Aaaarrrggghhhno no no and noOur two second rounders for Daniel Rich
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Aaaarrrggghhhno no no and noOur two second rounders for Daniel Rich
This has been standard Eagles for 2 years. Improvement from younger players and having a fit ruck division is where we will see development.only concern I have is if the older squad members flatline during games
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
??Not a good start for Ah Chee, bit of a slap in the face.
History of injuries and underachieving in 7 seasons at port, comes over and requests a one year contract to prove himself...
Not looking good for his big pay day next contract!!History of injuries and underachieving in 7 seasons at port, comes over and requests a one year contract to prove himself...
He then gets injured in our first practice match and immediately won't be available until round 5 at the earliest (going by today's medical report)
Ergo, not a good start.
Aah okHistory of injuries and underachieving in 7 seasons at port, comes over and requests a one year contract to prove himself...
He then gets injured in our first practice match and immediately won't be available until round 5 at the earliest (going by today's medical report)
Ergo, not a good start.
There's some sense in this. Mitchell was still a good player but really played a different role than he did at Hawthorn and was only here for a year anyway. He was not a ball winner here but mainly a receiver and distributer. Priddis was way past it and I really doubt we will miss him much. The problem to me is the lack of gain time for the kids. Apart from Barass, Nelson, Sheed and Duggan we have limited experience in the young players and of those, only Sheed is a genuine mid. Even Sheed's experience as a mid was limited as he was often played out of position. So while Priddis and Mitchell may not have been of great value last year, there has been nobody groomed to replace them. The kids played so far this year look a fair way off AFL level even if some good signs were there. I was hoping Ah Chee might step straight in but that is looking a bit grim at least for the first part of the season. So it looks like we have to rely on Redden, Hutchings, Sheed, Gaff and Shuey with help from Duggan and Yeo. Hopefully the match committee will have the guts to give the likes of Partington, Venables, Ainsworth and maybe Murtimer and Nelson a chance rather than use them as half forwards but some of these will take some time. On the plus side, we should at least have some players who can run in there.Here is another perspective.
Mitchell was brilliant but had aged and mentally retired during the season.
Prides was a brilliant extractor but age had caught up.
possibly Petrie will be the biggest short term loss.
Nic Nat was our most important midfielder - The day he kicked the sealer against GWS at Spotless he has got us back into the game through his inside work in packs. He is beast among beasts with huge power and brilliant hands. His leap is a bonus and while his rucking helped it was his inside power that won the contests. He is back.
Kids will improve but may not be brownlow winners - we need to be realistic. If the old guys didn't retire they would have just struggled through another season - so we are better off long term without them. Stop kidding yourself that we lost two mids in Brownlow form at their peak. Life has moved on for them.
If the boys commit we will be fine.
We went on a winning streak with Priddis out last year, So No we won't miss them.
The media doesn't seem to acknowledge what a defensive liability Priddis and Mitchell were last year. This whole notion that we're going to be strife without them is just nonsense.
History of injuries and underachieving in 7 seasons at port, comes over and requests a one year contract to prove himself...
He then gets injured in our first practice match and immediately won't be available until round 5 at the earliest (going by today's medical report)
Ergo, not a good start.
No doubt about it.It seems a lot of people have fallen off the Sheed bandwagon. I'm still on it. I feel he has another level to go. We saw a fit and firing Sheed get some decent midfield minutes and have career high numbers. If anything; he frankly should improve on those numbers with more time in the guts. There's a lot of expectations on his shoulders; and rightfully so. Several years ago he was viewed as the next big A-grade midfielder for the Eagles. Nothing's changed my mind that he can't achieve that. He's sat under Priddis, and under Mitchell for a year. Those two are consummate professionals, and Sheed would understand what it takes to succeed and get the most out of yourself. Possesses a strong body, hopefully this was a big pre-season and he can be an extractor in close for us.
I'm not sure having players a bit quicker to run defensively will compensate for an inability to win clearances.The media doesn't seem to acknowledge what a defensive liability Priddis and Mitchell were last year. This whole notion that we're going to be strife without them is just nonsense.
We were 17th in clearance differencial last year so I'm not sure having Priddis and Mitchell in the side really helped as much in that regard as people like to think.I'm not sure having players a bit quicker to run defensively will compensate for an inability to win clearances.
Footywire has us at 16th but your point still stands. I also noticed Gaff had highest number of clangers and Shuey had highest average of clangers per game which is a bit concerning when they are the experienced players we are relying on to hold the line.We were 17th in clearance differencial last year so I'm not sure having Priddis and Mitchell in the side really helped as much in that regard as people like to think.
I think it demonstrates how much of an impact Priddis had given how poorly we did during his demiseWe were 17th in clearance differencial last year so I'm not sure having Priddis and Mitchell in the side really helped as much in that regard as people like to think.
On the other side we wont have 4 vs 3 on fast breaksI think it demonstrates how much of an impact Priddis had given how poorly we did during his demise
Mitchell didn’t play a contested role anyway so he shouldn’t really be in the discussion, though I do think he contributed a fair amount in the games Priddis wasn’t playing.
Simple fact is we have struggled to adapt in matches where there is a step up in intensity at the contest. That was happening with Priddis in the side as well, but I think we will struggle even more now without him.
Our mids will be fine against some sides that don’t rely on stoppages as much, but I feel it will become even easier for other teams to blow us out of the water in periods of matches by applying intense pressure and numbers at stoppages.
