The fact that AFL made poor decisions. Does not thus mean that the result of those decisions (ie EFC 2013 penalties) means essendon are innocent as charged".The fact that AFL made poor decisions. Does not thus mean that the result of those decisions (ie EFC 2013 penalties) means essendon are "Guilty as charged". It purely means that the AFL used the media and punishments to make the average footy fan believe essendon are guilty without looking at all the facts.
We are into the third year of the AFL Drugs Saga if it was a clear cut case the players would have accepted penalty offers and would have served them by now.
I hope more of the average fans look at this investigation what it was. A clear example of the AFL doing everything they can to protect their brand and they do not care who they hurt as long as they protect their brand, their pay packets. The AFL takes you the average fan as a fool, do you want to continue being one.
just think it may be your club next time.
They either didn't or there were no penalty offers.
Yes the AFL tried to protect their brand but that doesn't mean that efc are innocent.
That depends on whether my club trips to dope its players and cover it up.
Last edited: