Remove this Banner Ad

Anti-AFL thread - post here

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Re: afl rulz

Originally posted by Le Rouge
AFL more skill? :confused: BULL****!!! You gotta be joking right?

Because throwing a ball 5 yards sideways is infinitely more skilful than hitting a running team-mate on the chest with a 50m drop-punt while yourself running at full speed.
 
Re: afl rulz

Originally posted by hirdy_is_champ
more skill better crouds.
afl is the best
sorry league ppl im bored
with a user name like that to begin with, i'm not totally surprised. The 'yoof' of today is just living proof of the bright future our country can look forward to.

If you are any higher than primary school, be ashamed of yourself.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Re: Re: Re: afl rulz

Originally posted by dyertribe
Because throwing a ball 5 yards sideways is infinitely more skilful than hitting a running team-mate on the chest with a 50m drop-punt while yourself running at full speed.

Pure AFL intelligence this one.

That's like saying 'Because tapping the ball back to concede a behind is more skillfull that throwing a curving 30 metre-spiral pass that cuts out 4 guys and hits the team-mate on the chest.

You choose a mundane skill in one game, and compare it to a highlight skill in the other.

Considering the AFL has less than 20 players who can do this afore mentioned '50-metre kick to the chest' with regularity, don't go proclaiming it's the run of the mill action in the game.

If you were to compare Andrew Johns to Ashley McIntosh, RL would wins hands down.

Comments like that just add creedence to EA's claim about AFL fans being ignorant.
 
The tackling styles are different. In AFL, you cant tackle below the knees. In league, tackling is made easier because 2 lines of men are running into each other, whereas in AFL, its usually players chasing other players in all directions.

Although i admit there is more physicality in League, u cant just say, league tacklers are better. Its like saying table tennis players hit better than tennis players. You cant just compare it like that. Personally, tackles are not very common in AFL and so it creates more excitement when there is a tackle.

Think of it this way, get an afl team to play league and get a league team to play afl. Which do u think will be a better one to watch? AFL is definitely more skills based and you wont have many players in league who can kick straight, handball straight and mark AFL style.

In a league game, AFL players wouldnt be the best tacklers but they will be able to tackle a league player who is running into them, especially with a couple of team mates next to them in a line.

I have played both games (at club level) and found that AFL was a much harder game to play and needed more training to get the skills right.

Prove me wrong.
 
Originally posted by Sid
The tackling styles are different. In AFL, you cant tackle below the knees. In league, tackling is made easier because 2 lines of men are running into each other, whereas in AFL, its usually players chasing other players in all directions.

Although i admit there is more physicality in League, u cant just say, league tacklers are better. Its like saying table tennis players hit better than tennis players. You cant just compare it like that. Personally, tackles are not very common in AFL and so it creates more excitement when there is a tackle.

Think of it this way, get an afl team to play league and get a league team to play afl. Which do u think will be a better one to watch? AFL is definitely more skills based and you wont have many players in league who can kick straight, handball straight and mark AFL style.

In a league game, AFL players wouldnt be the best tacklers but they will be able to tackle a league player who is running into them, especially with a couple of team mates next to them in a line.

I have played both games (at club level) and found that AFL was a much harder game to play and needed more training to get the skills right.

Prove me wrong.

And you aren't paying the Technique required to tackle head on enough credit. Trust me, the AFL players wouldn't stand a chance. It would be offload city out there.
 
what happened to the last post??????

this will turn into another afl vs rl thread where all the same **** will be brought up.

lets get over it and talk football, its getting bloody boring!!!!!! we already have 2 ten+ page threads on this crap.
 
Originally posted by Hurbie
And you aren't paying the Technique required to tackle head on enough credit. Trust me, the AFL players wouldn't stand a chance. It would be offload city out there.

Yes, once again my post is more biased than ever. Do you think league players would stand a chance in afl? I do credit the head on tackles and do see that we would lack the skills to try to stop offloads. All i am saying is that we would perform better.
 
Originally posted by holc
what happened to the last post??????

this will turn into another afl vs rl thread where all the same **** will be brought up.

lets get over it and talk football, its getting bloody boring!!!!!! we already have 2 ten+ page threads on this crap.

Hahaha, so true... I havent been here often but i'd say that 80% of my posts are arguments between AFL and league, which i agree is pretty sad. But people like the leb inspire me to love afl more. I shall spend less time in this forum from now on.

Im waiting for a soccer fan to come in here and shut us all up.
 
Originally posted by Sid
But people like the leb inspire me to love afl more. I shall spend less time in this forum from now on.

Thanks for the compliment mate!:D RL don't need or want people like you to support our great game!!!!
Don't bother coming into the RL forum! All you do is talking bull**** anyway!! In the words of Chippy (RIP) you are a Jibbera (Spelling???)...
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Re: Re: Re: Re: afl rulz

Originally posted by Kurt Angle ©
Pure AFL intelligence this one.

As opposed to your opening drivel? What exactly is "pure AFL intelligence"?

If you're going to contest what I say then leave the hyperbole out and talk facts - if not then you're just as bad as everyone else who posts in these load of sh|t threads.

Originally posted by Kurt Angle ©
Comments like that just add creedence to EA's claim about AFL fans being ignorant.

As opposed to Le Rouge's post which I replied to? Six of one, half a dozen of the other - you can't have it both ways.

Oh, and I believe the word you were looking for is credence.
 
Re: Re: afl rulz

Originally posted by MightyFighting
"My only wish,
to catch a fish..."

lol rugby has more skill!! ur dreaming whats a bunch of big fat wackers throwing a ball to eachother and smashing the hell out of them when they get the ball.
and the reason u said ******ed when i said afl has more crowds is because im right
 
Re: Re: Re: afl rulz

Originally posted by hirdy_is_champ
lol rugby has more skill!! ur dreaming whats a bunch of big fat wackers throwing a ball to eachother and smashing the hell out of them when they get the ball.
and the reason u said ******ed when i said afl has more crowds is because im right

Seriously grow up mate! Good on you, you got what you wanted an argument now **** off to where you came from!!!
 
Originally posted by Sid
Yes, once again my post is more biased than ever. Do you think league players would stand a chance in afl? I do credit the head on tackles and do see that we would lack the skills to try to stop offloads. All i am saying is that we would perform better.

Did I ever say they would? You seem to think that having someone run at you head on with a full head of steam is childs play. Trust me, It is not.
 
Re: Re: Re: afl rulz

Originally posted by hirdy_is_champ
lol rugby has more skill!! ur dreaming whats a bunch of big fat wackers throwing a ball to eachother and smashing the hell out of them when they get the ball.
and the reason u said ******ed when i said afl has more crowds is because im right

:rolleyes: . What swamp did you spawn out of?
 
hey sid if the league guys played a game of a.f.l against any of the teams in the a.f.l they would get hammered on the score board.if the a.f.l played against any of the league teams from australia or england,THEY WOULDN'T COME BACK OUT AFTER THE HALF TIME BREAK.

go on say it,a.f.l would cream the league guys:rolleyes:
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Originally posted by ParraEelsNRL
hey sid if the league guys played a game of a.f.l against any of the teams in the a.f.l they would get hammered on the score board.if the a.f.l played against any of the league teams from australia or england,THEY WOULDN'T COME BACK OUT AFTER THE HALF TIME BREAK.

go on say it,a.f.l would cream the league guys:rolleyes:
likewise if the Australian lawn bowls team took on the Australian weightlifting team, i'd hazard a guess that each would win their respective sports.... not exactly rocket science.
 
It'd be More interesting if the Australian Weightlifting Team took on the Australian lawn Bowls Team in a Game of League :D
 
bring it on league!! it shows that league is also crap coz u have to get a team from another country to play in an aussie based rugby league comp. thats just stupid if u ask me. but its probably coz qld, act and nsw r the only rugby states (and afl is becoming very popular in qld with the sucsess of brissy).

afl is played in vic, sa, wa, tas, and nt. thats y we have such good supporter bases. im sure none of the league clubs could get 40,000 members.
 
Originally posted by hirdy_is_champ
bring it on league!! it shows that league is also crap coz u have to get a team from another country to play in an aussie based rugby league comp. thats just stupid if u ask me. but its probably coz qld, act and nsw r the only rugby states (and afl is becoming very popular in qld with the sucsess of brissy).

afl is played in vic, sa, wa, tas, and nt. thats y we have such good supporter bases. im sure none of the league clubs could get 40,000 members.
big f**king deal if you can claim twice as many States for AFL, thats just a meaningless simpleton argument.

4 AFL States = 48% of the population.
2 NRL States = 52% of the population.

Big f***ing deal if you have twice as many States.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top