Athletics faces new doping crisis after ‘biggest leak’ of test results

Spongebob

Premiership Player
Sep 18, 2007
4,235
7,621
On a 3-hour tour
AFL Club
West Coast
Other Teams
West Perth, Fighting Illini
Good story from French TV on 4 Corners tonight. I love how Putin's Russia is just like Stalin's Soviet Union. If you do or say you will do something to hurt the image of the state, you end up dieing in a mysterious manner. Just like those 2 RUSADA official who were going to spill the beans.

So does Jarred Tallent get a second 50km walk gold medal upgrade from 2008 to go with his 2012 upgrade over the Russian doper? The Italian who won in 2008 admitted to using PEDS and is now voluntary subjecting himself to 40 blood tests per year where as other walkers do 3 to 5 a year. I didnt hear him say it, but is he claiming he started doping after 2008?
In post 641 up the page, the report that this guy has tested positive again.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Max Headroom

Club Legend
Dec 19, 2014
1,184
1,937
Off with the fairies
AFL Club
Essendon
I didn't know 2 colleagues of Dr Rochenkov (a former Director and the founding chairman of Rusada) both died within a couple of weeks of each other in Feb this year. They resigned in December, after the scandal broke, one was 52 and had a heart attack after skiing.

Dr Rochenkov was safe in the US by then I believe.

Conspiracy theorists will have a field day, cue the Bond theme (I'm visualising bad buys with guns on skis with poisoned stock tips).
 

NoAFLinmycomp

Club Legend
Oct 21, 2014
1,579
2,181
AFL Club
Richmond
Other Teams
Central District
Russians lose their appeal to CAS, track and field out.

Now to see what the IOC does about the rest of the Russian team.

http://www.theage.com.au/sport/olympics/rio-2016/sports-court-rejects-russian-appeal-against-olympic-athletics-ban-20160721-gqb39a.html
Well now, that was an intersting turn of events, wasn't it!

IOC have their confirmation now, time to make a decision.

Question is, will it an AFL-soft-cop-out-controlling-damage-mitigation kind of decision, or something a little more in tune with what is being alleged to have occurred.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

DERIBERATE

Premiership Player
Feb 12, 2010
3,390
5,649
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
Adelaide United, Leeds, Bohemians
Hopefully they delay the decision until all the Russian Athletes have arrived in Rio. Good TV watching the pigs get booted.
 

NoAFLinmycomp

Club Legend
Oct 21, 2014
1,579
2,181
AFL Club
Richmond
Other Teams
Central District
WADA statement ... vindication via CAS, pretty much straight to the point at the end there.



https://www.wada-ama.org/en/media/news/2016-07/wada-satisfied-by-cas-decisions-concerning-the-russian-olympic-committee-and-68

WADA satisfied by CAS decisions concerning the Russian Olympic Committee and 68 Russian Athletes.

The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) is satisfied with the decisions delivered today by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) concerning the arbitrations between the Russian Olympic Committee (ROC), a number of Russian athletes (the Claimant Athletes) and the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF). The CAS has dismissed both the request for arbitration filed by the ROC and 68 Claimant Athletes; and, the appeal filed by 67 of the same athletes against the IAAF decision to consider them as ineligible for the Rio 2016 Olympic Games.

WADA has supported the International Association of Athletics Federation (IAAF) Council decision taken on 17 June to maintain its suspension of the All-Russian Athletics Federation (ARAF). The suspension was first imposed by the IAAF on 13 November 2015 further to the findings of WADA’s Independent Commission into widespread doping in Russian Athletics. Under IAAF Rules, Russian track and field athletes are ineligible to compete in international competitions, including Rio 2016, unless they satisfy specific criteria.

“WADA firmly believes that this is not about punishing some athletes for the actions of others,” said Craig Reedie, WADA President. “It is about the IAAF requiring its member National Federation, ARAF, to live up to the IAAF’s World Anti-Doping Code compliant rules by enforcing them effectively in their jurisdiction,” he continued. “This is vital to ensure that all athletes are competing on a level playing-field.”

As such, it is now up to other International Federations to consider their responsibilities under the World Anti-Doping Code as it relates to their Russian National Federations; and, up to the International Olympic Committee, in accordance with its media release of 19 July, to consider its responsibilities under the Olympic Charter.
 

NoAFLinmycomp

Club Legend
Oct 21, 2014
1,579
2,181
AFL Club
Richmond
Other Teams
Central District
And time to gird your respective loins, for the next batch of failed drug-test announcements ....

https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2016/jul/22/ioc-beijing-london-drug-tests-failed

A further 45 athletes have tested positive for banned substances after a second set of samples provided at the London and Beijing Olympics were reanalysed, the International Olympic Committee has announced.

The number of additional positive tests – comprising 30 athletes from Beijing and 15 from London – takes the total number of athletes who have failed doping tests during the period of reanalysis so far to 98.

The IOC said 23 of the 30 positive tests taken from the Beijing samples involved medallists. The 15 positives from London covered athletes from nine countries and two sports.​
 

RussellEbertHandball

Flick pass expert
Nov 16, 2004
56,293
75,012
SE Oz
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
Other Teams
The Mighty Blacks
Chip has decided to talk about PED's on the world stage in today's Weekend Australian.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/sport/rio-olympics/russians-at-the-rio-olympics-ioc-deliberations-delicately-balanced/news-story/e55e18d6ae43513430160201dc2e57cb
In Soviet-era propaganda they are known as the four phases of disinformation: dismiss, distort, distract and dismay. Within the space of a rambling, half-hour press conference shortly after learning his track and field team would take no part in the Rio Olympics, Russian Sports Minister Vitaly Mutko managed to cover all four.

The existence of a state-sponsored doping program in Russia, a program now threatening to devour all of Russian sport, was curtly dismissed. Evidence gathered by two World Anti-Doping Agency-commissioned reports was misrepresented. Blame for Russia’s self-inflicted scandal was shifted to corrupt officials within the International Association of Athletics Federations, an inept WADA and, of course, jealous Americans who can’t stand to see Russia winning at sport.

As for dismay? “I am really ashamed for this situation, I am ashamed for what is happening right now in sports in and track and field,’’ President Vladimir Putin’s hand-picked minister said with a sad shake of his greying coiffure. “This sets a very dangerous precedent.’’

The world governing body for athletics, the IAAF, backed by a decision delivered on Thursday by the Court of Arbitration for Sport, has indeed taken an unprecedented step. The Soviet Union boycotted the 1984 Los Angeles Games but never before have Russians been ruled out en masse from a major athletics competition, much less an Olympics..........
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/sport/rio-olympics/russians-at-the-rio-olympics-ioc-deliberations-delicately-balanced/news-story/e55e18d6ae43513430160201dc2e57cb
 

Satan

Brownlow Medallist
Nov 16, 2004
16,297
14,232
Location Location
AFL Club
Melbourne
Other Teams
Melbourne

PoppedCorn

Norm Smith Medallist
Dec 29, 2009
8,756
11,712
AFL Club
St Kilda
Other Teams
West Ham 76ers
Is he put there to try and distract people with half a brain who can do some digging?

Puppet is what Puppet does
 

Spongebob

Premiership Player
Sep 18, 2007
4,235
7,621
On a 3-hour tour
AFL Club
West Coast
Other Teams
West Perth, Fighting Illini

NoAFLinmycomp

Club Legend
Oct 21, 2014
1,579
2,181
AFL Club
Richmond
Other Teams
Central District
Yep - soft.

Too hard a decision to make, shove it back on the individual sporting federations. :rolleyes:

Ah well, lots of fun and frivolity for 3-6 years after these Olympics as well, if Beijing & London are anything to go by.

They did manage to make a decision on Stepanova though, deciding against an earlier assessment that she might have been able to compete as a neutral athlete. See "II" in IOC statement.

https://www.olympic.org/news/decision-of-the-ioc-executive-board-concerning-the-participation-of-russian-athletes-in-the-olympic-games-rio-2016


DECISION OF THE IOC EXECUTIVE BOARD CONCERNING THE PARTICIPATION OF RUSSIAN ATHLETES IN THE OLYMPIC GAMES RIO 2016


I.
The IOC Executive Board (EB) has today further studied the question of the participation of Russian athletes in the Olympic Games Rio 2016. In its deliberations, the IOC EB was guided by a fundamental rule of the Olympic Charter to protect clean athletes and the integrity of sport.

The study included the discussion of the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA)’s Independent Person (IP) Report by Prof. Richard McLaren; the decision of the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) on 21 July 2016 concerning the rules of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF); as well as the Olympic Charter and the World Anti-Doping Code.

Given the urgency of the situation, with the Olympic Games Rio 2016 starting in 12 days, and the athletes’ entry process already underway, the IOC EB had to take a preliminary decision with regard to the participation of Russian athletes in Rio de Janeiro. Prof. McLaren states in his report that it “fulfils partially the mandate of the Independent Person”. This is why the IOC supports his request to continue and finalise his work. On the other hand, this situation leads to an urgency for the IOC which does not allow it sufficient time for hearings for affected athletes, officials and organisations.

The IOC EB has given the Russian Olympic Committee (ROC) the opportunity to present the case of the Russian athletes and the ROC. This was done by Mr Alexander Zhukov, ROC President, at the beginning of the EB telephone conference, which he left immediately following his presentation.

During his presentation, Mr. Zhukov explained that the Russian Federation and the ROC guarantee full cooperation with all international organisations to shed light on the issue in every respect. He also guaranteed that the ROC commits to a complete and comprehensive restructuring of the Russian anti-doping system. In this context, he stressed that the ROC is committed to clean sport and would work towards guaranteeing clean sport in Russia.

He further stated that all Russian athletes selected for the Olympic Games Rio 2016 have been tested over the last six months by foreign anti-doping agencies. Samples were taken by foreign doping control officers and the samples analysed in foreign laboratories. Russian athletes who participated in different competitions in all sports have submitted more than 3,000 doping samples. The vast majority of the results were negative.

The IOC EB discussed the status of the ROC. In this respect, it took note of the fact that the IP Report made no findings against the ROC as an institution.

The IOC EB took note of a letter dated 23 July 2016 from the International Shooting Sport Federation (ISSF). In this letter the ISSF confirms having received from WADA information about the three “disappearing samples” concerning shooting. The ISSF states that these three samples had been entered, at the time they were reported, into WADA’s ADAMS Results Management System as positives, and all the result management procedures have already been followed.

On the basis of the Findings of the IP Report, all Russian athletes seeking entry to the Olympic Games Rio 2016 are considered to be affected by a system subverting and manipulating the anti-doping system. The IP Report indicates that, due to “the highly compressed timeline”, the IP has “only skimmed the surface of the extensive data available”. The IOC EB therefore came to the conclusion that this view cannot be restricted only to athletes from the 20 Olympic summer sports mentioned in the IP Report.

Under these exceptional circumstances, Russian athletes in any of the 28 Olympic summer sports have to assume the consequences of what amounts to a collective responsibility in order to protect the credibility of the Olympic competitions, and the “presumption of innocence” cannot be applied to them. On the other hand, according to the rules of natural justice, individual justice, to which every human being is entitled, has to be applied. This means that each affected athlete must be given the opportunity to rebut the applicability of collective responsibility in his or her individual case.

After deliberating, the IOC EB decided:

1. The IOC will not accept any entry of any Russian athlete in the Olympic Games Rio 2016 unless such athlete can meet the conditions set out below.

2. Entry will be accepted by the IOC only if an athlete is able to provide evidence to the full satisfaction of his or her International Federation (IF) in relation to the following criteria:

• The IFs*, when establishing their pool of eligible Russian athletes, to apply the World Anti-Doping Code and other principles agreed by the Olympic Summit (21 June 2016).

• The absence of a positive national anti-doping test cannot be considered sufficient by the IFs.

• The IFs should carry out an individual analysis of each athlete’s anti-doping record, taking into account only reliable adequate international tests, and the specificities of the athlete’s sport and its rules, in order to ensure a level playing field.

• The IFs to examine the information contained in the IP Report, and for such purpose seek from WADA the names of athletes and National Federations (NFs) implicated. Nobody implicated, be it an athlete, an official, or an NF, may be accepted for entry or accreditation for the Olympic Games.

• The IFs will also have to apply their respective rules in relation to the sanctioning of entire NFs.

3. The ROC is not allowed to enter any athlete for the Olympic Games Rio 2016 who has ever been sanctioned for doping, even if he or she has served the sanction.

4. The IOC will accept an entry by the ROC only if the athlete’s IF is satisfied that the evidence provided meets conditions 2 and 3 above and if it is upheld by an expert from the CAS list of arbitrators appointed by an ICAS Member, independent from any sports organisation involved in the Olympic Games Rio 2016.

5. The entry of any Russian athlete ultimately accepted by the IOC will be subject to a rigorous additional out-of-competition testing programme in coordination with the relevant IF and WADA. Any non-availability for this programme will lead to the immediate withdrawal of the accreditation by the IOC.

Beyond these decisions, the IOC EB reaffirmed the provisional measures already taken on 19 July 2016. They remain in place until 31 December 2016, and will be reviewed by the EB in December 2016.

Additional sanctions and measures may be imposed by the IOC following the final report of the IP and due legal procedure by the IOC Disciplinary Commission established on 19 July 2016 under the chairmanship of Mr Guy Canivet (Vice-Chair of the IOC Ethics Commission, former member of the French Constitutional Court and President of the French Cour de Cassation) and the IOC EB.

The IOC EB reaffirms its serious concerns about the obvious deficiencies in the fight against doping. The IOC thus emphasises again its call to WADA to fully review their anti-doping system. The IOC will make its contribution to this review by proposing measures for clearer responsibilities, more transparency, better supervision procedures and more independence.

* The IAAF has already established its eligibility pool with regard to Russian athletes.

II.

The IOC EB further studied the request by the Russian track and field athlete, Mrs Iuliia Stepanova, to compete in the Olympic Games Rio 2016 as a “neutral athlete”. Since Mrs Stepanova declined to compete as a member of the ROC Team, the IOC EB had to consider the question of whether an exception to the rules of the Olympic Charter is possible and appropriate. Since this request has important ethical aspects, the IOC EB had asked the IOC Ethics Commission for its advice. The Ethics Commission has heard Mrs Stepanova and IAAF and ROC representatives.

Mrs Stepanova is basing her request on her role as “whistle-blower” with regard to the manipulation of the anti-doping system and corruption involving the WADA-accredited Moscow Anti-Doping Laboratory, the All-Russia Athletic Federation (ARAF) and the IAAF. The Ethics Commission applauds the contribution of Mrs Stepanova to the fight against doping. It put this contribution into the perspective of Mrs Stepanova’s own long implication, of at least five years, in this doping system and the timing of her whistle-blowing, which came after the system did not protect her any longer following a positive test for which she was sanctioned for doping for the first time.

After a careful evaluation of the arguments, the Ethics Commission gave the following advice to the IOC EB:

“While it is true that Mrs Stepanova’s testimony and public statements have made a contribution to the protection and promotion of clean athletes, fair play and the integrity and authenticity of sport, the Rules of the Olympic Charter related to the organisation of the Olympic Games run counter to the recognition of the status of neutral athlete. Furthermore, the sanction to which she was subject and the circumstances in which she denounced the doping practices which she had used herself, do not satisfy the ethical requirements for an athlete to enter the Olympic Games.”

The IOC EB accepted the advice of the IOC Ethics Commission, also taking into consideration its above-mentioned decision not to allow any Russian athlete who has ever been sanctioned for doping to participate in the Olympic Games Rio 2016. Therefore, the IOC will not enter Mrs Stepanova as a competitor in the Olympic Games Rio 2016.

However, the IOC EB would like to express its appreciation for Mrs Stepanova’s contribution to the fight against doping and to the integrity of sport. Therefore the IOC invites Mrs Stepanova and her husband to the Olympic Games Rio 2016. Furthermore, the IOC is ready to support Mrs Stepanova so that she can continue her sports career and potentially join a National Olympic Committee.

Lausanne, 24 July 2016
 
Last edited:

DERIBERATE

Premiership Player
Feb 12, 2010
3,390
5,649
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
Adelaide United, Leeds, Bohemians
Yep - soft.

Too hard a decision to make, shove it back on the individual sporting federations. :rolleyes:

Ah well, lots of fun and frivolity for 3-6 years after these Olympics as well, if Beijing & London are anything to go by.
Yep.

Leave it to a hundred different federations to decide for themselves in 2 weeks.

(Cartman voice)
Ohhh you ran out of time so sad looks like you can go to the games then
 

nineteen eighty

Norm Smith Medallist
Sep 18, 2003
5,904
5,513
Sydney
AFL Club
Richmond
Other Teams
TIGERS
This is terrible.
Will be hard to accept any victors are not tainted.
Watching Chris Froome hunting his third TDF you sit and wonder if......
Totally unfair but this is the legacy of cheats. They taint the honest too.
Not to derail this thread but does anyone know what Froome's power output was this year? Or in his previous wins? There are some fantastic articles around power output and what is normal vs completely abnormal. Not sure where he sits in his wins.
 

Top Bottom