- Joined
- Jun 27, 2005
- Posts
- 3,877
- Reaction score
- 2,678
- Location
- Brisbane
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions

- Other Teams
- mavs, swan districts
i always thought that someone who 100% backs a person or entity no matter what the context of the criticism was an 'apologist'
but lately it seems the term is being used to describe anyone who defends the club or players against unfounded criticisms
i guess we all like to consider ourselves as 'somewhere in the middle' of the bell curve but it got me to wondering exactly what the opposite of an apologist was?
would the term 'hater' be a reasonable polar opposite? (i.e. a hater = someone who sledges the club and players no matter the context or criticism)
your thoughts?
but lately it seems the term is being used to describe anyone who defends the club or players against unfounded criticisms
i guess we all like to consider ourselves as 'somewhere in the middle' of the bell curve but it got me to wondering exactly what the opposite of an apologist was?
would the term 'hater' be a reasonable polar opposite? (i.e. a hater = someone who sledges the club and players no matter the context or criticism)
your thoughts?







