- Sep 14, 2005
- 18,420
- 18,667
With Cloke’s announcement today, the AFL website put up highlights of his career, and gee was he a big focal point for Collingwood up forward in his prime.
It got me thinking, was Rocca more important up forward? Pebbles was known as the barometer in his prime and his influence decided whether Collingwood won or lost - he almost won us the 2002 GF and was suspended in 2003. Cloke was the most dominant contested mark in the competition for about 4-5 years and was a serious threat to defenders too.
Who’d you think played a more important role as a Collingwood forward?
It got me thinking, was Rocca more important up forward? Pebbles was known as the barometer in his prime and his influence decided whether Collingwood won or lost - he almost won us the 2002 GF and was suspended in 2003. Cloke was the most dominant contested mark in the competition for about 4-5 years and was a serious threat to defenders too.
Who’d you think played a more important role as a Collingwood forward?