He's battled to get back into the team. He's given it all. I wonder if its worse than what the club think it is.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
6 weeks (only 3 during H&A season) is not long enough for a long term injury to give another elevation. That's 8 weeks.Lambert surely a big chance to get promoted and play round 1 now
Had him as a sub for round 1. Injuries seem to have taken the zip out of him last year. Seems more a battler now in most of the games he played last year.I like Foley. And nothing would please me more than being wrong, but I believe the line up is better without him. Of course you would never want an injury to happen to anybody, but from an on field perspective I'm not too concerned.
Rd 1 starts in a month, so he cant go onto the L.T.I as he would only be out for 2 weeks or so.L.T.I promote 2 rookies best performed stays up
yeah me too. if it does not linger, ie its really just a three week injury he has a chance to keep his career imo.
Rd 1 starts in a month, so he cant go onto the L.T.I as he would only be out for 2 weeks or so.
The Achilles was a three week injury............
Yeah thats my worry. It was my slight dig at the club when I said a "real 3 weeks". If it goes on for half a year, I see him either retiring at the end of the year or if he cracks the side late in the year and shows some OK form then off to GWS for a year or two.
I was walking behind Axel at the doggies game. He looked proppy just walking and one leg (left I think) is appreciably smaller than the other - almost no calf muscle. Doesn't look good which is shitty.
Who else do you expect to get promoted? I was thinking lambert as the only promotion, and he should be front runner now6 weeks (only 3 during H&A season) is not long enough for a long term injury to give another elevation. That's 8 weeks.
When a player goes onto the L.T.I it is for a MIN of 8 weeks that they have to be out for. Also it starts at rd1 and not now. So essentially he would be out for the first 8 weeks. So when I said 2 weeks, they are sort of saying he goes onto the list now and only out for a few games(of which we could upgrade another player) but that isn't the way it works.I'm not sure what your saying here theflea ....Oh I just read it a few more times. Are you saying that LTI"S have to be out for 6-8 weeks of the season it's self to be able to upgrade a rookie ?
Why? Just because he's a mature body. Remember this is his first preseason with us, he needs to learn our game plan first and he's only had one NAB Cup game to get used to it. Thomas & Arnott have been with us longer and are probably on their last chance so will probably get first run at the rookie elevation prior to Round 1.Who else do you expect to get promoted? I was thinking lambert as the only promotion, and he should be front runner now
Yeah fair point, I forgot about arnott. I don't really rate thomas to much. And depends on the rest of the pre season obviously but i'd still lean towards lambert just to add new and fresh rather than try the same players over and over. Will be interesting to see the battle between thoswe 3 for the spot.Why? Just because he's a mature body. Remember this is his first preseason with us, he needs to learn our game plan first and he's only had one NAB Cup game to get used to it. Thomas & Arnott have been with us longer and are probably on their last chance so will probably get first run at the rookie elevation prior to Round 1.
Let's see how they go for the rest of the NAB Cup. Lambert was very good in Q1 against the Dogs, but Arnott was better across the entire game. They both had limited time on the ground though.
When a player goes onto the L.T.I it is for a MIN of 8 weeks that they have to be out for. Also it starts at rd1 and not now. So essentially he would be out for the first 8 weeks. So when I said 2 weeks, they are sort of saying he goes onto the list now and only out for a few games(of which we could upgrade another player) but that isn't the way it works.
I feel for the guy. Seems like a top bloke and was once a great player. But I was honestly staggered when we re-signed him. Don't think he will make it back this time.
Sends a strong message to the playing group maybe ? We stand by you, when you stand by us (Loyalty a 2 way street).....+ if Axel gets through his issues we get another very good Mid...
GWS. lol. As if.
They are saying now it looks more like 9-10 weeks