Is it delusion or lack of comprehension ability that prevents you from digesting the information?
It's all laid out in plain language for the general football watching moron.
Watch it again and you may find your question in answered.
AOD does not fall under s2, it does not mean it is not prohibited under s0. Don't worry about what is on 360, read the clause for s0. any substances that have not passed clinical trials are prohibited under s0. Just because it is not banned as a peptide this does not mitigate the fact it was not approved for human use..There is no exception to this.
one side of the fence is essendon saying but they said it was ok, dank said so, our consultant said so
vs
asada/ wada saying it is not permitted, they have never given such advice, they have put in writing that it is banned in various statements, they have also got it in the code if it is not approved for human use it is category s0 which corresponds to the reports on AOD.
But apparently another essendon paid consultant going on tv show trying to get a scoop is a reliable source..
The players deserve to be cleared but if essendon use these types of arguments good luck to them in trying..The point I am trying to make is that ASADA & WADA are willing to refer to documented factual evidence, Essendon are basing there argument on here say from a questionable internally paid consultant..
Get it now..