Current Anthony Munro - Paedophile & POI in unsolved SA childrens disappearance

Bograt

Rookie
May 12, 2020
39
20
AFL Club
Geelong
Thanks. I haven't noticed it, I'll have a look.
What I will say is that I had no contact with that partner until well after Munro was back in Adelaide... more than 18 months after... and then it was a single brief phone call so I could assure that grub knew he too was to be served justice for destroying young lives. Fyi, I also had no contact with AM until Dec 9, 2016.
My initial interest in Munro stemmed from the information provided to me by Max. David Smith also gave information which supported my interest in Munro for the Beaumont abduction.
Regardless of my thoughts on the possibility of Munro being involved in the Beaumont abduction, it was very clear to me from a raft of information from a number victims - SCIB Detectives commented it was some of the most compelling evidence provided for an historic abuse case - that Munro would be convicted of child sex abuse if he was to face court here.
It was also apparent he had great opportunity to hurt more children where he was in Cambodia, in the city where I have treasured family.
My motivation was to bring Munro to justice for his abhorrent crimes and, strongly supported by people you may not expect, I did all I could to help make that happen.
I must question the motives of those who continue to show support for Munro.... a convicted pedophile who preyed on children from the early '60s through to the '90s at the very least.... before taking his millions and fleeing to Cambodia where there was no extradition treaty and it is a well known pedophile haven. And setting up orphanages/school programs. Anyone who believes that was in good faith is in dreamland. The leaders of those programs admit they were hoodwinked by that creep.
 

GreyCrow

TheBrownDog
Mar 21, 2016
51,809
77,385
Down South Corvus Tristis
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
Sturt, Redskins , White Sox
Bringing the thread back on track

Munro is a POS but he is not the Beaumont kidnapper. Never is and never was

The lead investigator on the Beaumont case, Detective Senior Sergeant David Sheridan of the South Australia Police’s major crime investigation branch, has previously said that three independent probes into the claims against Mr. Munro and Max McIntyre have shown that there is “absolutely no evidence that they’re involved.”
 

shellyg

Moderator
Dec 27, 2016
9,891
20,214
AFL Club
Western Bulldogs
Bringing the thread back on track

Munro is a POS but he is not the Beaumont kidnapper. Never is and never was

The lead investigator on the Beaumont case, Detective Senior Sergeant David Sheridan of the South Australia Police’s major crime investigation branch, has previously said that three independent probes into the claims against Mr. Munro and Max McIntyre have shown that there is “absolutely no evidence that they’re involved.”
There's another article out there that uses the word 'cleared' on Munro.

Head of the investigation, which I didn't want to post due to sensitivities around this thing, that asserts the McIntyre's claims on the Beaumont Children have no credibility and particularly given their claims about other various murders.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

GreyCrow

TheBrownDog
Mar 21, 2016
51,809
77,385
Down South Corvus Tristis
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
Sturt, Redskins , White Sox
There's another article out there that uses the word 'cleared' on Munro.

Head of the investigation, which I didn't want to post due to sensitivities around this thing, that asserts the McIntyre's claims on the Beaumont Children have no credibility given their claims about other various murders.
There are/were competing claims about the Beaumont Children

The various suspects named ie Percy , Wilder etc

Then there is a smaller but louder subset of SA families all competing for the same attention


Mcintyre, Phipps , Hart/Marshall

To paraphrase Dire Straits - one of them says they are the murderer , 2 of them must be wrong
 

shellyg

Moderator
Dec 27, 2016
9,891
20,214
AFL Club
Western Bulldogs
There are/were competing claims about the Beaumont Children

The various suspects named ie Percy , Wilder etc

Then there is a smaller but louder subset of SA families all competing for the same attention


Mcintyre, Phipps , Hart/Marshall

To paraphrase Dire Straits - one of them says they are the murderer , 2 of them must be wrong
Given the history, it's hardly fair imo to harass or attack anybody that might question the veracity of the current set of claims being made in the public domain especially when some of them are so offensive to be nuts.
 

Bograt

Rookie
May 12, 2020
39
20
AFL Club
Geelong
You a cop then GreyCrow... (snip)
You a cop then GreyCrow... (snip)
The "no evidence" line is based on a single interview where Munro declined to speak.... that's straight from Sheridan's mouth. The no evidence claim came two weeks after the head of Major Crime claimed absolutely no knowledge of Munro. Of course that is unlikely given he was convicted in 1991 for pedophile crimes and surely, his victim being a Glenelg Scout, our on the ball police would've applied some consideration to the possibility he knew something about the abduction... given his locality and clear desire for children! After all, that's why Phipps is considered... even without a conviction for pedophilia
 

shellyg

Moderator
Dec 27, 2016
9,891
20,214
AFL Club
Western Bulldogs
The "no evidence" line is based on a single interview where Munro declined to speak.... that's straight from Sheridan's mouth. The no evidence claim came two weeks after the head of Major Crime claimed absolutely no knowledge of Munro. Of course that is unlikely given he was convicted in 1991 for pedophile crimes and surely, his victim being a Glenelg Scout, our on the ball police would've applied some consideration to the possibility he knew something about the abduction... given his locality and clear desire for children! After all, that's why Phipps is considered... even without a conviction for pedophilia
If you don't mind, how old was Munro's youngest victim at the time of the offending?
 

Bograt

Rookie
May 12, 2020
39
20
AFL Club
Geelong
DSS David Sheridan is - he says they are cleared

Do you dispute him?
I dispute the fact DSS Sheridan says Munro is "cleared" .... certainly not what DSS Sheridan has told me when meeting with him on this matter.
That's the problem when you rely on Google and listen to others with misguided agendas to inform your comments... you say things like people don't exist, they're made up to fit a story.... the kind of mistakes hobby sleuths make.
 

GreyCrow

TheBrownDog
Mar 21, 2016
51,809
77,385
Down South Corvus Tristis
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
Sturt, Redskins , White Sox
I dispute the fact DSS Sheridan says Munro is "cleared" .... certainly not what DSS Sheridan has told me when meeting with him on this matter.
That's the problem when you rely on Google and listen to others with misguided agendas to inform your comments... you say things like people don't exist, they're made up to fit a story.... the kind of mistakes hobby sleuths make.
The quoted piece doesnt say cleared. Says there is no evidence. 3 times

As to misguided agendas informing peoples comments . Pot.Kettle.Black
 

Bograt

Rookie
May 12, 2020
39
20
AFL Club
Geelong
So how about we try this... you tell me a reason for why you think Phipps should remain a person of interest after the big breakthrough dig that muppet author Mullins pushed for turned up nothing.... and I'll provide you with a corresponding justification for a closer look at Munro.
 

shellyg

Moderator
Dec 27, 2016
9,891
20,214
AFL Club
Western Bulldogs
So how about we try this... you tell me a reason for why you think Phipps should remain a person of interest after the big breakthrough dig that muppet author Mullins pushed for turned up nothing.... and I'll provide you with a corresponding justification for a closer look at Munro.
Someone else might like to do this with you, personally I don't have a firm opinion on who the cops should or shouldn't have as a POI.

The cops might have withheld a significant piece of information we know nothing about that automatically rules him out for the BC?
 

charlie20

Rookie
May 14, 2020
31
26
AFL Club
GWS
So how about we try this... you tell me a reason for why you think Phipps should remain a person of interest after the big breakthrough dig that muppet author Mullins pushed for turned up nothing.... and I'll provide you with a corresponding justification for a closer look at Munro.
the mullins faction are bunch of rogues indeed, yes, not only have they chalked up 2 failed digs, the second of which was hugely hyped and publicised, with a celebrity cast of supporters and "experts" including politicians and today tonight, but they carry on like fascists when it come to any degree of questions or testing of their thinking re phipps and this case, they have yet another book about to be published (hopefully pulped) for which theyve set up a fresh facebook page, most upsettingly theyve recently dragged joanne ratcliffe and kirste gordon into their black hole, by making noises along the lines that phipps was the adelaide oval abductor in 73, all this, only to drum up hype and sensationalism for a book, bloody disgusting imo

they are trying to insert phipps into adelaide oval in order to "strengthen" their unshakeable conviction that phipps took the beaumonts, because it's generally believed, and has been for decades, that it was the same man ...

no way phipps did adelaide oval, and thus no way he did the beaumont abduction either - imho
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

GreyCrow

TheBrownDog
Mar 21, 2016
51,809
77,385
Down South Corvus Tristis
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
Sturt, Redskins , White Sox
the mullins faction are bunch of rogues indeed, yes, not only have they chalked up 2 failed digs, the second of which was hugely hyped and publicised, with a celebrity cast of supporters and "experts" including politicians and today tonight, but they carry on like fascists when it come to any degree of questions or testing of their thinking re phipps and this case, they have yet another book about to be published (hopefully pulped) for which theyve set up a fresh facebook page, most upsettingly theyve recently dragged joanne ratcliffe and kirste gordon into their black hole, by making noises along the lines that phipps was the adelaide oval abductor in 73, all this, only to drum up hype and sensationalism for a book, bloody disgusting imo

they are trying to insert phipps into adelaide oval in order to "strengthen" their unshakeable conviction that phipps took the beaumonts, because it's generally believed, and has been for decades, that it was the same man ...

no way phipps did adelaide oval, and thus no way he did the beaumont abduction either - imho
So exactly like the McIntyres then
 

shellyg

Moderator
Dec 27, 2016
9,891
20,214
AFL Club
Western Bulldogs
the mullins faction are bunch of rogues indeed, yes, not only have they chalked up 2 failed digs, the second of which was hugely hyped and publicised, with a celebrity cast of supporters and "experts" including politicians and today tonight, but they carry on like fascists when it come to any degree of questions or testing of their thinking re phipps and this case, they have yet another book about to be published (hopefully pulped) for which theyve set up a fresh facebook page, most upsettingly theyve recently dragged joanne ratcliffe and kirste gordon into their black hole, by making noises along the lines that phipps was the adelaide oval abductor in 73, all this, only to drum up hype and sensationalism for a book, bloody disgusting imo
We're not part of some sort of ghastly turf war, are we?
 

charlie20

Rookie
May 14, 2020
31
26
AFL Club
GWS
shelly, i wouldnt put it quite like that, imo the stakes are far too high and sobering for people to get lost in ego and self interest, my attitude is that any efforts to solve these crimes should be results driven, and that's it, that said i do seriously question the motives of some people in this space, especially when they refuse to allow input from others, who may wish to test their work, as that is how we get closer to the truth, answers, finding these poor kids, and, with some luck, seeing guilty persons pay the price for what they did/knew about
 

Bograt

Rookie
May 12, 2020
39
20
AFL Club
Geelong
Taking pot shots unmoderated!
You're the moderator... free to moderate! I think Mullins is a muppet. He's continuing to publish and promote his books putting Phipps at the centre of the abduction when the expensive and widely promoted search for clues that he was so confident would prove him right fell very very flat. I think he's a muppet because, as he himself explains, he supposedly had opportunity to secure critical evidence (the purse from Phipps' possessions) and didn't act. It's now only his word that it was even there!
 
Last edited:

Top Bottom