Hearing Panther have pulled their girls side.
-
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
All Divisions General NFNL Discussion Thread
- Thread starter Denny Crane
- Start date
- Tagged users None
NorthernBastard
Team Captain
- Aug 15, 2019
- 588
- 580
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Not actually Richmond
NFNL struggling to compete with VAFA women's comp.
- May 3, 2015
- 2,950
- 6,788
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Cubs Blackhawks Fulham Ivanhoe FC
Wonder if it’s because the girls would prefer their games on Saturdays
Course they would but VAFA doesn’t supply umpires. I’m sure the NFNL would have no issue with Saturday games provided clubs find umpires. Unfortunately that’s the big road block in the all this
- Nov 2, 2006
- 1,242
- 1,456
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
They supply felid umpires for all womens VAFA games. Boundary and goal easy to find.
Some womens games will be played next year on a Saturday as the AFL Vic 'fair access' rule will come into play ie: womens sport must have access to Saturday scheduling. So some adjustment coming for clubs for sure.
NFNL Member
Team Captain
- May 17, 2023
- 426
- 187
- AFL Club
- Tasmania
Was told by a parent of a player that at a Junior Rep trial game v EDFL during the week there was 1 set of jumpers to be shared by 4 teams, no football for one game, no medics arranged or water carriers.
Imagine the fines allocated to a club for those infractions!!
In all seriousness, wouldnt be too happy about your kid wearing a jumper that other kids had sweat in , snotted on etc etc.
Staggering.
Imagine the fines allocated to a club for those infractions!!
In all seriousness, wouldnt be too happy about your kid wearing a jumper that other kids had sweat in , snotted on etc etc.
Staggering.
They call all be played on Saturdays, just need umpires and play the opposite week on their men’s sides.
But good luck finding enough umpires for that when there is already a massive shortage.
Can someone from the NFNL update the transfer page!
- Aug 24, 2008
- 1,971
- 902
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Other Teams
- Arsenal
- Thread starter
- #934
I received this in an email from NFNL.
Hi,
Thanks for your concern about the transfers page.
Unfortunately, the NFNL headquarters has been busy the last few days compiling and uploading the Tribunal listings. This task achieved the FPI we needed to tick off for the week.
We will look at the transfers page next week unless more pesky tribunal thingys need to be done.
Now, back to fines
Yours in uselessness
The NFNL Team
- Aug 24, 2008
- 1,971
- 902
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Other Teams
- Arsenal
- Thread starter
- #935
Any PlayHQ expert explain what a Private Player is? I have noticed this when looking at a few teams.
When you hover over the
it just states that his player has a private account.
WTF
When you hover over the
it just states that his player has a private account.WTF
Last few days uploading? Must be hard to do that with a push of a couple of buttons. Thats one off the most humourous things Ive seen in regards to an excuse. 5 Cases to put up into a spreadsheet . Morons.
Players can choose to be private which IMO is BS and should be changed.Any PlayHQ expert explain what a Private Player is? I have noticed this when looking at a few teams.
When you hover over the
WTF
View attachment 1962880
Slip a ring-in into the team, call him a private player, get away with it. Simple.
But that might mean a missed opportunity for the NFNL to fine someone or set up a tribunal LOL.
But that might mean a missed opportunity for the NFNL to fine someone or set up a tribunal LOL.
Fizzler
BBTB
- Dec 26, 2013
- 12,764
- 16,356
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- OKC, Coburg, Werribee, Storm, QPR
I don't think it's used as a way to get around anything, some players just want privacy. I wanted to find Peter Malinauskas' stats from Adelaide Uni and he was listed as a private player. Obviously there are circumstances why he would be one, but I'm sure this player has a reason as well.
Opposition teams should be entitled to see who they are playing against it’s absolutely ridiculous players should be able to hide their name. Soon we will see 22 “private players” listed.
Seen it in junior sports, when a child's safety is at risk but never seen it in seniors
Son of a Butcher
Debutant
- Jan 21, 2023
- 81
- 65
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Hurstbridge seniors with a "private player" listed on their line-up on playhq for this week's game
Bullants U18
Premium Platinum
- Mar 5, 2009
- 23
- 2
- AFL Club
- Richmond
Only listed as private on the public site. NFNL, club and live scoring admins will be able to see the players name.
wasn’t an issue with gameday.. why is it required now
