Any chance in the GF sprint?

[wallyt99]

It's the only thing in Brown and Gold we can cheer for tomorrow sadly.

Billy Hartung.

Any chance?

I'm gonna say 4-5th place....

 

[Hawkthorn33]

If he wins I'm claiming it as a 4peat

 

[Hodginator]

This thread has just made it hit home that we aren't in the GF

 

[rdhopkins2]

Clutching at straws now! Haha!
Better claim the BHH Devt Squad GF as a 4 peat

 

[bunky]

I thought Birch was representing the hawks in this year's GF sprint?
That being the case we don't have a chance in hell of beating Majak.

 

[Darth Docomo]

Even if they handicapped the race and gave Billy a 10m headstart, Majak would still mow him down.

The only way Billy would win is if they made it a best of 7, back to back. His endurance would see him win races 4-7.

 

[HairyO]

Even if they handicapped the race and gave Billy a 10m headstart, Majak would still mow him down.

The only way Billy would win is if they made it a best of 7, back to back. His endurance would see him win races 4-7.

100m beep test. Billy would nail that.

 

[Flamin Joe]

Might be the first time this year we'll see him run in straight line.

 

[JordyLuke]

Too small for the explosive power needed for that distance I reckon. Now if it was over 1500m...

 

[Cleavy]

I thought Birch was representing the hawks in this year's GF sprint?

Birch is currently involved in the "Longest Kick" contest.

 

[Boot Studder]

Birch is currently involved in the "Longest Kick" contest.

He's kicking like a backman, too! The return of the mongrel punt.

 

[Boot Studder]

Bring back Geoff Ablett!

 

[Collins-Langford-Ayres]

Why didn't he run ?

 

[Bumpswithagrin]

Why didn't he run ?

Who, Hartung? He did. He ran in the first heat, mustn't have had a good enough time to get through to the final (think he came fourth or fifth in his hea

 

[Noneedforaname]

Why was he in the race though? Surely not our fastest. Over a distance, or doing circlework, sure, but in a straight line over 100 metres?

 

[Hawk Dork]

Who, Hartung? He did. He ran in the first heat, mustn't have had a good enough time to get through to the final (think he came fourth or fifth in his hea

They did say he qualified in his heat, then he wasnt there at the end ????

 

[Bumpswithagrin]

They did say he qualified in his heat, then he wasnt there at the end ????

Ok. I only saw the heat so not sure.

 

[HODGEYROAD]

I only saw the final, which just had no Billy Hartung haha.

 

[Bumps"N"Grins]

I'm sure I seen him run about 35m in the first heat, then started to pull up with the giggles.
Surely guys the GF sprint isn't all that serious, especially when you consider they are running against a token cabbie and a ring in suburban hack footballer.
Just airtime for 1300cabs these days.

Also seen what you did there Hodgey.

 

[StillAtLarge]

I only saw the final, which just had no Billy Hartung haha.

Wouldn't be the first time he's disappeared in a final...

 

[MrPremiership]

Would have won if he was running away from a tackling opportunity!!





(Thats for the Billy haters)

 

[grumbleguts]

I'm sure I seen him run about 35m in the first heat, then started to pull up with the giggles.
Surely guys the GF sprint isn't all that serious, especially when you consider they are running against a token cabbie and a ring in suburban hack footballer.
Just airtime for 1300cabs these days.

Also seen what you did there Hodgey.

I'm sorry but this band-aid needs to be pulled off. "Seen" on its own is NOT a word as such, it is a participle. For it to have any meaning it needs an auxiliary verb accompanying it. The past tense of "see" is "saw". "Seen" means nothing without the auxiliary verb "to have" as in "I have seen" or "I had seen". "I'm sure I saw him run" makes sense, and makes sense in your context. "I'm sure I have seen him run" makes sense grammatically but not in your context.

"I'm sure I seen him run" makes no sense at all.

 

[Gralin]

I'm sorry but this band-aid needs to be pulled off. "Seen" on its own is NOT a word as such, it is a participle. For it to have any meaning it needs an auxiliary verb accompanying it. The past tense of "see" is "saw". "Seen" means nothing without the auxiliary verb "to have" as in "I have seen" or "I had seen". "I'm sure I saw him run" makes sense, and makes sense in your context. "I'm sure I have seen him run" makes sense grammatically but not in your context.

"I'm sure I seen him run" makes no sense at all.

I seen what you did their

 

[grumbleguts]

I seen what you did their

Oh, your good.

 

[Mr Lizard]

Oh, your good.

nice but you should of left out the punctuation