Remove this Banner Ad

NO TROLLS Another AFL player charged with sexual assault

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Nice little court case against the AFL very easily then for defamation against the AFL if they are found not guilty
Mate, this is what happens in other sports (i.e. players are stood down while under this investigation) and there isn't a defamation lawsuit going on there AFAIK.

You cannot have someone on an active rape charge playing AFL, it's pretty much unthinkable and the crowd reaction would make Adam Goodes look like the world's most popular man.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Why do people buy into the lie that HUN cannot name the player? Its simply not true. They are not naming him cos the AFL asked them not too. Thats it
It is extremely common for media outlets to not be able to name rape suspects for legal reasons, especially high profile ones. Don't forget, for ages Bruce Lehrmann was being referred to as "high profile Toowoomba man" due to the concurrent legal cases running against him.
 
Mate, this is what happens in other sports (i.e. players are stood down while under this investigation) and there isn't a defamation lawsuit going on there AFAIK.

You cannot have someone on an active rape charge playing AFL, it's pretty much unthinkable and the crowd reaction would make Adam Goodes look like the world's most popular man.
Especially when the personm has kinda been named to the point people are going to assume the situation here.

Its why not naming him is just so stupid
 
Of course but its what will happen though.
Anyway, there is a long-established legal precedent of not naming the accused publicly, and it's done with good reason as elaborated on by others throughout this thread.

If the papers could name the alleged perp, they would do so in a heartbeat. It would sell a hell of a lot of papers.
 
Andrew Lovett was sacked when he was charged with rape, was later acquitted. Steven Milne played when charged with rape and was booed and later plead guilty to a lesser charge. Precedent for both
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Andrew Lovett was sacked when he was charged with rape, was later acquitted. Steven Milne played when charged with rape and was booed and later plead guilty to a lesser charge. Precedent for both
I don't think that Milne would play now. Two decades ago - might as well have been a lifetime ago.
 
Nah need to stand whoever it is down. Can't have fans cheering on a person with such serious charges playing on the playing field.

So guilty and punishment before any hearings.

Then gets found not guilty and sues for loss of earnings and reputational damage.

So a lose lose situation no matter which way it goes.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Sure, but the heavy hint from the article is that it is one of our players.
If the name being thrown about on FB over the weekend has any credibility then the 'Geelong FC' connection is a red herring.
 
Last edited:
There has been many contradictory articles (in that what's actually alledged here and laws). The charges of rape and sexual assault seem to have somewhat merged in different states . Thou historically have meant very different things.
Anyway this guy has been charged with rape. Under Vic law.
On balance should be stood down. It is a very serious charge.
But one things for certain the court system is way too slow. 2 years before trial (minimum) is too slow
 

Remove this Banner Ad

NO TROLLS Another AFL player charged with sexual assault

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top