Discussion Bad Graphic Design

Remove this Banner Ad

WonderT

The realistic logo guy
Apr 11, 2019
62
939
AFL Club
Geelong
Other Teams
Renegades
The Geelong Advertiser back at it with an old Melbourne logo on the back page.
View attachment 898611

So it seemed that the Geelong Advertiser fixed their mistake and used the correct Melbourne logo on Friday's paper.
IMG_20200627_131959.jpg


Then today decided to reverse the fix and go back to the old one. Strange
IMG_20200627_131946.jpg
 
Dec 20, 2015
3,471
5,185
South Australia
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
Other Teams
Port Adelaide Magpies!

Log in to remove this ad.

Rapper Pop Smoke unfortunately passed away in February and his debut album is set to come out soon. The cover was designed by Virgil Abloh who as I’m sure most of you know is the man behind Off-White and a very famous designer. The cover itself is getting flamed online and will now be changed. Personally I think the concept is cool, the execution though is terrible. Whatever Virgil did to erase the background behind Pop (which is the first photo that comes up when you google his name) looks incredibly amateurish above his hair.
4E2D7375-7D3E-4309-B7EF-EBBF7814C538.jpeg
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

DDF504B4-4431-45BA-A03A-5E904629A7F9.jpeg
5948D5D6-4C0C-4A4D-AD98-A9A34F65FC91.jpeg


Found these in Bunnings yesterday, they’re supposed to be plant pots with a digital print.

Only problem is, the digital print wouldn’t have been any bigger than 500x500px, meaning it looks pixelated af on the print.
 
Jun 24, 2011
26,145
16,342
Adelaide
AFL Club
Carlton
Other Teams
ΠΓΣΣ LFC Sturt Steelers Nix
Also there is no stroke around the port logo. Whereas the Geelong, North, and Saints logos all have an appropriate white border around the logo to distinguish it against the background.
That could be in their branding guidelines for that old logo... The black of the logo is an outline in itself.
 
View attachment 911382View attachment 911383

Found these in Bunnings yesterday, they’re supposed to be plant pots with a digital print.

Only problem is, the digital print wouldn’t have been any bigger than 500x500px, meaning it looks pixelated af on the print.

Was in a clothes shop with my wife once and saw a summer dress that had a digital texture screen printed all over it, couldn't have been more than 200x200. So blocky and had jpeg artifacts all over it. I almost threw up.
 
Was in a clothes shop with my wife once and saw a summer dress that had a digital texture screen printed all over it, couldn't have been more than 200x200. So blocky and had jpeg artifacts all over it. I almost threw up.
I once saw a tshirt with the Shutterstock watermark on it
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back