mutant20958
Debutant
- Apr 8, 2025
- 91
- 156
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
Once all of our best players all make a strong contribution every week, we will be winning. Too many boys going ghost at the moment
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Put Treacy or Voss in our forward line and we win that game. Get a KP player who can take a contested mark FFS……or at least one that can halve them.We didn’t deserve to win last week and we were the better team this week and lost.
Having forwards that could mark the ball was the difference.
Literally Treacy was a massive difference because he gave them a marking target who took his marks.
The selection of Kallan Dawson was a massive blunder. What a ****ing potato.
A smaller LMac kept Voss quiet. He ran riot against Dawson. Tell him to clean his locker out the spud.
For real?ABC radio just freo have all the umpires pictures and names up in their rooms![]()
Larkey usually only gets the ball out the back. He needs to start playing like a key forward. A few out the back in the last doesn't make it a good game. Step up big fella.Great effort to compete right to the end. Nice to see Larkey lift in the last but would love to see him run at the ball carrier more often. We needed to be a little more composed and cleaner with the footy at key moments. Luke Mc played well. Hated the WA biased commentary
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I disagree.The only metric that matters is is wins.
For real?
Somebody call security. Dinkeses account has been hijacked.From where our bar has been for the last five years, I wouldn't too hard on us. This is the stage we've all wanted. Could have won, didn't capitalise when we should have .
But were very competitive. Someone said it was a better result than last week and it was.
Thought Fisher showed a bit and was clean.
RHJ reads the play so well, just needs to remain in the contest, made a difference when he came on.
Can see why we wanted Whitlock .
FOS - wow so cool and sees it unfold and has time, so valuable having a player who has time.
Glad that Larks got involved.
Konstanty had some great moments.
A lot to like even without the points.
Same thing was said and happened at our place.I had a moment late in the game where I though, geeze McDonald has had a really cracking, solid game. I kid you not, he then handballed the ball straight to the grass. I honestly thought there were Big Brother spies in my head.
Yeah, I know. I'm probably biased as I wanted us to pick him so bad.Ok now do every single other player that played tonight.
The only metric that matters is wins.
Genuinely - belly was saying he set it up like thatFor real?
So why were you whinging so much last week?The only metric that matters is wins.
60 I50’s would have to be the most in 6 years.The story of our season.
Piss poor forward efficiency and a complete inability to capitalise on any momentum.
Because the performance would’ve been lucky to beat a VFL side.So why were you whinging so much last week?
So where does the money come from - especially when we are finished in Tassie - certainly not from game attendance in Melbourne - not ideal but get realCouldn't be more impressed by the effort of the players, smashed our record for inside 50 tackles for one. That it didn't translate to a smashing on the scoreboard leads to serious concerns as to the effectiveness of the gameplan.
But my worst fears have been realised, a tiny loss from a sold home game. If that was at Docklands we win that game and keep our season alive. With the reality of a loss now we're buried for 2025.
I'm so pissed off at the club for putting money ahead of winning. Gagf.
Except it did. It counts as a W in the history books. It counts for 4 points on the ladder.Because the performance would’ve been lucky to beat a VFL side.
What does posting stuff like this do for you? Apart from make an obviously intelligent person seem like a reactionary moron who is unable to change their mind based on obvious evidence?“Proud of the guys”, “great we got back in it”, “probably shouldn’t have been in that position in the firstplace though”, “there are some players that shouldn’t be in the team”, “potentially 4 or 5 that should be”, “forward line needs work”, “when is LDU going to prove he’s worth that contract”
- Me, 2031.
Look enough about Pink , but Logue has also has his share of doubters. What he has is a big arse as is hard to move. Thought he was good.
justified his selection. It’s not individual losses.I disagree.
If you’re gonna simplify it that far, it’d be more accurate to say: all that matters is silverware.
You don’t build a sustainable brand of footy capable of winning silverware by obsessing over individual wins and losses.
Treacy might not have kicked any goals, and I love Pinky, but Treacy absolutely dominated him tonight let's be realTreacy and Amiss both kept goalless. Got their weaknesses, but Logue and Pink did their jobs.
FOS soccer goal...urghWhen you lose by 6 yet controlled majority of the game all the “we ****ed up” moments shine brightly:
Daniels/Sheezel 50
LDU fumble on the wing in the last
McDonald handball
There’s more but its milk, cookies and ninnies time.