Oh jeezThat’s right. He hasn’t been found guilty of anything and it seems channel 9 are the main instigators of any question suggesting otherwise.
You would need to ask yourself why such a successful and smart man such as Kerry Stokes backs him in so much. He clearly thinks he needs support rather than the other way around.
Maye the AFL allow a convicted drug cheat to be a commentator.I would be astounded is this is true (the ANZAC rumour). If you have been following the case you would have heard that the AFP are investigating allegations he buried a USB stick with classified information in his backyard, amongst other things.
Yes, all allegations. But surely the AFL wouldn't allow this. If he is innocent of everything he can do a future ANZAC game.
Classic chickenhawk.If Stokes loves the military so much why did he never serve? He would have been old enough to go to Vietnam. He can buy as many medals as he wants, but he never earnt them. Typical backslapper.
Would have thought this is the relevant place to discuss it?If you cause the thread to devolve into a shitfight with rubbish comments about ANZAC Day, the ADF or any other trolling, you will lose your access for a while. Discuss the issue at hand. If you want to talk political and society in relation to ANZAC Day (as opposed to the football), there's a forum for that.
BRS' suitability to be on the coverage is fine to discuss - but as soon as it goes beyond that, it turns into fertiliser. That's what the SRP is for.Would have thought this is the relevant place to discuss it?
Anyway, I assume Duck will be on hand and he's a human toilet so what's the difference?
Is it even a fake? Have not heard this anywhere apart from the the OP. If there was anything to it you'd think "those nasty leftie media types" would be all over it.Agree with this, but at the same time it's so plausible in this day and age. If it's a deliberate fake, it's a good one