That is hardly an upside one iota if true. I mean, lets be realistic here. How many players does any one club have on their veterans list at any one time. On average the total would have to be 2-3 surely. (I have no evidence to back this up)
If my guesstimate is close to being correct, that equates to only $300K relief from salary cap pressure. How is that an upside when you compare Sandilands and Pavlich on at least $800K each, meaning $800K will be free from the salary cap thus easing pressure of fitting the every player under the cap.
This, in my opinion is a stupid idea by the AFL just to help facilitate free agency in the future. I will not be happy at all if this is true and it will make it so much harder for players to remain one club players. That would be incredibly sad and a blight on our competition
No offence at all to you Baltimore Jack but I sincerely hope you are wrong or at least your finer details are way off the mark.
Unfortunately it appears to be true. The 50% outside cap has been scrapped come 2013 season and only a percentage of the TPP per player is recorded as a veterans allowance outside the salary cap.
The only figure that has been mentioned (source: The Age) is $100,000 per player per year.
I'm really hoping it's about 0.5% or 1% per player. That is around $450/$900k per year.
I think the $100k per year may be more in line with what the AFL want because that disadvantages us, Geelong and Hawthorn. Teams that have been near the top for a while.



