Current Anthony Munro - Paedophile & POI in unsolved SA childrens disappearance

Bograt

Rookie
May 12, 2020
43
20
AFL Club
Geelong
And I thought it was going quite well ...

This thread dedicated to Munro only opened up recently, it might be a bit much to expect we should be all over the details. Do you have a link please and I'll put some work into catching up in here?
It's called "GOOGLE". Most people on here who have been left by yourself as moderator to freely take pot shots at my work while you play bias ump and dump and block the very material you ask for seem to be able to use it.... and seem only to use it!
 

Bograt

Rookie
May 12, 2020
43
20
AFL Club
Geelong
Thanks. I haven't noticed it, I'll have a look.
What I will say is that I had no contact with that partner until well after Munro was back in Adelaide... more than 18 months after... and then it was a single brief phone call so I could assure that grub knew he too was to be served justice for destroying young lives. Fyi, I also had no contact with AM until Dec 9, 2016.
My initial interest in Munro stemmed from the information provided to me by Max. David Smith also gave information which supported my interest in Munro for the Beaumont abduction.
Regardless of my thoughts on the possibility of Munro being involved in the Beaumont abduction, it was very clear to me from a raft of information from a number victims - SCIB Detectives commented it was some of the most compelling evidence provided for an historic abuse case - that Munro would be convicted of child sex abuse if he was to face court here.
It was also apparent he had great opportunity to hurt more children where he was in Cambodia, in the city where I have treasured family.
My motivation was to bring Munro to justice for his abhorrent crimes and, strongly supported by people you may not expect, I did all I could to help make that happen.
I must question the motives of those who continue to show support for Munro.... a convicted pedophile who preyed on children from the early '60s through to the '90s at the very least.... before taking his millions and fleeing to Cambodia where there was no extradition treaty and it is a well known pedophile haven. And setting up orphanages/school programs. Anyone who believes that was in good faith is in dreamland. The leaders of those programs admit they were hoodwinked by that creep.
 

shellyg

Moderator
Dec 27, 2016
9,895
20,215
AFL Club
Western Bulldogs
It's called "GOOGLE". Most people on here who have been left by yourself as moderator to freely take pot shots at my work while you play bias ump and dump and block the very material you ask for seem to be able to use it.... and seem only to use it!
Oh grow up. And play by the rules or didn't you do the basic homework on those? Howls of bias is a BS call, off you I'd suggest it's a manipulative attempt to shut down moderation and take the floor unchallenged.

I'm not here to protect journalists or over emotional jerks, when you put your name to an article someone might mention it.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

shellyg

Moderator
Dec 27, 2016
9,895
20,215
AFL Club
Western Bulldogs
I must question the motives of those who continue to show support for Munro.... a convicted pedophile who preyed on children from the early '60s through to the '90s at the very least.... before taking his millions and fleeing to Cambodia where there was no extradition treaty and it is a well known pedophile haven. And setting up orphanages/school programs. Anyone who believes that was in good faith is in dreamland. The leaders of those programs admit they were hoodwinked by that creep.
Does this thread look like it shows support to paedophiles? Wtf is wrong with you?
 

shellyg

Moderator
Dec 27, 2016
9,895
20,215
AFL Club
Western Bulldogs
BRYAN LITTLELY, The Advertiser
May 20, 2015 11:52pm

VIGILANTE paedophile hunters are tracking the movements of a former Adelaide businessman and convicted paedophile in South-East Asia in a bid to solve a child abduction case there.

The Mr X suspect, who cannot be named, is being pursued by a former Adelaide business associate who has teamed with a “bounty hunter” who claims to be an ex-American intelligence agent and senior police to track the man, described as “a flamboyant man about town’.



 

Bograt

Rookie
May 12, 2020
43
20
AFL Club
Geelong
BRYAN LITTLELY, The Advertiser
May 20, 2015 11:52pm

VIGILANTE paedophile hunters are tracking the movements of a former Adelaide businessman and convicted paedophile in South-East Asia in a bid to solve a child abduction case there.

The Mr X suspect, who cannot be named, is being pursued by a former Adelaide business associate who has teamed with a “bounty hunter” who claims to be an ex-American intelligence agent and senior police to track the man, described as “a flamboyant man about town’.



Yes. Partner. On all fronts
 

Bograt

Rookie
May 12, 2020
43
20
AFL Club
Geelong
Does this thread look like it shows support to paedophiles? Wtf is wrong with you?
Bit touchy now dear!!! This thread may nor but take a look across your others. It's quite obvious when you remove posts and block people providing comment that don't align with your views. Very lopsided sweetheart!
 

shellyg

Moderator
Dec 27, 2016
9,895
20,215
AFL Club
Western Bulldogs
Bit touchy now dear!!! This thread may nor but take a look across your others. It's quite obvious when you remove posts and block people providing comment that don't align with your views. Very lopsided sweetheart!
BS.

It's Sunday and most of us could be relaxing but here you are making false accusations.

Why don't you do your next hard hitting piece examining the ever evolving claims of the 'witnesses' around this thing, insertions into every high profile crime across South Australia and challenging the parents of child murder victims when there has been a conviction. It's entirely shameless.

Do something about it. Please, someone do something!
 

GreyCrow

TheBrownDog
Mar 21, 2016
51,808
77,380
Down South Corvus Tristis
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
Sturt, Redskins , White Sox
Bringing the thread back on track

Munro is a POS but he is not the Beaumont kidnapper. Never is and never was

The lead investigator on the Beaumont case, Detective Senior Sergeant David Sheridan of the South Australia Police’s major crime investigation branch, has previously said that three independent probes into the claims against Mr. Munro and Max McIntyre have shown that there is “absolutely no evidence that they’re involved.”
 

Bograt

Rookie
May 12, 2020
43
20
AFL Club
Geelong
Bringing the thread back on track

Munro is a POS but he is not the Beaumont kidnapper. Never is and never was

The lead investigator on the Beaumont case, Detective Senior Sergeant David Sheridan of the South Australia Police’s major crime investigation branch, has previously said that three independent probes into the claims against Mr. Munro and Max McIntyre have shown that there is “absolutely no evidence that they’re involved.”
You a cop then GreyCrow... (snip)
 

shellyg

Moderator
Dec 27, 2016
9,895
20,215
AFL Club
Western Bulldogs
Bringing the thread back on track

Munro is a POS but he is not the Beaumont kidnapper. Never is and never was

The lead investigator on the Beaumont case, Detective Senior Sergeant David Sheridan of the South Australia Police’s major crime investigation branch, has previously said that three independent probes into the claims against Mr. Munro and Max McIntyre have shown that there is “absolutely no evidence that they’re involved.”
There's another article out there that uses the word 'cleared' on Munro.

Head of the investigation, which I didn't want to post due to sensitivities around this thing, that asserts the McIntyre's claims on the Beaumont Children have no credibility and particularly given their claims about other various murders.
 

GreyCrow

TheBrownDog
Mar 21, 2016
51,808
77,380
Down South Corvus Tristis
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
Sturt, Redskins , White Sox
There's another article out there that uses the word 'cleared' on Munro.

Head of the investigation, which I didn't want to post due to sensitivities around this thing, that asserts the McIntyre's claims on the Beaumont Children have no credibility given their claims about other various murders.
There are/were competing claims about the Beaumont Children

The various suspects named ie Percy , Wilder etc

Then there is a smaller but louder subset of SA families all competing for the same attention


Mcintyre, Phipps , Hart/Marshall

To paraphrase Dire Straits - one of them says they are the murderer , 2 of them must be wrong
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

shellyg

Moderator
Dec 27, 2016
9,895
20,215
AFL Club
Western Bulldogs
There are/were competing claims about the Beaumont Children

The various suspects named ie Percy , Wilder etc

Then there is a smaller but louder subset of SA families all competing for the same attention


Mcintyre, Phipps , Hart/Marshall

To paraphrase Dire Straits - one of them says they are the murderer , 2 of them must be wrong
Given the history, it's hardly fair imo to harass or attack anybody that might question the veracity of the current set of claims being made in the public domain especially when some of them are so offensive to be nuts.
 

Bograt

Rookie
May 12, 2020
43
20
AFL Club
Geelong
You a cop then GreyCrow... (snip)
You a cop then GreyCrow... (snip)
The "no evidence" line is based on a single interview where Munro declined to speak.... that's straight from Sheridan's mouth. The no evidence claim came two weeks after the head of Major Crime claimed absolutely no knowledge of Munro. Of course that is unlikely given he was convicted in 1991 for pedophile crimes and surely, his victim being a Glenelg Scout, our on the ball police would've applied some consideration to the possibility he knew something about the abduction... given his locality and clear desire for children! After all, that's why Phipps is considered... even without a conviction for pedophilia
 

shellyg

Moderator
Dec 27, 2016
9,895
20,215
AFL Club
Western Bulldogs
The "no evidence" line is based on a single interview where Munro declined to speak.... that's straight from Sheridan's mouth. The no evidence claim came two weeks after the head of Major Crime claimed absolutely no knowledge of Munro. Of course that is unlikely given he was convicted in 1991 for pedophile crimes and surely, his victim being a Glenelg Scout, our on the ball police would've applied some consideration to the possibility he knew something about the abduction... given his locality and clear desire for children! After all, that's why Phipps is considered... even without a conviction for pedophilia
If you don't mind, how old was Munro's youngest victim at the time of the offending?
 

Bograt

Rookie
May 12, 2020
43
20
AFL Club
Geelong
DSS David Sheridan is - he says they are cleared

Do you dispute him?
I dispute the fact DSS Sheridan says Munro is "cleared" .... certainly not what DSS Sheridan has told me when meeting with him on this matter.
That's the problem when you rely on Google and listen to others with misguided agendas to inform your comments... you say things like people don't exist, they're made up to fit a story.... the kind of mistakes hobby sleuths make.
 

GreyCrow

TheBrownDog
Mar 21, 2016
51,808
77,380
Down South Corvus Tristis
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
Sturt, Redskins , White Sox
I dispute the fact DSS Sheridan says Munro is "cleared" .... certainly not what DSS Sheridan has told me when meeting with him on this matter.
That's the problem when you rely on Google and listen to others with misguided agendas to inform your comments... you say things like people don't exist, they're made up to fit a story.... the kind of mistakes hobby sleuths make.
The quoted piece doesnt say cleared. Says there is no evidence. 3 times

As to misguided agendas informing peoples comments . Pot.Kettle.Black
 

Bograt

Rookie
May 12, 2020
43
20
AFL Club
Geelong
So how about we try this... you tell me a reason for why you think Phipps should remain a person of interest after the big breakthrough dig that muppet author Mullins pushed for turned up nothing.... and I'll provide you with a corresponding justification for a closer look at Munro.
 

shellyg

Moderator
Dec 27, 2016
9,895
20,215
AFL Club
Western Bulldogs
So how about we try this... you tell me a reason for why you think Phipps should remain a person of interest after the big breakthrough dig that muppet author Mullins pushed for turned up nothing.... and I'll provide you with a corresponding justification for a closer look at Munro.
Someone else might like to do this with you, personally I don't have a firm opinion on who the cops should or shouldn't have as a POI.

The cops might have withheld a significant piece of information we know nothing about that automatically rules him out for the BC?
 

charlie20

Rookie
May 14, 2020
31
24
AFL Club
GWS
So how about we try this... you tell me a reason for why you think Phipps should remain a person of interest after the big breakthrough dig that muppet author Mullins pushed for turned up nothing.... and I'll provide you with a corresponding justification for a closer look at Munro.
the mullins faction are bunch of rogues indeed, yes, not only have they chalked up 2 failed digs, the second of which was hugely hyped and publicised, with a celebrity cast of supporters and "experts" including politicians and today tonight, but they carry on like fascists when it come to any degree of questions or testing of their thinking re phipps and this case, they have yet another book about to be published (hopefully pulped) for which theyve set up a fresh facebook page, most upsettingly theyve recently dragged joanne ratcliffe and kirste gordon into their black hole, by making noises along the lines that phipps was the adelaide oval abductor in 73, all this, only to drum up hype and sensationalism for a book, bloody disgusting imo

they are trying to insert phipps into adelaide oval in order to "strengthen" their unshakeable conviction that phipps took the beaumonts, because it's generally believed, and has been for decades, that it was the same man ...

no way phipps did adelaide oval, and thus no way he did the beaumont abduction either - imho
 

GreyCrow

TheBrownDog
Mar 21, 2016
51,808
77,380
Down South Corvus Tristis
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
Sturt, Redskins , White Sox
the mullins faction are bunch of rogues indeed, yes, not only have they chalked up 2 failed digs, the second of which was hugely hyped and publicised, with a celebrity cast of supporters and "experts" including politicians and today tonight, but they carry on like fascists when it come to any degree of questions or testing of their thinking re phipps and this case, they have yet another book about to be published (hopefully pulped) for which theyve set up a fresh facebook page, most upsettingly theyve recently dragged joanne ratcliffe and kirste gordon into their black hole, by making noises along the lines that phipps was the adelaide oval abductor in 73, all this, only to drum up hype and sensationalism for a book, bloody disgusting imo

they are trying to insert phipps into adelaide oval in order to "strengthen" their unshakeable conviction that phipps took the beaumonts, because it's generally believed, and has been for decades, that it was the same man ...

no way phipps did adelaide oval, and thus no way he did the beaumont abduction either - imho
So exactly like the McIntyres then
 

Top Bottom