Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Head's record against all opponents pretty bad other than woeful Sri Lankans who he beat up in Australia.Head isn't doing terribly bad in comparison to Clarke:
Michael Clarke after first 22 innings (15 matches) of test career
100s: 2
50s: 3
HS: 151
Ave: 40.38
Runs: 848
Age: 25
Travis Head after first 22 innings (12 matches) of test career
100s: 1
50s: 6
HS: 161
Runs: 854
Ave: 42.70
Age: 25
Also worth noting that both players featured in an Ashes series and a subcontinental tour (Clarke - Ind '04 & Eng '05, Head - UAE '18 & Eng '19). People forget that Head is still pretty young so has a lot of improvement left in him.
I'm not a Bancroft fan but who else is there?
Harris- dreadful in the Ashes, poor in the A game
Khawaja- dead set struggling to hit it off the square
Renshaw- no runs
Dan hughes- wasn't picked in the A Game
Street- too early
Honestly who else is there? Batting stocks are terrible
Renshaw has gone so far backwards its insane.
I thought we had a bit of a prodigy on our hands a few years back.
That's true, and neither can I.Pup's first innings was a killer in India at age 23. Can't imagine Head doing that.
The woeful Sri Lanka who beat South Africa in South Africa 2-0 a month later?Head's record against all opponents pretty bad other than woeful Sri Lankans who he beat up in Australia.
The woeful Sri Lanka who beat South Africa in South Africa 2-0 a month later?
Different opposition & conditions in Saf. Head's only test century vs inexperienced medium pacers from Asia in Canberra.The woeful Sri Lanka who beat South Africa in South Africa 2-0 a month later?
Michael Clarke's first test, comes in at 4-149, behind Langer, Hayden, Katich, Martyn and Lehmann, and with Gilchrist next in. The worst career batting average of that lot belongs to Lehmann, at 44.95. Australia hadn't lost a series for three years, to anyone, anywhere. Good innings? Absolutely, no argument.Pup's first innings was a killer in India at age 23. Can't imagine Head doing that.
Outside of Sri Lankan series averages 30. Head needs to tighten technique around offside. Clarke never had such a flaw & finished his career with fine record. Greg Blewitt would be better comparison with Head.Michael Clarke's first test, comes in at 4-149, behind Langer, Hayden, Katich, Martyn and Lehmann, and with Gilchrist next in. The worst career batting average of that lot belongs to Lehmann, at 44.95. Australia hadn't lost a series for three years, to anyone, anywhere. Good innings? Absolutely, no argument.
Travis Head's first test, yep, a duck in the first dig, but then in the second innings?
Comes in at 3-87, having lost both the Marsh brothers for ducks, still 374 runs behind, and with 18 overs to go on the fourth day. Next man in is also on debut, and the number seven hasn't hit a FC ton in about ten years.
We're a ******* rabble at this stage, mind you, with captain and vice-captain both still suspended. If he gets out cheaply, we lose, probably don't even make it to stumps on day four. But he bats for more than three hours, scoring 72 runs himself (second highest scorer), and we save the game.
Saving that test should go down as one of the great Australian performances of the decade, and while Khawaja is rightly man of the match, it doesn't happen without Travis Head. On debut.
If we're picking stats to suit our argument, I could retort by saying his average in Australia is 60.Outside of Sri Lankan series averages 30. Head needs to tighten technique around offside. Clarke never had such a flaw & finished his career with fine record. Greg Blewitt would be better comparison with Head.
If we're picking stats to suit our argument, I could retort by saying his average in Australia is 60.
Look, no-one is saying he'll end up as good a cricketer as Michael Clarke. But he's going OK, and given there are no stand-out replacements taking his spot, it's his as long as he performs.
Surely someone has to be good?Are SA that good though...especially minus ABDV
No one in cricket is ever good, except us sometimes and India.Surely someone has to be good?
Bumrah is good, so too Archer & Broad. How did Head go against them?Surely someone has to be good?
He has done it twice, both in the same test. Here's the listHe better not get caught at 3rd man again then...he’s done that way too often in a test match! That’s a cardinal sin.
Little OT, but could anyone confirm that the whole of the first three levels of the G have sold out for the first day of the Boxing Day test? Or so they release more tickets closer to the day.. surly it won’t sell out..??
Based on what?Renshaw has gone so far backwards its insane.
I thought we had a bit of a prodigy on our hands a few years back.
Does anyone know what’s happened to Mohammed Abbas? Took ten-fer against us not that long ago (in the desert no less!) but seems to have dropped off the face of the earth.
Has 66 test wickets at 18 and can’t get a game unless I’ve missed something.
Didn't they have to pretty much play an entire 2nd string bowling lineup against us? They were back to full strength or close to against SA from memory.The woeful Sri Lanka who beat South Africa in South Africa 2-0 a month later?