- Joined
- Nov 26, 2007
- Posts
- 2,810
- Reaction score
- 8,538
- Location
- Queensland
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Hull City
Then i dont understand the premise of the thread. Your title clearly states the question "ARE WE REALLY IMPROVING?"
I just answered that. In future if youre going to ask a question then you need to accept an answer, or, from the outset, announce that youve already made up your mind.
People have given very well thought out and detailed reasons why yes we have improved, and how in regard to the off field it has come at a pretty decent 'rate'. Now with 2 finals appearances we are starting to see the fruits on field. But you can't take any of these answers on board, and instead continue to argue that we havent improved at a rate that is satisfactory to you and seemingly, only you.
Now, what excuses are you referring to?
And you're demonstrating that you won't accept any answer but your own.
You have Hawks as an example. We've already accomplished what they plan to do.
You brought up Port. We're equal if not ahead of them, both off field and if we had have won a final, on field as well, and came from further back to do it.
I think you mentioned North as well. We are streets ahead of them.
Other than failing to win a final, what exactly leads you to believe that we have not improved at a decent rate? If we take it as being the DH era, how is 5 years not a decent rate, considering how far back we came from???
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The bolded parts of these two posts are the reason I truly get frustrated by this stuff.
It's not even so much the opinion itself, as I've said numerous times, being critical of the club is a good thing. But it's the attitude behind certain people's criticism that I will no longer tolerate reading on here and continue to call them out on.
Even though I end up debating with them anyway, honestly it's pointless, and makes me feel like I'm debating a Christian about their beliefs or something. Because no matter what evidence you provide to the contrary of the opinion you're debating here, they are only interested in THEIR agenda, which is to RIP INTO THE CLUB NO MATTER WHAT IS HAPPENING!
To be honest Hawthorn were well ahead of us in 2004. We had nothing for the future and they had Hodge from 2001. I would argue their rebuild started in 2001 or earlier well before 2004 anyway!
Probably a fair call there, that actually backs up my point even further. If you said they were rebuilding from 2001, then it took them 5 years to make the finals, and 7 years to sneak a flag. And they didn't become dominant until about 2012, which is 11 years.
So for us, if we won a premiership in 2017, we'd be ahead of the game like Hawthorn were. But really, we're aiming for a dominant period between 2018-2021 in reality, or thereabouts.
Either way, it's puts all this talk about "have we really improved?" into perspective, and hopefully tempers expectations.










