Any father-son/father-daughter picks coming up in the near future?

flamingEMBERS

Norm Smith Medallist
Sep 8, 2011
9,925
8,815
AFL Club
West Coast
They should abolish the rule and make it a free draft. But that Probably won’t happen until we get an absolute superstar, highly touted number 1 pick and finish at the pointy end of the year that it will be gone and we won’t even get said player.
 

kane249

Death by Snu Snu
Oct 27, 2006
44,789
48,759
Behind enemy Lines
AFL Club
West Coast
Other Teams
Sth Freo, Liverpool, Chicago Bulls
But the child and player would have no biological connection.
It's a different set of parameters though if it's a same sex relationship for obvious reasons.

Denying them the right to be a mother - son/daughter pick could almost be seen as discrimination.

So only real qualifier you can put in is that the couple were together before the partner had a child.

Similar to the mens where a footballer couldn't marry a lady who already had a child, and then claim that kid as father son/daughter if they had no biological connection to them.

Essendon tried something similar to this a few years back when they used to allow club administrators as part of parent/son, and one of their admin tried to adopt Richard Cole. In fairness to her she had played some part raising him I think, but the league still knocked it back. Cole eventually ended up at Essendon anyway, but he was a spud so it was all moot.
 

MrWoollie

All Australian
Jul 28, 2008
624
1,020
England
AFL Club
West Coast
Other Teams
Lincoln City Imps, West Perth
Not going to get many if playing 50 games is the qualification mark for the ladies.
Don't want to make it too low a number such that every (wo)man and dog qualify.

I think 50 would be about right. If the competition expands and the number of games per season increases then 50 may not be enough. Approximately 5 x number of games in a season pretty close to what should be aimed at.

There wouldn't be many qualified at the moment, but the comp is only just getting going, and within a couple of years 50 games will be quite common.
 

Monocle

Norm Smith Medallist
Sep 18, 2003
8,160
19,000
Western Suburbs : Perth
AFL Club
West Coast
Other Teams
Claremont NE Patriots Eagles AFLW
Don't want to make it too low a number such that every (wo)man and dog qualify.

I think 50 would be about right. If the competition expands and the number of games per season increases then 50 may not be enough. Approximately 5 x number of games in a season pretty close to what should be aimed at.

There wouldn't be many qualified at the moment, but the comp is only just getting going, and within a couple of years 50 games will be quite common.
So under what you are proposing then, Daisy Pearce, Erin Phillips and Chelsea Randall kids wont be eligible, I think that is flawed.

I have no problem reviewing it when they play more games.

All players get injured but say a hammy injury is 5-6 weeks, for the guys thats a quarter of their season, the gals ping a hammy after week 3 then thats a season ending injury, that seems disproportionately harsh.

50 seems to high IMO.

Agree to disagree.
 

Remove this Banner Ad