Remove this Banner Ad

Moved Thread Bailey Smith vs Sam Walsh

Who's better


  • Total voters
    182
  • Poll closed .

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Actually I like the dogs and just brought up the premierships discussion to not get ahead of himself by bragging about one recent premiership.

Let's get back on topic, Walsh played better than last week but still not the heights of last year. For me I think he's trying to adjust to his heavier frame so he may be less mobile in 2020 than last year.

Smith again a strong week.

Will be a good season watch both players, without getting into a pissing contest about whose club is more successful.
Agreed, you have always been a level headed poster.
I watched Sam for the first time tonight for a whole game, and he comes across as a young Marc Murphy type, he gets on some good chains but his disposal kicks are not directed to a player i noticed, they were kicks of hope it looked like.
 
Does that Change the fact you were wrong calling him a loss. He’s been injured for over 18 months in his first 3 years at Carlton. First full pre season and look what he produces. Maybe dogs supporters should shut the fu** up about previous Carlton first rounders. I’m getting quite sick of it actually.

Do you know what a fact is? I didn't call him a loss at all. I just corrected you when you made up that he was 3 years younger than he is. I responded to you with a fact, you replied by saying I said something that I hadn't whilst bypassing the swear filter and telling people to shut up.
 
NEither does bailey smith deserve to be In this conversation. What the fu** has he done.Walsh just grabbed a lazy 9 in the first quarter today. No one batted an eyelid. That’s because it’s expected. Someone like smith does anything they like to put him up against the best.
Didn't see much of last night's game so had a quick look to see whether stats back up your statement.

Last night Walsh scored 99 in supercoach and about 7 in champion data points.
Cunningham scored 102 supercoach points about 7 champion data points.

Bailey Smith scored about 13 champion data points and 93 supercoach points on Thursday night but is averaging 106.5 supercoach points across the season.

So based on unbiased statistical measures it would seem that your statement is wildly inaccurate.
 
NEither does bailey smith deserve to be In this conversation. What the fu** has he done.Walsh just grabbed a lazy 9 in the first quarter today. No one batted an eyelid. That’s because it’s expected. Someone like smith does anything they like to put him up against the best.
Didn't see much of last night's game so had a quick look to see whether stats back up your statement.

Last night Walsh scored 99 in supercoach and about 7 in champion data points.
Cunningham scored 102 supercoach points about 7 champion data points.

Bailey Smith scored about 13 champion data points and 93 supercoach points on Thursday night but is averaging 106.5 supercoach points across the season.

So based on unbiased statistical measures it would seem that your statement is wildly inaccurate.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Didn't see much of last night's game so had a quick look to see whether stats back up your statement.

Last night Walsh scored 99 in supercoach and about 7 in champion data points.
Cunningham scored 102 supercoach points about 7 champion data points.

Bailey Smith scored about 13 champion data points and 93 supercoach points on Thursday night but is averaging 106.5 supercoach points across the season.

So based on unbiased statistical measures it would seem that your statement is wildly inaccurate.

If you want to use SuperCoach points, Smith is only doing what Walsh has already done for basically a full season in his first year.

It easy for people to forget how good Walsh was last year. He’s had a rough start to the season but was great last night. Short memories, or more like selective ones.
 
Didn't see much of last night's game so had a quick look to see whether stats back up your statement.

Last night Walsh scored 99 in supercoach and about 7 in champion data points.
Cunningham scored 102 supercoach points about 7 champion data points.

Bailey Smith scored about 13 champion data points and 93 supercoach points on Thursday night but is averaging 106.5 supercoach points across the season.

So based on unbiased statistical measures it would seem that your statement is wildly inaccurate.
And if there is one thing we can all agree on it’s that champion data ranking points are a great way of judging players even without watching the game!
 
And if there is one thing we can all agree on it’s that champion data ranking points are a great way of judging players even without watching the game!
I agree that there's no ideal way of measuring the quality of a player's game but these ranking points at least attempt to measure the value of a player's game based on the impact of a possession rather than just counting them and do so without bias which I think most supporters struggle to do.
My post was also a response to another poster suggesting that Cunningham's game was better than anything Smith has done and that Smith doesn't deserve to be compared to Walsh which by at least 2 unbiased measures is not correct.
 
Can we stop and pause for a second, close our eyes and try to imagine how good Walsh would be in a midfield that had Bont, Dunkley, Macrae and Liberatore in it.

Close thread.

Not sure if we can because apparently the threads closed? But whilst our eyes are shut can we also imagine that in a midfield that contains Bont, Dunkley, Macrae and Liberatore, it’s the 19 year old in Smith who would be currently winning the best and fairest.
 
Not sure if we can because apparently the threads closed? But whilst our eyes are shut can we also imagine that in a midfield that contains Bont, Dunkley, Macrae and Liberatore, it’s the 19 year old in Smith who would be currently winning the best and fairest.

And how do you think he'd be performing without them?

You know, without them getting the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th best opposition mids every week.
 
And how do you think he'd be performing without them?

You know, without them getting the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th best opposition mids every week.

With his ability to win his own ball and strength I think he would still perform without them. Being part of a good midfield can obviously be beneficial, but its ridiculous and arrogant to say that the one point you raise equals close thread. Particularly seeing Libba and Dunkley have both missed games this season and Smith has stood up in their absence. Also, pretty sure the focus of the opposition most weeks when playing Carlton is Cripps, not Walsh.

Conversely, if Walsh was at the Dogs do you think he would spend as much time in the midfield as he has at Carlton? Would he have got the same opportunities or would he also spend time playing out of his preferred position a lot of the time like Smith last year?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

With his ability to win his own ball and strength I think he would still perform without them. Being part of a good midfield can obviously be beneficial, but its ridiculous and arrogant to say that the one point you raise equals close thread. Particularly seeing Libba and Dunkley have both missed games this season and Smith has stood up in their absence. Also, pretty sure the focus of the opposition most weeks when playing Carlton is Cripps, not Walsh.

Conversely, if Walsh was at the Dogs do you think he would spend as much time in the midfield as he has at Carlton? Would he have got the same opportunities or would he also spend time playing out of his preferred position a lot of the time like Smith last year?

Close thread.

Smith only wins ball because pitted against the 4th stringers each week.


He's not a spud, don't get me wrong. But to use an analogy, he's drawn barrier 3 and carrying 49kgs in a WFA race getting to learn his craft in that midfield.

He's doing Ok. TBH I actually exoected much more given the leg up he's had.
 
Close thread.

Smith only wins ball because pitted against the 4th stringers each week.


He's not a spud, don't get me wrong. But to use an analogy, he's drawn barrier 3 and carrying 49kgs in a WFA race getting to learn his craft in that midfield.

He's doing Ok. TBH I actually exoected much more given the leg up he's had.

Thanks for this reply, I now know you're not worth wasting any further time on :)
 
Can we stop and pause for a second, close our eyes and try to imagine how good Walsh would be in a midfield that had Bont, Dunkley, Macrae and Liberatore in it.


Close thread.
I'm not sure these types of hypothetical arguments hold much water.
You could just as easily say that if Smith played for Carlton last year and was starting in the midfield instead of being played out of position in the forward line he would have won the rising star.
Not sure Walsh would have offered the dogs much as a forward.
 
I'm not sure these types of hypothetical arguments hold much water.
You could just as easily say that if Smith played for Carlton last year and was starting in the midfield instead of being played out of position in the forward line he would have won the rising star.
Not sure Walsh would have offered the dogs much as a forward.
Except for much of the year Walsh was on the wing. We all know long term he’ll be a full time inside mid.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

This post aged well muppet. Cuningham best on. Just had a better game than bailey has had all year.
Are we still reacting based on individual games? Cuningham back to about his career average tonight.

Walsh played poorly too, a few bad moments. He'll turn it around though, without a doubt.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Moved Thread Bailey Smith vs Sam Walsh

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top