Australian ODI squad Announced

Remove this Banner Ad

The last V-Line train on a Sunday for some lines is well before the end of the game.

Looks fine to me. Game should finish about 10-15 pm.

Plenty of time to meet up with departing services to country regions at Southern Cross station for trains or coaches.
Geelong line
After the game:

  • Additional seating will be available on the 11.10pm train service from Southern Cross to Waurn Ponds.

Ballarat/Wendouree line

After the game:

  • The 10.56pm train service from Southern Cross to Wendouree is altered to depart at 11.06pm.
Bendigo line
After the game:

  • An additional train service will depart Southern Cross at 11.18pm,
Traralgon/Bairnsdale line
After the game:

  • A special coach service will depart Southern Cross at 11.10pm, stopping as required at stations from Nar Nar Goon to Traralgon.
Seymour/Shepparton line
After the game:




    • A special coach service will depart Southern Cross at 11.15pm, stopping as required at stations from Donnybrook to Seymour.
 
Averaged 22 in his last 20 ODIs. That's how

Given the last ODI was ages ago and Maxwell's form in both the Shield and BBL has been outstanding, I think Boof's looking for excuses. You can only use current exposed form, not old form from quite a while ago. White and Tye are in the side on BBL form. How else does he get back in the team if there's no one-days of any form around. I'm happy with the side selected but Boof's reasons are simply full of s**t.

Using the same theory how did Tim Paine get selected this summer even if it was a terrific selection in hindsight? Who would've Marsh's would've been excellent Test players this year given previous form (hopefully they can keep it up). They, like White and Tye too, got picked on current form. If you're going to use those reasons for an omission at least be consistent.
 
Last edited:

Log in to remove this ad.

Given the last ODI was ages ago and Maxwell's form in both the Shield and BBL has been outstanding, I think Boof's looking for excuses. You can only use current exposed form, not old form from quite a while ago. White and Tye are in the side on BBL form. How else does he get back in the team if there's no one-days of any form around. I'm happy with the side selected but Boof's reasons are simply full of s**t.

Using the same theory how did Tim Paine get selected this summer even if it was a terrific selection in hindsight? Who would've Marsh's would've been excellent Test players this year given previous form (hopefully they can keep it up). They, like White and Tye too, got picked on current form. If you're going to use those reasons for an omission at least be consistent.
Tye probably also gets his spot based on his excellent JLT series and skills as a death bowler. Unlike Maxwell, who is similar in role to Head, there’s not huge competition for Tye’s role. Whether he’s successful or not remains to be seen.
 
Tye probably also gets his spot based on his excellent JLT series and skills as a death bowler. Unlike Maxwell, who is similar in role to Head, there’s not huge competition for Tye’s role. Whether he’s successful or not remains to be seen.

As I spent October drinking piss in the USA (back to regular weight now..haha) I have no idea how the JLT series went. Just had a look. Tye only played 3 games (I might've missed one) but they were 3 really good games. As for White he just played a couple and they were nothing short of terrible, so he was definitely picked on BBL form.
 
As I spent October drinking piss in the USA (back to regular weight now..haha) I have no idea how the JLT series went. Just had a look. Tye only played 3 games (I might've missed one) but they were 3 really good games. As for White he just played a couple and they were nothing short of terrible, so he was definitely picked on BBL form.
Tye and Jhye Richardson were both picked on good JLT form.
 
Given the last ODI was ages ago and Maxwell's form in both the Shield and BBL has been outstanding, I think Boof's looking for excuses. You can only use current exposed form, not old form from quite a while ago. White and Tye are in the side on BBL form. How else does he get back in the team if there's no one-days of any form around. I'm happy with the side selected but Boof's reasons are simply full of s**t.

Using the same theory how did Tim Paine get selected this summer even if it was a terrific selection in hindsight? Who would've Marsh's would've been excellent Test players this year given previous form (hopefully they can keep it up). They, like White and Tye too, got picked on current form. If you're going to use those reasons for an omission at least be consistent.

If the selections were based on BBL form then Short and Turner would be far ahead of Maxwell.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

As I spent October drinking piss in the USA (back to regular weight now..haha) I have no idea how the JLT series went. Just had a look. Tye only played 3 games (I might've missed one) but they were 3 really good games. As for White he just played a couple and they were nothing short of terrible, so he was definitely picked on BBL form.

the selectors mentioned White's domestic one day form over the past several seasons.
 
I only really saw the first 10 overs of England's innings proper and then sporadically through the rest of the innings but I feel for Tye. Didn't take a wicket but bowled pretty tight (4.3 Rpo when 4 of the 7 bowlers went at >7 Rpo) and had to come on after they'd score 50+ after 5 overs.
 
I've only got back into cricket over the past year or so, but I must say the 50 over game will be gone from existence in the next five to ten years or so.

As for selection, the Australian test team is looking really good. Mitch Marsh is actually immensely talented and will eventually be a fantastic player if not right now. I think the only shaky spot in the test team right now is Bancroft and I don't understand that how a good looking one day player in Finch can't transition his game into the test side, if he can get another ton in the one day series it should give them something to really think about. But, they dropped Maxwell after his excellent form so anything's possible with the selectors.

The one day side is not taken seriously, Australia's last 50 games ranks us below Afghanistan, WTF! That clearly says more than anything that Australia give this dying game not much thought.

That said, at full strength the Australian one day side should be a formidable force.

If Head has a couple more fails then Maxwell should jump the que and come into the side.
 
Probably just end up playing Stoinis and Mitch Marsh in the games now.
Not heard whom replacing in squad for Lynn but if after a batsman I suspect Burns is the man if the resting up Shaun Marsh for South African Test tour.

You could, though 4 Front line bowlers +Marsh, Stoinis and Head would be overkill.

Well they played both of them without replacing Lynn in actual 11.

Cameron White replaces Chris Lynn in the ODI squad. Will miss the derby on Friday night.

and then does not play on Sunday anyway.. ha ha.

Scheduling and common sense at this time of year still needs some work at Cricket Australia.
 
I hope they learned a lesson from picking a specialist T20 bowler into a 50 over game.
For mine I doubted he had the natural normal cricket wicket strike taking ability and sure enough , no wickets. I know it is only one game but writing was on the wall to start with. Anyway, I do not knock him given an opportunity, just thought it was flawed idea to start with. Richardson was fair enough as he would be a genuine wicket taker. Tye not so much. Problem is now they will rest Cummings and the side will probably still play Tye.
 
I hope they learned a lesson from picking a specialist T20 bowler into a 50 over game.
For mine I doubted he had the natural normal cricket wicket strike taking ability and sure enough , no wickets. I know it is only one game but writing was on the wall to start with. Anyway, I do not knock him given an opportunity, just thought it was flawed idea to start with. Richardson was fair enough as he would be a genuine wicket taker. Tye not so much. Problem is now they will rest Cummings and the side will probably still play Tye.

The guy went at 4.3 runs an over. I think the selectors are worried about depth bowling as well with Starc our only real depth bowler in the side after Faulkner turned to shite. It’s unfortunate Tye was used earlier and never got the chance to show what he’s got under the pressure situation he was picked for. I hope he’s picked again - we need the depth bowling and as long as he can be solid enough through the middle he’s worth picking imo (but maybe not when the big three are available).
 
The guy went at 4.3 runs an over.
Yes, there is no doubt his economy rate can be good but unless you picked in side as an allrounder, a bowler that is first change, I want to be a strike bowler. I do not sense he is for this form of cricket. I could be proved wrong, hopefully, but sense he is not.
 
I hope they learned a lesson from picking a specialist T20 bowler into a 50 over game.
For mine I doubted he had the natural normal cricket wicket strike taking ability and sure enough , no wickets. I know it is only one game but writing was on the wall to start with. Anyway, I do not knock him given an opportunity, just thought it was flawed idea to start with. Richardson was fair enough as he would be a genuine wicket taker. Tye not so much. Problem is now they will rest Cummings and the side will probably still play Tye.
I don't understand how Tye could cop criticism for his debut performance where he was easily the tightest of our bowlers.

And if Tye is a specialist T20 bowler why does he have such a good List A record?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top