Remove this Banner Ad

Beams or Paul Williams?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dingoboy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

Who goes down as the better player?

  • Paul Williams

    Votes: 14 60.9%
  • Dayne Beams

    Votes: 9 39.1%

  • Total voters
    23
  • Poll closed .

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Willow was a favourite of mine. I don't really care to compare him and Beams, just wanted to let the cosmos know that I liked Williams a lot.
 
Dayne Beams a far better player.
Williams was a wonderful young player for us and then etched a terrific career but beams just superior overall.

That’s my take.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Dayne Beams a far better player.
Williams was a wonderful young player for us and then etched a terrific career but beams just superior overall.

That’s my take.
He wasn't as good for us as he was for the Sydney Swans.
 
He wasn't as good for us as he was for the Sydney Swans.
That is correct.

When he started with us, when he spoke he was like a cute shy child, all tangled and shy. Was very endearing.
He, as you do, matured.
Really good player.
 
Willo and Beams are not similar at all. Willo was a speedster that took the game on, Beams is more an attacking mid without that burst.

With all due respect to Beema I'd take Willo, absolute jet.
 
I don't see many similarities as players.

If I was choosing between peak Beams and peak Williams I'd go Beams. A more complete player.

But Willo was still a jet. A combo of pace and a penetrating kick is always effective.
 
Willo was a gun for us imo he was a massive loss. Still remember games where he's kick 4 or 5 from the midfield.

Same here mate, Willo could light up the G! Losing him is one of the many things I just can't process.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

I vote Williams as well. Dynamic player, great half forward, and useful midfielder with great pace and a great long kick for goal on the run.

Agree the Beams comparison isn't great. He is more like Treloar, but played his best football at half forward.
 
Beams is a ball magnet in the mould of Sam Mitchell or Greg Williams (not as good as those two though). Willo was a classic Winger, an outside mid with speed, balance and great skills.
I'd have both because they'd compliment each others games so well.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Beams is a ball magnet in the mould of Sam Mitchell or Greg Williams (not as good as those two though). Willo was a classic Winger, an outside mid with speed, balance and great skills.
I'd have both because they'd compliment each others games so well.
You can't have both. You have to choose one!
 
You can't have both. You have to choose one!



Ok, then in a tight GF with it all on the line I'll take Beamer. The ball follows him. Willo, as good as he was, needed that little bit of help to get the ball so that he could have an influence.
 
You can't have both. You have to choose one!
Beams for me.

Better player overall.

Ofcourse the longer Williams is retired the better he’ll become :p

Terrific player but Beams is a step above in my view.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom