Remove this Banner Ad

Banfield ineffective hack

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

LOL at you having to use a irrelevant pre season game to highlight how we allegedly got reamed.

Will be gun, 8 goals in the VFL is proof of this

So? Hendo used to dominate the QAFL each week. But he always fails at AFL level. And massive LOL at getting his stat when he was playing the worst team in the VFL.

Michael Coad is not a kid.

He got injured in the first term.
 
Yarran, Banfield---------------------------------------Space and time------------Universe----------------------------------------->Hodge
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Hope you're not hanging your hat on a VFL game against the Gold Coast. They're a side of kids playing against men.
That's exactly what he is doing. Delusional.
 
Is that it, just the one?

They're a pack of kids playing against a senior VFL side. They've been smashed all year.

Oh dear :o:o Their biggest loss before this week was 36 points, they have 1 win and a draw.

Carlton has the best depth hence the smashing.
 
Oh dear :o:o Their biggest loss before this week was 36 points, they have 1 win and a draw.

Carlton has the best depth hence the smashing.
Yeah, whatever.:rolleyes:

When he replicates those performances in the big league you MAY be listened to, until then............
 
LOL at you having to use a irrelevant pre season game to highlight how we allegedly got reamed.

Will be gun, 8 goals in the VFL is proof of this

Jay Schulz has kicked 8 goals in the VFL on multiple occasions. Lynden Dunn (who?) kicked 10 on the weekend. Neither of those hauls came against a team of mainly teenagers either. Just sayin'
 
Update

Disposal efficiency by round for Banfield
Round 1 - 41%
Round 2 - 55%
Round 3 - 57%
Round 4 - 67%
Round 5 - 50%
Round 6 - 40%
Round 7 - 60%
Round 8 - 33%
Round 9 - 57%
Round 10 - 60%
Round 11 - 67%
Round 12 - 63%
Round 13 - 65%
Round 14 - 63%
Round 15 - 67%
Round 16 - 25%
Round 17 - 50%
Round 18 - 40%
Round 19 - 57%
Round 20 - 64%
Round 21 - 75%
Round 22 - 60%

Have to hand it to him he got a little better in the 2nd half of the year:rolleyes: (see round 16)

Average 56%

No wonder he didn't get 1 vote in the Rising Star award
 
Update

Disposal efficiency by round for Banfield
Round 1 - 41%
Round 2 - 55%
Round 3 - 57%
Round 4 - 67%
Round 5 - 50%
Round 6 - 40%
Round 7 - 60%
Round 8 - 33%
Round 9 - 57%
Round 10 - 60%
Round 11 - 67%
Round 12 - 63%
Round 13 - 65%
Round 14 - 63%
Round 15 - 67%
Round 16 - 25%
Round 17 - 50%
Round 18 - 40%
Round 19 - 57%
Round 20 - 64%
Round 21 - 75%
Round 22 - 60%

Have to hand it to him he got a little better in the 2nd half of the year:rolleyes: (see round 16)

Average 56%

No wonder he didn't get 1 vote in the Rising Star award

Wow that is truely disgraceful! A supposed up and coming star of the AFL cant even hit a target with every second disposal. His highest for the year was 3/4 targets hit which would be about the norm for a small forward but with the exception of that one game he was disgraceful!
 
Jay Schulz has kicked 8 goals in the VFL on multiple occasions. Lynden Dunn (who?) kicked 10 on the weekend. Neither of those hauls came against a team of mainly teenagers either. Just sayin'

Wow, both of those players came good in the second half of the year. Luckily Brad Miller kicked 10 so I could still be right.
 
Yarran is a titmouse's abortion of a footballer.

Heard a stat during the Carlton Freo game that the 3 amigos scored 40+ goals in Carlton wins and only 13 in losses.

Just another frontrunner to add to Judd, Murphy and Scotland.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Yarran is a titmouse's abortion of a footballer.

Heard a stat during the Carlton Freo game that the 3 amigos scored 40+ goals in Carlton wins and only 13 in losses.

Just another frontrunner to add to Judd, Murphy and Scotland.

I love a good Carlton bashing like the rest of us but that just proves that when they fire Carlton win....stupid arguement but what more would i expect from you Podgey
 
Yarran is a titmouse's abortion of a footballer.

Heard a stat during the Carlton Freo game that the 3 amigos scored 40+ goals in Carlton wins and only 13 in losses.

Just another frontrunner to add to Judd, Murphy and Scotland.

please enlighten me as to what Yarran has to do Banfield being an ineffective hack:confused:
 
I love a good Carlton bashing like the rest of us but that just proves that when they fire Carlton win....stupid arguement but what more would i expect from you Podgey

lol.

Because Garlett's 5 goals were so instrumental to Carlton's caning of Richmond.

Notice the week after against Geelong in a close contest he couldn't execute the most basic of skills.

Against Freo, Betts missed from the goal square.

Against Hawthorn, Yarran was intimidated and bullied off the ball.

Just another frontrunner. Judd, Murphy and Scotland have been named as such. Betts, Yarran and to a lesser extent Garlett join the ranks.
 
lol.

Because Garlett's 5 goals were so instrumental to Carlton's caning of Richmond.

Notice the week after against Geelong in a close contest he couldn't execute the most basic of skills.

Against Freo, Betts missed from the goal square.

Against Hawthorn, Yarran was intimidated and bullied off the ball.

Just another frontrunner. Judd, Murphy and Scotland have been named as such. Betts, Yarran and to a lesser extent Garlett join the ranks.

Jealous that he is having more of an influence on games then Pet Rioli?
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

so nothing to add about the actual thread - Banfield ineffective hack, fair enough

Efficiency is significantly lower in the forward third of the ground, particularly in contested situations. Therefore a figure of 75% can be ranked very highly.

A behind is also counted as an ineffective disposal, so a tally of 3.3 with 6 kicks is ruled as 50% efficiency, even though it's a very good contribution.

Stats are only good if you know how to read them.
 
Efficiency is significantly lower in the forward third of the ground, particularly in contested situations. Therefore a figure of 75% can be ranked very highly.

A behind is also counted as an ineffective disposal, so a tally of 3.3 with 6 kicks is ruled as 50% efficiency, even though it's a very good contribution.

Stats are only good if you know how to read them.

this coming from someone who uses stats to validate every other post.
I'll take that comment with a grain of salt as I do, and everyone else does, with anything you have to say
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom