Australia v Sri Lanka; 2nd Test @ Manuka Oval Feb 1-5.

Kram

I'll brik u
Joined
May 2, 2007
Posts
53,183
Likes
66,631
Location
WA
AFL Club
Fremantle
Other Teams
Chicago Bears, de Boer, Arsenal
The last full season I played I probably dropped more catches than I took, took more catches than I scored runs, and scored more runs than I took wickets.
But, I probably still got pretty close to the most out of my lack of natural ability.
I was pretty good at catching something smashed at us at say point or square leg but anything skied high in the air? Forget it..
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

DamoESP

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Aug 2, 2008
Posts
6,028
Likes
2,682
Location
Perth
AFL Club
Carlton
Other Teams
San Antonio Spurs, Dallas Stars
If you take minnows out of existence, Sangakkara (52.61 average, 29 centuries, 44 fifties) actually has a slightly better average than Tendulkar (51.01 average, 43 centuries, 65 fifties). At least a third of those innings came with Sanga also having to keep wicket in the same match, too.

For those that are curious - Test Batting Averages, without Tests for/against Zimbabwe/Bangladesh/Ireland/Afghanistan (minimum 60 dismissals)
I like that chart, it settles the Smith vs Kohli and Ponting vs Tendulkar debates as well :D
 

JONKOK

All Australian
Joined
Jul 4, 2018
Posts
627
Likes
696
AFL Club
Adelaide
If you take minnows out of existence, Sangakkara (52.61 average, 29 centuries, 44 fifties) actually has a slightly better average than Tendulkar (51.01, 43 centuries, 65 fifties). At least a third of those innings came with Sanga also having to keep wicket in the same match, too.

For those that are curious - Test Batting Averages, without Tests for/against Zimbabwe/Bangladesh/Ireland/Afghanistan (minimum 60 dismissals)
True but A massive amount of Sanga's runs were on Asian wickets.

Tendulkar SENA average: 50+, runs scored: 5837 (36%) Sangakarra SENA average: 44, runs scored:2526 (20%)
 

Howard Littlejohn

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
May 30, 2006
Posts
13,359
Likes
6,754
Location
Canberra
AFL Club
North Melbourne
Probably correct. I'm not a Warner hater but @ 33 I reckon we need to look to the future
Bancroft
Burns
Kwahja
Smith
Head
Patterson
Paine
Bowlers

Looks about as strong as we can field I reckon
I am a Warner hater, but age is BS when selecting a Test side. Best available, every time. The question is coming off such a big break and no FC cricket, no form to point to, is he best available?
The answer has to be that he is the least risky choice, and one which is more likely to pay off. So, he starts despite nothing to back it up. It goes against requiring recent form to get into the team, but the same will apply to Smith. There simply isn't a case based on anything other than guesswork to keep him out.
 

Damon_3388

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 23, 2008
Posts
30,756
Likes
23,475
Location
Headed for Kirribilli House
AFL Club
Collingwood
Other Teams
Norwood, Everton, Detroit Red Wings
True but A massive amount of Sanga's runs were on Asian wickets.

Tendulkar SENA average: 50+, runs scored: 5837 (36%) Sangakarra SENA average: 44, runs scored:2526 (20%)
If you take out matches in Asia (India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka; UAE is not Asia), and keep the minnows out too, the difference in averages isn't really that pronounced - 50.90 for Tendulkar vs. 47.20 for Sanga.

Doing that though is like saying "but most of Ponting's runs came in Australia!" as a means to discount him. All greats do well in their home conditions.

Furthermore, for those that are curious - Test Batting Averages, without Tests for/against Zimbabwe/Bangladesh/Ireland/Afghanistan AND without Tests in India/Pakistan/Sri Lanka (minimum 60 dismissals).

What's most interesting there is how well Rahul Dravid did outside of Asia - 53.13 average (13 centuries, 28 fifties), with just five less tons than Tendulkar in nearly half the number of innings batted.
 

JONKOK

All Australian
Joined
Jul 4, 2018
Posts
627
Likes
696
AFL Club
Adelaide
Doing that though is like saying "but most of Ponting's runs came in Australia!" as a means to discount him. All greats do well in their home conditions.
But we're trying to work out which player was better, so surely this is necessary.

Geographically it is and the wickets are low and slow.
 

Doodlesweaver

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Apr 17, 2010
Posts
12,962
Likes
5,115
Location
London
AFL Club
Fremantle
I'm not sure we should be too worried about England.

They just got fisted twice by the West Indies.

Absolutely fisted.
The Ashes will come down to which team collapses 'best'. So if one team gets done over for 183 first innings and the other team gets done over for 129, the 183 team has collapsed best. Whoever manages that regularly, will win the series. Luckily, I love a good collapse so I'm getting the popcorn ready when the series starts.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Woody15

Club Legend
Joined
Apr 22, 2010
Posts
2,766
Likes
3,270
Location
Somewhere
AFL Club
Collingwood
I am a Warner hater, but age is BS when selecting a Test side. Best available, every time. The question is coming off such a big break and no FC cricket, no form to point to, is he best available?
The answer has to be that he is the least risky choice, and one which is more likely to pay off. So, he starts despite nothing to back it up. It goes against requiring recent form to get into the team, but the same will apply to Smith. There simply isn't a case based on anything other than guesswork to keep him out.
Id like to see Warner selected because not only do I think he is the 2nd best batsman we can pick, but the entertainment value I would derive from watching the English crowd and their players feed it to him will be pretty bloody entertaining.
 

Doodlesweaver

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Apr 17, 2010
Posts
12,962
Likes
5,115
Location
London
AFL Club
Fremantle
If you take out matches in Asia (India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka; UAE is not Asia), and keep the minnows out too, the difference in averages isn't really that pronounced - 50.90 for Tendulkar vs. 47.20 for Sanga.

Doing that though is like saying "but most of Ponting's runs came in Australia!" as a means to discount him. All greats do well in their home conditions.

Furthermore, for those that are curious - Test Batting Averages, without Tests for/against Zimbabwe/Bangladesh/Ireland/Afghanistan AND without Tests in India/Pakistan/Sri Lanka (minimum 60 dismissals).

What's most interesting there is how well Rahul Dravid did outside of Asia - 53.13 average (13 centuries, 28 fifties), with just five less tons than Tendulkar in nearly half the number of innings batted.
Dravid is my favourite all-time Indian batsman. His driving against spin was like silk.
 

Belnakor

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Apr 10, 2005
Posts
18,281
Likes
8,944
Location
Perth
AFL Club
Fremantle
I think T20 internationals are a waste of time personally.
Its kind of weird but when you have a top international side with a top class attack they actually make t20s kind of boring as the batsman have to bat more defensively.

Normal T20 there will normally be 2-3 bowlers who are bowling pies, makes for much more of a spectacle.
 

Doodlesweaver

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Apr 17, 2010
Posts
12,962
Likes
5,115
Location
London
AFL Club
Fremantle
I think T20 internationals are a waste of time personally.
I can't remember the last time I watched a T20I. I must have watched some recently, but I'm stuffed if I can remember. They register like wallpaper does, T20s domestically are far more fun.

I don't mind the Associates T20s if Sky shows them, they can be bloody competitive.
 

Damon_3388

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 23, 2008
Posts
30,756
Likes
23,475
Location
Headed for Kirribilli House
AFL Club
Collingwood
Other Teams
Norwood, Everton, Detroit Red Wings
Geographically it is and the wickets are low and slow.
It's closer to Africa than Asia. The pitches are low, slow roads mostly, rather than having the same spin factor that Asia does, and the weather doesn't have the humidity conducing to swing, either.
 

The Convert

All Australian
Joined
Jan 8, 2009
Posts
751
Likes
118
Location
slightly off centre
AFL Club
Sydney
Other Teams
Box Hill Hawks
Its kind of weird but when you have a top international side with a top class attack they actually make t20s kind of boring as the batsman have to bat more defensively.

Normal T20 there will normally be 2-3 bowlers who are bowling pies, makes for much more of a spectacle.
You mean BBL. Why xo pele watch blokes they can see in the park on saturday
 

Damon_3388

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 23, 2008
Posts
30,756
Likes
23,475
Location
Headed for Kirribilli House
AFL Club
Collingwood
Other Teams
Norwood, Everton, Detroit Red Wings
Its kind of weird but when you have a top international side with a top class attack they actually make t20s kind of boring as the batsman have to bat more defensively.

Normal T20 there will normally be 2-3 bowlers who are bowling pies, makes for much more of a spectacle.
I can't remember the last time I watched a T20I. I must have watched some recently, but I'm stuffed if I can remember. They register like wallpaper does, T20s domestically are far more fun.
Pretty funny when you look at some of the names that have represented Australia in T20Is (who also either only played a few ODIs, or didn't play in any other format), too:

Mick Lewis
Shane Harwood
Luke Pomersbach
Brett Geeves
Ben Laughlin
Travis Birt
Ben Rohrer
James Muirhead
Cameron Boyce
Ben Dunk
Nathan Reardon

I know most of those guys specifically excelled in the T20 format, leading to their selection, but they're not really names that you associate with being international cricketers.
 

Damon_3388

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 23, 2008
Posts
30,756
Likes
23,475
Location
Headed for Kirribilli House
AFL Club
Collingwood
Other Teams
Norwood, Everton, Detroit Red Wings
After this series ends straight into the nets with the Duke ball.
Is it really that different?

And why do we play Test cricket with different balls in different countries? Surely there'd be an accepted "standard" that could be used and imported everywhere.
 

Adelaide Hawk

Hall of Famer
Joined
Sep 21, 2002
Posts
45,345
Likes
34,016
Location
Adelaide
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Other Teams
Norwood
Dravid is my favourite all-time Indian batsman. His driving against spin was like silk.
Yes, I used to enjoy watching Dravid. He's possibly my favourite Indian batsman. VVS Laxman is up there as well. Favourite India bowler is Bishen Bedi, and always will be. An absolute master spinner who didn't need sleeves buttoned to the wrists to weave his magic.
 

Woody15

Club Legend
Joined
Apr 22, 2010
Posts
2,766
Likes
3,270
Location
Somewhere
AFL Club
Collingwood
Pretty funny when you look at some of the names that have represented Australia in T20Is (who also either only played a few ODIs, or didn't play in any other format), too:

Mick Lewis
Shane Harwood
Luke Pomersbach
Brett Geeves
Ben Laughlin
Travis Birt
Ben Rohrer
James Muirhead
Cameron Boyce
Ben Dunk
Nathan Reardon

I know most of those guys specifically excelled in the T20 format, leading to their selection, but they're not really names that you associate with being international cricketers.
Could have been a very good player Pomersbach. Unfortunate.
 

Doodlesweaver

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Apr 17, 2010
Posts
12,962
Likes
5,115
Location
London
AFL Club
Fremantle
Yes, I used to enjoy watching Dravid. He's possibly my favourite Indian batsman. VVS Laxman is up there as well. Favourite India bowler is Bishen Bedi, and always will be. An absolute master spinner who didn't need sleeves buttoned to the wrists to weave his magic.
VS Laxman was very graceful too. I somehow convinced myself he was a leftie, he was so graceful so every time I saw him bat I'd be like 'waaat'? Then when he'd get out or the match was finished, I'd go back to thinking he was left-handed. Very strange.
 
Top Bottom