Remove this Banner Ad

AO tv coverage

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Anyone know why they are advertising both Clijsters and Nadal for tomorrow night's session? According to the AO website, both play at the same time on different courts. Surely 7 won't show one match live and the other delayed? Surely?
I'm sure they won't tell us it's delayed*


*further delayed for West Australians
 
Channel 7 really know how to fudge up there coverage of sport!! I don't understand why they are not utilising the second digital channel to show more tennis. Most annoying is the matches on in the afternoon that are still going, and then they have to cut away to the news - like Hewitt's last night.

Wish Fox Sports showed matches as they did last year, was good to see some doubles matches. And don't have to deal with Cougar Town and MKR f'in adverts.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Umm, where the **** is the Roddick/Lopez match.

No women's match apart from a good matchup like Dementieva/Henin should take precedent over a good mens match.

Looks like Lopez will take the first set too, could be in for a long one, will have to find a stream now.:mad:
 
I got a theory.

Since Seven like to show whole matches of any match they start, they prefer to play womens tennis matches as they are generally shorter when possible.

I agree, they should show Roddick. They said at the start of the day, it was one of their features matches, they should try and stick to what they said. Plus it is time we have a mens match, and Roddick is always good fun.
 
I got a theory.

Since Seven like to show whole matches of any match they start, they prefer to play womens tennis matches as they are generally shorter when possible.

That was my thought too.
 
Henin/Kleybanova over Roddick/Lopez? What a joke..

Which game are your average housewives more interested in? And what demographic are all the new shows they are advertising aimed at?

It is blatantly clear that Seven aim the schedule for the housewives during the day.:rolleyes:
 
Had to laugh at the cluelessness of Nicole Bradtke (and Todd Woodbridge for that matter) a few minutes ago.

She admits on air (as part of a conversation in which Woodbridge is raving about her being the coach of Australia's Fed Cup team) that she has absolutely no idea who "the lady" sitting in the German player's box is.

Um Nicole: even a tennis ignoramus like me knows it's Andrea Petkovic - one of Germany's best young players who rose several hundred places in the world rankings last year. Even for those who were under a rock and didn't hear of her at all last year, someone who is supposedly an expert on women's tennis should have recognised her quite easily given she reached the semi finals of the televised tournament in Brisbane a week or two ago, losing to Clijsters after quite a tough struggle.

I wonder if Australia's Fed Cup coach has actually watched much women's tennis lately. :confused:
 
Tip to 7: If you're going to show replays don't always only show the last set if you want to keep suspense for people who dn't know the results. Otherwise we know who is going to win if they are 2 sets to 1 up...
 
Ch7 said on the news that tomorrow nights coverage of the Hewitt match starts at 6:30pm. So an hour of bullcrap about nothing in particular until the match starts around 7:30pm?

Probably look back at their last monster encounter.... completely neglecting their recent match in Sydney (i know 5 sets is a different story). It's funny hyping it up last night Griggs over stated the amount of times they have played at grand slam level..... epic fail right there.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

I actually dont mind the Kia Hotshots but once I see it more than twice in a day it pisses me off.
 
I actually dont mind the Kia Hotshots but once I see it more than twice in a day it pisses me off.
Exactly. They're great to watch but it's just that they keep repeating them during the day over and over when they could be showing actual tennis.

After a match finishes it's *Ads* *Griggs talking crap* *Kia hotshots* *Ads* *Griggs talking crap* *slow motion montage* *Ads*

Takes up about half an hour. Tennis anyone?
 
When I turn over to Sports Tonight to see all the scores, it reminds you how little actual tennis matches you see on 7. The fact Foxtel can't broadcast other matches is pathetic (and I don't even have Fox!)
 
Exactly. They're great to watch but it's just that they keep repeating them during the day over and over when they could be showing actual tennis.

After a match finishes it's *Ads* *Griggs talking crap* *Kia hotshots* *Ads* *Griggs talking crap* *slow motion montage* *Ads*

Takes up about half an hour. Tennis anyone?

You forgot *Griggs generating that horrid smile/giggle* and *ridiculous montage of the same pictures over and over again of some player who's playing in some match tonight or tomorrow*.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Sandy having another of his major jizzfests over an Australian player - this time Sam Stosur - atm.

(His pumping up of Australian players' tyres generally only seems to be outshone by his reaction when any AFL player shows up at the tennis).
 
One week in and I'd say this is the worst coverage ever :thumbsdown:
We've had:

Federer - 3
Nadal - 3
Djokovic - 0
Del Potro - 2
Davydenko - 0
Roddick - 1
Soderling - 0
Verdasco - 1
Tsonga - 2
Gonzalez - 0
Monfils - 0
Stepanek - 0
Cilic - 1
Simon - DNP
Robredo - 0
Haas - 0
Ferrer - 1
Wawrinka - 0
Youzhny - 0

8/20 is PATHETIC! :mad::mad::mad:
And for the majority of the 8 that were shown, they either didn't show the full match or it was on delay!! Piss weak.
 
When you think about it though, 7 give us far more coverage than any other FTA network would. There's no way Ch9 or 10 would give up their shows to show us over 12 hours a day of tennis.

Um no Channel 10 would be a much better broadcaster.

Channel 7 is the root of all evil. The way they screwed everyone over by not selling Foxtel the outside courts rights is a joke. I hate them. I actually kind of wish free to air didnt exist.

Channel 7 are also the worst AFL broadcasters.

Not to mention the commentary is crap.
 
Um no Channel 10 would be a much better broadcaster.

Channel 7 is the root of all evil. The way they screwed everyone over by not selling Foxtel the outside courts rights is a joke. I hate them. I actually kind of wish free to air didnt exist.

Channel 7 are also the worst AFL broadcasters.

Not to mention the commentary is crap.

Hmm, interesting concept, pay TV for all, and you just pay for the channels you actually want.

I'll take that.:thumbsu:
 
Well if free-to-air didnt exist then at least we would be more likely to get good coverage of sports events. I laugh at the fact that Channel 7 paid $750 million for AFL rights and they dont show any games live!!

For the Aus open they have bought the rights to every single match and they show about 3% of the matches. We miss so many of the good mens matches.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top