First BF then the world!I'll support your overthrow of Chief if we implement a Newspeak where these terms are banned.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
First BF then the world!I'll support your overthrow of Chief if we implement a Newspeak where these terms are banned.
Brb - need to change pantsI can just see it now.....A glossary of terms all indexed & ranked, with an accompanying thought-crime punishment.
Soy-latte.....Day off.
Almond Yak milk.....Week off.
Melty snowflake....2 weeks.
Dialectical materialism....3 weeks.
Milos 4 POTUS......Lifetime Ban.
Bigot...1 weekI can just see it now.....A glossary of terms all indexed & ranked, with an accompanying thought-crime punishment.
Soy-latte.....Day off.
Almond Yak milk.....Week off.
Melty snowflake....2 weeks.
Dialectical materialism....3 weeks.
Milos 4 POTUS......Lifetime Ban.
There's a reason people call you all 3 though.Bigot...1 week
Racist....2 weeks
Nazi....Life ban
Fine by me comradeThere's a reason people call you all 3 though.
Has anyone read Kill All Normies?
I'm about halfway through it.
Well, we are in a thread about the Alt-right, P35..4-chan, internet culture & meme-wars.....meh, pass.
Well, we are in a thread about the Alt-right, P35.
Reading about the differences between the Alt-right and how they use alt-lighters like Milo as useful idiots has been pretty interesting.
Although, my favourite comment was the author mentioning that people don't care about liberal politicians conducting drone strikes as long as they support gay marriage and people forgive conservative politicians destroying families provided they try to take down unions.
Yeah, I did read that review before I started reading the book tonight.Oh yes....Absolutely....The meh was rather more about the so-called internet culture-war scene, re 4chan, tumblr, breitbart, Reddit et al.
Here's one of those 'negative' reviews if you're interested: I've inscluded a snippet that encompasses the gist of it.
https://www.counterpunch.org/2017/08/30/kill-all-normies-is-an-awful-book/
"Nagles' effort, which portrays itself as both opposed to the alt-right and racism, is actually neither and can very easily be described as either a truly bad case of political journalism lacking any grasp of American politics or alternatively a moderate liberal’s plea for free speech absolutism. Let’s be clear, we need a very detailed and mature analysis of the alt-right that helps us get a handle on what we are facing. Sadly Nagle is obviously incapable of doing this."
Yeah, I did read that review before I started reading the book tonight.
The author of that article seems to be incensed that the book is not a ranting and raving attack on the alt-right. I think that Nagle gives credit to those she considers intelligent within the Alt-right probably bothers the Counter Punch writer.
I heard Nagle on a podcast last night so decided to check the book out. It's a nice, easy read and fits the basis of what most SRP discussions descend into.
The only thing cringier than people using terms like 'soy boy' and 'triggered' is to watch people try to co-opt those terms the other way.
Ugh.
If only these terms were banned entirely. ShanDog, humour me?
The US has gone about it all wrong with their fixation on waterboarding!Hehe didn’t take long
One of us. One of us.
What was the justification for that claim? Before the Russians helped convince so many right-wingers to care about drones, the loudest ones complaining about Obama's strikes were lefties. Is "destroying families" a reference to conservatives having affairs or multiple marriages?Although, my favourite comment was the author mentioning that people don't care about liberal politicians conducting drone strikes as long as they support gay marriage and people forgive conservative politicians destroying families provided they try to take down unions.
This is harder to recall given it's been a few months since I read the book. I think she basically argued that a lot of people are willing to ignore things like the expanded powers of CIA or FBI or whatever under Obama, as long as the more populist issues of gender pay gaps etc are noted. I think she expressed sadness that a lot of people will vote for politicians despite their complicity in so many people dying internationally.What was the justification for that claim? Before the Russians helped convince so many right-wingers to care about drones, the loudest ones complaining about Obama's strikes were lefties. Is "destroying families" a reference to conservatives having affairs or multiple marriages?
Thanks for clarifying. It sounds like pretty weak sauce. It's practical to think 'I will vote for the side that believes in more of the things I believe in than the other'. Rarely will someone find a party that mirrors their full beliefs, and of course those discussions happen within parties all the time.This is harder to recall given it's been a few months since I read the book. I think she basically argued that a lot of people are willing to ignore things like the expanded powers of CIA or FBI or whatever under Obama, as long as the more populist issues of gender pay gaps etc are noted. I think she expressed sadness that a lot of people will vote for politicians despite their complicity in so many people dying internationally.
Yeah, the conservative aspect was probably to the hypocrisy in preaching the sanctity of marriage while looking the other way re: infidelity. I think it went a step further in noting the cognitive dissonance in promoting 'family values' while cutting funding to programmes necessary for families. Or, to take it a step further, dividing families by deporting some members.
Shooter did not have a private security license
The security company named by the media group have no record of the shooter working for them
Better deflector shields next time