Another US mass shooting

Remove this Banner Ad

Which amendments need to the amended to make the guns go away?

"You have the right to bare arms for the purposes of sport, hunting or professional circumstances"

Instead of

"You have the right to bare arms SO YOU CAN SHOOT THE GOVERNMENT YEE HAW LETS ALL HAVE WEAPONS!"
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Semi automatic rifles are used for sport,hunting or professional purposes

Yes, and people who use them for that would be able to have them.

Joe Blogs wouldnt be able to wander down to his local gun store and pick one up for personal defense or shooting cans on the weekend for shits and giggles.
 
Just make them illegal and they all disappear:p
Buy back amnesty then confiscate if found. Reward snitching. What good would be having the AR gun if you can’t show it off? If they are hidden and never seen then they aren’t being used.

Oh and 10000% bullet tax with exemption for farmers/ rural need pest control.
 
Yes, and people who use them for that would be able to have them.

Joe Blogs wouldnt be able to wander down to his local gun store and pick one up for personal defense or shooting cans on the weekend for shits and giggles.
In a clumsy way I think he is trying to make a point about how hard it would be to get the wording right of the amendment.
I would word it
“You have a right to apply to bear arms for personal defence or recreation but this is subject to limitation by what federal and state law deems reasonable. In general this will limit use to non automatic handguns and rifles. There will be a permit system administered by the government”
 
Buy back amnesty then confiscate if found. Reward snitching. What good would be having the AR gun if you can’t show it off? If they are hidden and never seen then they aren’t being used.

Oh and 10000% bullet tax with exemption for farmers/ rural need pest control.
20 million + AR based firearms in a buyback.What about the AK based?
Other semi autos?
Then you use a line from Chris Rock
 
In a clumsy way I think he is trying to make a point about how hard it would be to get the wording right of the amendment.
I would word it
“You have a right to apply to bear arms for personal defence or recreation but this is subject to limitation by what federal and state law deems reasonable. In general this will limit use to non automatic handguns and rifles. There will be a permit system administered by the government”
Full or semi automatic?
Did you just go from rifles to applying your law to all firearms?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Wait, its alright, Trump is all over it:

“Earlier today, a wicked murderer opened fire at a Molson Coors brewing company plant, taking the lives of (several) people,” Mr Trump said.

“Our hearts break for them and their loved ones.”


Well thats that sorted, back to work everyone! Enjoy your amendment rights! Bill in the mail for any of you needing hospital assistant for bullet wounds.
 
Wait, its alright, Trump is all over it:

“Earlier today, a wicked murderer opened fire at a Molson Coors brewing company plant, taking the lives of (several) people,” Mr Trump said.

“Our hearts break for them and their loved ones.”


Well thats that sorted, back to work everyone! Enjoy your amendment rights! Bill in the mail for any of you needing hospital assistant for bullet wounds.
Makes sense - their hearts are broken so much, that they no longer function.
 
How has a country so intricately linked the owning of devices designed to kill quickly with the feeling of freedom? We dont live in tribes anymore, we dont fight wild animals for food, we dont have to defend from other invading villages, we are meant to be in a civilized society yet we still feel the need to carry around a club thats bigger and better than our neighbours.

It's not about that, it's about the threat of tyranny and the citizenry having the means to defend themselves from a corrupt government.
 
It's not about that, it's about the threat of tyranny and the citizenry having the means to defend themselves from a corrupt government.

So you're confident the people in America, right now, could flip the tables on the highest budget military in the entire world?
 
So you're confident the people in America, right now, could flip the tables on the highest budget military in the entire world?

No, that would take most of the entire population to be armed and working in unison, which would never happen. If there was an uprising it would be group(s) of isolated militia who could be identified and targeted.
 
No, that would take most of the entire population to be armed and working in unison, which would never happen. If there was an uprising it would be group(s) of isolated militia who could be identified and targeted.

But yet people should be allowed to arm themselves to stupid levels for this possible scenario?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top