- Jan 16, 2016
- AFL Club
Again, just deflecting . Citing something completely irrelevant just to put me down Then play the victim when your called out. Deaths in custody is not the topic!!Why did I cite you? I knew you didn’t make comment on deaths in custody, but it’s drawing a parallel of where agenda driven activists effectively lie and ignore data that does exist.
Well done for restating the limitations and logic jumps that I clearly stated I had to make in my content.
Well done on avoiding any comment on the parts that you don’t like.
Cherry picking level is elite.
This is why it is hard to take you seriously, or anyone else who ignores things that may change or challenge their view.
That’s called a bigot.
I am very happy to have my view changed if there is compelling evidence.
Any argument that claims, due to identitity factors you assume about me, I am unable to understand, is racist or any other “ist” you can pick depending on the identity factor you’re choosing.
Requiring compelling evidence to form or change an opinion is scientific and is the opposite of being a “ist”.
If there was a reputable study that had data on police resources spent on missing persons, and it showed an unexplainable difference for indigenous vs. others with similar attributes aside from indigenous statuses, then I would conclude racism is a significant factor driving the decisions being made to generate different outcomes.
If that study existed and showed, like deaths in custody and the very limited missing person data I found, that outcomes for indigenous are very similar to non-indigenous with similar attributes, would you accept racism isn’t a major factor?
There is no connection between deaths in custody and the investigations of missing children, end of story . You are drawing such a long bow yet you dismiss a policeman with direct field experience commenting on this specific case. This is what is ridiculous .
Be consistent, you demand facts then waffle on about the vaguest connections being relevant. Makes no sense!!
Highlighting you nonsensical approach is not being as bigot, you shutting down discussion on the missing aboriginal children not getting the same policing because you want info that is not available when blind Freddy can see remote communities do not get any of the same quality of services the rest of Australia gets, that is bigotry.
Let me know when you want to discuss Ms Franklins on point comment regarding missing aboriginal children not getting the same police involvement as white kids. I won’t hold my breathe.