It did miss, Cannot believe the ump thought it was a goal.I mean yes the umpire said it was a goal but Lynch didn’t seem at all convinced. To me he looked like he thought he missed
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
It did miss, Cannot believe the ump thought it was a goal.I mean yes the umpire said it was a goal but Lynch didn’t seem at all convinced. To me he looked like he thought he missed
On a guess?Lynch missed. Umpire call was tentative and wrong. The review got the right result even if the umpire got it wrong initially.
I have enormous respect for Richmond, enormous respect.
I have enormous respect for Richmond, enormous respect.
I have enormous respect for Richmond, enormous respect.
I have enormous respect for Richmond, enormous respect.
I have enormous respect for Richmond, enormous respect.
I really hope soHardwick might unleash during his presser.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Reckon filth will lose to cats but they will probably make it to GF
Maybe two wrongs DO make a right.
The imposters are GONE, so I’m very comfortable with the review system.

Enough of the spamming ffs.
And the one from our game against the Crows who said Newman touched the ball.Must’ve been the same goal review adjudicator who said Newnes missed against Richmond
They don’t draw pictures, mate. The review ruled it was a point. They got it right. Imposters gone. Everyone happy.On a guess?
The goal umpire may well have gotten the decision wrong.They don’t draw pictures, mate. The review ruled it was a point. They got it right. Imposters gone. Everyone happy.

They wish they were usPopped in to the Richmond Board for a squiz..
s**t canning players..
Sacking the Coach..
AFL Corruption..
Umpire cheating..
I had to look twice, thought I was on the Carlton Board..![]()
Maybe two wrongs DO make a right.
The imposters are GONE, so I’m very comfortable with the review system.
Goal umpire doesn't need definitive evidence. He makes his call and we are to trust the call, like any other decision over the 120 minutes!
Two mistakes. Should never have been called a goal. Should never have been overturned.
Reckon filth will lose to cats but they will probably make it to GF

Popped in to the Richmond Board for a squiz..
s**t canning players..
Sacking the Coach..
AFL Corruption..
Umpire cheating..
I had to look twice, thought I was on the Carlton Board..![]()
How many weeks off do I get if I post
“I have enormous respect for Richmond, enormous respect”
On there board.
![]()

Maybe you and I couldn’t see it, maybe the commentators couldn’t, or the crowd, but have you considered that the bloke in the ARC may have seen it definitively go over the post?The goal umpire may well have gotten the decision wrong.
But he didn't break the rules of the game, which is what the ARC did. That is not 'getting it right'.
Correct and Richmond can suffer for it but that’s gotta be the second worst review of the year.This game, this competition drives me insane, you have a goal called by the goal umpire and it’s reviewed, the rules are clear, you meed definitive evidence to overturn a decision, the score reviewers comments were a lie, it’s clear on the vision the ball crosses over the top of the post. What a crock, they don’t have a camera up there, there’s no way you could tell definitively anything from the vision.
Imagine if we were playing that game, it’s absolute crap.
How many weeks off do I get if I post
“I have enormous respect for Richmond, enormous respect”
On there board.
![]()