipt. There is no recorded or official exchange between ASADA and Dank ever of been produced. In fact the only semi bit of evidence on AOD-9604 use was from its manufactures.
If there was such evidence and Dank had it, Essendon would be beating down his door to get it every day.
WADA answered the direct questions given by Dank, then went beyond that to inform him to check the status in Australia as it may fall under S0. There is no record of a conversation between Dank and ASADA except from Dank and a couple of claims from other Essendon officials. Where is it?
Present it and the S0 argument is off the table. Till then
"I could not find that it had been approved by any government regulatory health authority." means it falls under S0.