As of right now which player can your team least afford to lose?

[PhatBoy]

No one - they can all be marched out!!

What was really worrying yesterday if I was a saints fan was that for about 50 minutes of game time, you had literally only one shot at goal that didn’t come from a free kick. Considering how threadbare our defence was, and how you actually won the clearances, that is a frighteningly poor outcome.

 

[PhatBoy]

James Sicily

The hawk that opposition teams can least afford for you to be without

 

[Chism]

Docherty / Matty Kruezer / Marc Murphy / Marchbank for such a young team in the middle of a full on rebuild with over 42 list changes in 3 years.






Oh hang on.

 

[Isaac Cumming No 1]

I'm actually not sure. Toby is important. Probably Shiel with our current situation for the next few weeks. Whitfield would hurt too. We can't keep giving up speed without it really starting to hurt.

 

[MrDanggazz]

Tom Hawkins.

Surely Menzel over him

 

[MrDanggazz]

Probably Sandilands, Fyfe or Alex Pearce all been great for us so far this year

 

[hawkman]

McEvoy

 

[Golumless]

Matt Crouch

 

[Stan_Darsh72]

Blake Acres or Luke Dunstan

 

[Lunchlady Doris]

Tom Stewart holding our defence together at the moment.

 

[RunByThePool]

Grundy

 

[Cevap_Roll]

Conca

 

[The Daicos]

Naitanui - makes Eagles at least 4 goal better per game

Agree. Can't believe the footy media thought the Eagles were going to go backwards this year with him returning to the team.

 

[telsor]

Naitanui - makes Eagles at least 4 goal better per game

In the finals, when they took guys off at the end to rest/not risk them, it was Rance, dusty, cotch & nank on the pine...

I'd have thought Jack would be right up there, but it seems the coaches didn't agree. (Personally, I think we were far enough ahead we could have had 5 on the bench...)

On [device_name] using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[sante]

Nankervis. Our only other options are Soldo, Hampson and Chol

 

[twiggy4PM]

At the moment Gibbs. Everyone else is already out or playing injured.

 

[Toump Ass]

LOL @ Geelong supporters listing everyone except Dangerfield

 

[kaiserchief13]

In the finals, when they took guys off at the end to rest/not risk them, it was Rance, dusty, cotch & nank on the pine...

I'd have thought Jack would be right up there, but it seems the coaches didn't agree. (Personally, I think we were far enough ahead we could have had 5 on the bench...)

On [device_name] using BigFooty.com mobile app

Why did you quote my post?

 

[Old Stuckup]

Probably Daniher but you could make a case for Hooker, Hurley or Merrett.

 

[Hawk Dork]

If Sinclair goes down we have no replacements for him

Buddy is way more important

 

[STPer18]

LOL @ Geelong supporters listing everyone except Dangerfield

We beat your mob without him. A midfield of Selwood, Selwood, Duncan, Ablett, Kelly, Parfitt, Menegola etc can compete with most teams, players like Hawkins and Taylor aren't as easily replaceable.

 

[RUNVS]

Buddy is way more important

To be honest I disagree as while Buddy is important our forward line can function without him, even if it is no where near as scary. Without Sinclair we have no ruck division at all.

 

[Toump Ass]

We beat your mob without him.

Thanks to an errant kick from Gawnie.

But in any case we just got hammered by Hawthorn, in the wet, by over 10 goals. Our two victories were against North and Brisbane. Beating us means nothing.

You're not making finals without Dangerfield.

 

[Benny78]

Daniel Menzel

 

[HairyO]

LOL @ Geelong supporters listing everyone except Dangerfield

So much depth.