It seems that the general consensus among the media and people on bigfooty that we have a terrible spine and very little depth in our key posts. IMO this is not as big an issue as people have made out and list wise we have good age profiles.
Firstly let me state for the record that 4-5 key positions in your 22 is the right number given the modern demands of footy being very much a running game.
Our stocks:
Back
Currently: Goldsack (30) & Dunn (30)
Depth: Reid (28) & Keeffe (27)
Developing: McLarty (19) & Schade (23)
Ruck
Currently: Grundy (23)
Depth: Cox (26)
Developing: McCarthy (19) & Lynch (18)
Forward
Currently: Moore (21) & Reid (28)
Depth: White (29), Cox (26) & Keeffe (27)
Developing: McCarthy (19) & Lynch (18)
All in all, I am reasonably happy with this list. Most positions are reasonably, well covered and those currently in the best 22 are playing well.
I think you're being a wee bit generous.
Firstly i understand why you doubled up some players since they can play multiple positions, but in a list like this it makes it look like you have more options than you really do with the double ups.
Goldsack & Dunn are 30 and will need to be replaced soon.
Reid unfortunately is very injury prone.
White, Cox & Keeffe are listed as depth but really...not much quality there.
McLarty, Schade, Lynch & McCarthy are very much unknowns in terms of whether they'll make the grade.
Moore is young and promising, although hasn't had a big output this year.
Grundy is good.
Then got to also count the fact that KPP's that are drafted often take a couple of years before making meaningful contributions.